Related categories
Subcategories:
485 found
Search inside:
(import / add options)   Sort by:
1 — 100 / 485
Material to categorize
  1. Natasha Alechina, Brian Logan, Hoang Nga Nguyen & Abdur Rakib (2009). Verifying Time, Memory and Communication Bounds in Systems of Reasoning Agents. Synthese 169 (2):385 - 403.
    We present a framework for verifying systems composed of heterogeneous reasoning agents, in which each agent may have differing knowledge and inferential capabilities, and where the resources each agent is prepared to commit to a goal (time, memory and communication bandwidth) are bounded. The framework allows us to investigate, for example, whether a goal can be achieved if a particular agent, perhaps possessing key information or inferential capabilities, is unable (or unwilling) to contribute more than a given portion of its (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  2. A. P. Alekseev (2006). Filosofskiĭ Tekst: Idei, Argumentat͡sii͡a, Obrazy. Progress-Tradit͡sii͡a.
    Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  3. Catherine Allamel-Raffin (2007). La Raison Et le Réel. Ellipses.
    Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  4. Ian H. Angus (1984). Technique and Enlightenment: Limits of Instrumental Reason. University Press of America.
    Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  5. Dan Ariely (2010). The Upside of Irrationality: The Unexpected Benefits of Defying Logic at Work and at Home. Harper.
    Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  6. Justin D. Arms & Daniel Jacobson (2009). Regret and Irrational Action. In David Sobel & Steven Wall (eds.), Reasons for Action. Cambridge University Press.
    Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  7. Alberto Artosi (2005). Breve Storia Della Ragione: Dai Presocratici Alle Multinazionali. Liguori.
    Remove from this list | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  8. Robert Audi (2001). The Architecture of Reason: The Structure and Substance of Rationality. Oxford University Press.
    The literature on theoretical reason has been dominated by epistemological concerns, treatments of practical reason by ethical concerns. This book overcomes the limitations of dealing with each separately. It sets out a comprehensive theory of rationality applicable to both practical and theoretical reason. In both domains, Audi explains how experience grounds rationality, delineates the structure of central elements, and attacks the egocentric conception of rationality. He establishes the rationality of altruism and thereby supports major moral principles. The concluding part describes (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  9. Michael Bacharach (1992). Backward Induction and Beliefs About Oneself. Synthese 91 (3):247 - 284.
    According to decision theory, the rational initial action in a sequential decision-problem may be found by backward induction or folding back. But the reasoning which underwrites this claim appeals to the agent's beliefs about what she will later believe, about what she will later believe she will still later believe, and so forth. There are limits to the depth of people's beliefs. Do these limits pose a threat to the standard theory of rational sequential choice? It is argued, first, that (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  10. Julian Baggini (2008). The Duck That Won the Lottery: 100 New Experiments for the Armchair Philosopher. Plume.
    Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  11. Julian Baggini (2008). The Duck That Won the Lottery: And 99 Other Bad Arguments. Granta.
    Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  12. Julian Baggini & Peter S. Fosl (2003). The Philosopher's Toolkit: A Compendium of Philosophical Concepts and Methods. Blackwell Publishers.
    Basic tools for arguments -- More advanced tools -- Tools for assessment -- Tools for conceptual distinctions -- Tools of historical schools and philosophers -- Tools for radical critique -- Tools at the limit.
    Remove from this list | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  13. Linden J. Ball & Edward J. N. Stupple (2008). Belief-Logic Conflict Resolution in Syllogistic Reasoning: Inspection-Time Evidence for a Parallel-Process Model. Thinking and Reasoning 14 (2):168-181.
    An experiment is reported examining dual-process models of belief bias in syllogistic reasoning using a problem complexity manipulation and an inspection-time method to monitor processing latencies for premises and conclusions. Endorsement rates indicated increased belief bias on complex problems, a finding that runs counter to the “belief-first” selective scrutiny model, but which is consistent with other theories, including “reasoning-first” and “parallel-process” models. Inspection-time data revealed a number of effects that, again, arbitrated against the selective scrutiny model. The most striking inspection-time (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  14. Renford Bambrough (1974). Conflict and the Scope of Reason. Hull,University of Hull.
    Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  15. Sylvan Barnet (2011). Current Issues and Enduring Questions: A Guide to Critical Thinking and Argument, with Readings. Bedford/St Martin's.
    The unique collaborative effort of a professor of English and a professor of philosophy, Current Issues and Enduring Questions is a balanced and flexible book that provides the benefits of the authors’ dual expertise in effective persuasive writing and rigorous critical thinking. Refined through eight widely adopted editions, it has been revised to address current student interests and trends in argument, research, and writing. Its comprehensive coverage of classic and contemporary approaches to argument includes Aristotle, Toulmin, and a range of (...)
    Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  16. Peter Baumann & Monika Betzler (eds.) (2004). Practical Conflicts: New Philosophical Essays. Cambridge.
    Practical conflicts pervade human life. Agents have many different desires, goals, and commitments, all of which can come into conflict with each other. How can practical reasoning help to resolve these practical conflicts? In this collection of new essays a distinguished roster of philosophers analyze the diverse forms of practical conflict. Their aim is to establish an understanding of the sources of these conflicts, to investigate the challenge they pose to an adequate conception of practical reasoning, and to assess the (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  17. William L. Benoit, Dale Hample & Pamela J. Benoit (eds.) (1992). Readings in Argumentation. Foris Publications.
    Introduction: the Study of Argumentation Although our overall organization of the readings suggests one way of dividing our selected literature, ...
    Remove from this list | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  18. Cristina Bicchieri, Dalla Chiara & Maria Luisa (eds.) (1992). Knowledge, Belief, and Strategic Interaction. Cambridge University Press.
    In recent years there has been a great deal of interaction among game theorists, philosophers, and logicians in certain foundational problems concerning rationality, the formalization of knowledge and practical reasoning, and models of learning and deliberation. This unique volume brings together the work of some of the preeminent figures in their respective disciplines, all of whom are engaged in research at the forefront of their fields. Together they offer a conspectus of the interaction of game theory, logic, and epistemology in (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  19. Nathaniel Bluedorn (2003). The Fallacy Detective: Thirty-Six Lessons on How to Recognize Bad Reasoning. Christian Logic.
    Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  20. Nick Bostrom, Cortical Integration: Possible Solutions to the Binding and Linking Problems in Perception, Reasoning and Long Term Memory.
    The problem of cortical integration is described and various proposed solutions, including grandmother cells, cell assemblies, feed-forward structures, RAAM and synchronization, are reviewed. One method, involving complex attractors, that has received little attention in the literature, is explained and developed. I call this binding through annexation. A simulation study is then presented which suggests ways in which complex attractors could underlie our capacity to reason. The paper ends with a discussion of the efficiency and biological plausibility of the proposals as (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  21. Raymond Boudon (1994). The Art of Self-Persuasion: The Social Explanation of False Beliefs. Polity.
    Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  22. Ed Brandon (1983). Argument Analysis. U.W.I. Mona.
    Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  23. Michael Bratman (2009). Intention, Belief, and Instrumental Rationality. In David Sobel & Steven Wall (eds.), Reasons for Action. Cambridge.
    Two approaches to instrumental rationality Suppose I intend end E, believe that a necessary means to E is M, and believe that M requires that I intend M. My attitudes concerning E and M engage a basic requirement of practical rationality, a requirement that, barring a change in my cited beliefs, I either intend M or give up intending E.2 Call this the Instrumental Rationality requirement – for short, the IR requirement.
    Remove from this list | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  24. Gerhard Brewka (1991). Nonmonotonic Reasoning: Logical Foundations of Commonsense. Cambridge University Press.
    In this book the author gives a broad overview of different areas of research in nonmonotonic reasoning, and presents some new results and ideas based on his research. The guiding principles are: clarification of the different research activities in the area, which have sometimes been undertaken independently of each other; and appreciation of the fact that these research activities often represent different means to the same ends, namely sound theoretical foundations and efficient computation. The book begins with a discussion of (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  25. Grzegorz Bugajak & Jacek Tomczyk (eds.) (2009). Swoistość Człowieka?: Rozumność. Wydawn. Uniwersytetu Kardynała Stefana Wyszyńskiego.
    Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  26. Joseph L. Camp (2002). Confusion: A Study in the Theory of Knowledge. Harvard University Press.
    To attribute confusion to someone is to take up a paternalistic stance in evaluating his reasoning.
    Remove from this list | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  27. S. Cannavo (1998). Think to Win: The Power of Logic in Everyday Life. Prometheus Books.
    Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  28. Nicholas Capaldi (2007). The Art of Deception: An Introduction to Critical Thinking. Prometheus Books.
    Identifying arguments -- Formal analysis of arguments -- Presenting your case -- Attacking an argument -- Defending your case -- Cause-and-effect reasoning.
    Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  29. Adelino Cattani (ed.) (2009). La Svolta Argomentativa: 50 Anni Dopo Perelman E Toulmin. Loffredo University Press.
    Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  30. Nancy Cavender (1978/2010). Logic and Contemporary Rhetoric: The Use of Reason in Everyday Life. Wadsworth Pub. Co..
    This logic book puts critical-thinking skills into a context that you'll remember and use throughout your life.
    Remove from this list | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  31. J. B. Cederblom (2012). Critical Reasoning: Understanding and Criticizing Arguments and Theories. Cengage.
    In this era of increased polarization of opinion and contentious disagreement, CRITICAL REASONING presents a cooperative approach to critical thinking and formation of beliefs. CRITICAL REASONING emphasizes the importance of developing and applying analytical skills in real life contexts. This book is unique in providing multiple, diverse examples of everyday arguments, both textual and visual, including hard to find long argument passages from real-life sources. The book provides clear, step-by-step procedures to help you decide for yourself what to believe--to be (...)
    Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  32. Ruth Chang (2009). Voluntarist Reasons and the Sources of Normativity. In David Sobel & Steven Wall (eds.), Reasons for Action. Cambridge University Press.
    In virtue of what does a consideration provide a practical reason? Suppose the fact that an experience is painful provides you with a reason to avoid it. In virtue of what does the fact that it’s painful have the normativity of a reason – where, in other words, does its normativity come from? As some philosophers put the question, what is the source of a reason’s normativity?
    Remove from this list | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  33. Philip Clark (2009). Mackie's Motivational Argument. In David Sobel & Steven Wall (eds.), Reasons for Action. Cambridge University Press.
    Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  34. Anthony Collins (1707/1984). An Essay Concerning the Use of Reasons in Propositions ; a Discourse of Free-Thinking. Garland.
    Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  35. Filippo Costa (2005). Logica E Verità. Ets.
    1. Ricerche informali -- 2. La verità trascendentale.
    Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  36. Franca D'Agostini (2010). Verità Avvelenata: Buoni E Cattivi Argomenti Nel Dibattito Pubblico. Bollati Boringhieri.
    Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  37. Stephen Darwall (2009). Authority and Second Personal Reasons for Acting. In David Sobel & Steven Wall (eds.), Reasons for Action. Cambridge University Press.
    Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  38. Donald Davidson (2004). Problems of Rationality. Oxford University Press.
    Problems of Rationality is the eagerly awaited fourth volume of Donald Davidson's philosophical writings. From the 1960s until his death in August 2003 Davidson was perhaps the most influential figure in English-language philosophy, and his work has had a profound effect upon the discipline. His unified theory of the interpretation of thought, meaning, and action holds that rationality is a necessary condition for both mind and interpretation. Davidson here develops this theory to illuminate value judgements and how we understand them; (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  39. Jessica Davidson (1971). The Square Root of Tuesday. New York,Mccall Pub. Co..
    Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  40. Hank Davis (2009). Caveman Logic: The Persistence of Primitive Thinking in a Modern World. Prometheus Books.
    Introduction -- The road to imperfection -- Cataloguing irrationality -- Some real life examples -- Science to the rescue -- A deeper look at what's wrong -- Assigning the blame -- Can it be fixed.
    Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  41. Christopher DiCarlo (2011). How to Become a Really Good Pain in the Ass: A Critical Thinker's Guide to Asking the Right Questions. Prometheus Books.
    Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  42. James Dreier (2009). Practical Conditionals. In David Sobel & Steven Wall (eds.), Reasons for Action. Cambridge University Press.
    Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  43. Renée Elio (ed.) (2002). Common Sense, Reasoning, & Rationality. Oxford University Press.
    As the eleventh volume in the New Directions in Cognitive Science series (formerly the Vancouver Studies in Cognitive Science series), this work promises superb scholarship and interdisciplinary appeal. It addresses three areas of current and varied interest: common sense, reasoning, and rationality. While common sense and rationality often have been viewed as two distinct features in a unified cognitive map, this volume offers novel, even paradoxical, views of the relationship. Comprised of outstanding essays from distinguished philosophers, it considers what constitutes (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  44. Donald Evans (1986). Understanding Arguments. Distributed in the U.S.A. And Canada by Humanities Press.
    This book is for people who find themselves beset by arguments: persuasions open and hidden, put forward in books or on buses, blown up onto hoardings or piped right into the home by television and radio. Such arguments may need to be critically weighed and cautiously assessed, if the arguee is not to be taken for a ride. For such analysis, some introduction to logic is required. This book explains how to decide which arguments are sound and what makes the (...)
    Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  45. Emmanuel Chukwudi Eze (2008). On Reason: Rationality in a World of Cultural Conflict and Racism. Duke University Press.
    Preface: What is rationality? -- Acknowledgments -- Introduction: Diversity and the social questions of reason -- Varieties of rational experience -- Ordinary historical reason -- Science, culture, and principles of rationality -- Languages of time in postcolonial memory -- Reason and unreason in politics.
    Remove from this list | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  46. Lester Faigley (2000). Good Reasons. Allyn and Bacon.
    Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  47. James H. Fetzer (ed.) (1984). Principles of Philosophical Reasoning. Rowman & Allanheld.
    Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  48. Kit Fine (1985). Reasoning with Arbitrary Objects. B. Blackwell.
    Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  49. Maurice A. Finocchiaro (2005). Arguments About Arguments: Systematic, Critical, and Historical Essays in Logical Theory. Cambridge University Press.
    Following an approach that is empirical but not psychological, and dialectical but not dialogical, Maurice Finocchiaro defines concepts such as reasoning, argument, argument analysis, critical reasoning, methodological reflection, judgment, critical thinking, and informal logic. Including extended critiques of the views of many contemporary scholars, he also integrates into the discussion Arnauld's Port-Royal Logic, Gramsci's theory of intellectuals, and case studies from the history of science, particularly the work of Galileo, Newton, Huygens, and Lavoisier.
    Remove from this list | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  50. Alec Fisher (2004). The Logic of Real Arguments. Cambridge Univeristy Press.
    This new and expanded edition of The Logic of Real Arguments explains a distinctive method for analysing and evaluating arguments. It discusses many examples, ranging from newspaper articles to extracts from classic texts, and from easy passages to much more difficult ones. It shows students how to use the question 'What argument or evidence would justify me in believing P?', and also how to deal with suppositional arguments beginning with the phrase 'Suppose that X were the case.' It aims to (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  51. Robert J. Fogelin (2003). Walking the Tightrope of Reason: The Precarious Life of a Rational Animal. Oxford University Press.
    Human beings are both supremely rational and deeply superstitious, capable of believing just about anything and of questioning just about everything. Indeed, just as our reason demands that we know the truth, our skepticism leads to doubts we can ever really do so. In Walking the Tightrope of Reason, Robert J. Fogelin guides readers through a contradiction that lies at the very heart of philosophical inquiry. Fogelin argues that our rational faculties insist on a purely rational account of the universe, (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  52. Aníbal Fornari, Carlos Pérez Zavala & Jutta Wester (eds.) (2010). La Razón En Tiempos Difíciles: Homenaje a Dorando J. Michelini. Fundación Icala.
    Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  53. James B. Freeman (2011). Argument Structure: Representation and Theory. Springer.
    An approach to argument macrostructure -- The dialectical nature of argument -- Toulmin's problematic notion of warrant -- The linked-convergent distinction, a first approximation -- Argument structure and disciplinary perspective : the linked-convergent versus multiple-co-ordinatively compound distinctions -- The linked-convergent distinction, refining the criterion -- Argument structure and enthymemes -- From analysis to evaluation.
    Remove from this list | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  54. Roberto Frega (2009). Le Voci Della Ragione: Teorie Della Razionalità Nella Filosofia Americana Contemporanea. Quodlibet.
    Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  55. Marcello Frixione (2007). Come Ragioniamo. Laterza.
    Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  56. P. T. Geach (1976). Reason and Argument. Blackwell.
    Philosophy as now pursued in British universities (and many others) is a highly argumentative discipline. The philosophers most studied are not sages who ...
    Remove from this list | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  57. Thomas Gil (2011). On Reasons. Wehrhahn Verlag.
    Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  58. Thomas Gil (2002). Practical Reasoning. Berlin Verlag, Arno Spitz.
    Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  59. Michael A. Gilbert (1978). How to Win an Argument. Mcgraw-Hill.
    Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  60. Ana Marta González & Alejandro G. Vigo (eds.) (2010). Practical Rationality: Scope and Structures of Human Agency = Racionalidad Práctica: Alcance y Estructuras de la Acción Humana = Praktische Vernunft: Tragweite Und Struktur Menschlichen Handelns. Olms.
    Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  61. Trudy Govier (1991). A Practical Study of Argument. Wadsworth Pub. Co..
    The book also comes with an exhaustive array of study aids that enable the reader to monitor and enhance the learning process.
    Remove from this list | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  62. Leo Groarke (2008). Good Reasoning Matters!: A Constructive Approach to Critical Thinking. Oxford University Press.
    Offering an innovative approach to critical thinking, Good Reasoning Matters! identifies the essential structure of good arguments in a variety of contexts and also provides guidelines to help students construct their own effective arguments. In addition to examining the most common features of faulty reasoning--slanting, bias, propaganda, vagueness, ambiguity, and a common failure to consider opposing points of view--the book introduces a variety of argument schemes and rhetorical techniques. This edition adds material on visual arguments and more exercises.
    Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  63. Gilbert Harman (1999). Reasoning, Meaning, and Mind. Oxford University Press.
    In this important new collection, Gilbert Harman presents a selection of fifteen interconnected essays on fundamental issues at the center of analytic philosophy. The book opens with a group of four essays discussing basic principles of reasoning and rationality. The next three essays argue against the once popular idea that certain claims are true and knowable by virtue of meaning. In the third group of essays Harman presents his own view of meaning and the possibility of thinking in language The (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  64. Paul Healy (2005). Rationality, Hermeneutics, and Dialogue: Toward a Viable Postfoundationalist Account of Rationality. Ashgate.
    Rationality, Hermeneutics and Dialogue develops a systematic response to these questions, defending an approach to rationality that can meet the demands of a ...
    Remove from this list | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  65. Snoeck Henkemans & Arnolda Francisca (1992). Analysing Complex Argumentation: The Reconstruction of Multiple and Coordinatively Compound Argumentation in a Critical Discussion. Sicsat.
    Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  66. Martin Hollis (1987). The Cunning of Reason. Cambridge University Press.
    In this book, the author is attempting to make sense, as a philosopher, of the ideas of rationality put forward by economists, sociologists, and political theorists. The book intervenes in intense current debates within and among several disciplines. Its concern is with the true nature of social actors and the proper character of social science. Its arguments are the more challenging for being presented in simple, incisive, and lucid prose.
    Remove from this list | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  67. Hilton Japiassu (2006). O Sonho Transdisciplinar: E as Razões da Filosofia. Imago.
    Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  68. Howard Kahane (2001). Logic and Contemporary Rhetoric: The Use of Reason in Everyday Life. Wadsworth Thomson Learning.
    [This book offers] compilation of examples from TV, newspapers, magazines, advertisements, and our nation's political dialogue.
    Remove from this list | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  69. Rick Kennedy (2004). A History of Reasonableness: Testimony and Authority in the Art of Thinking. University of Rochester Press.
    The classical tradition of testimony in topics -- Three medieval traditions : Augustine, Boethius, and Cassiodoras -- Two renaissance traditions : Ciceronian and Augustinian -- The long influence of the port-royal logic -- Appreciating Aristotle : Thomists, Scots, and Oxford noetics -- Testimony becomes experience : the rise of critical thinking.
    Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  70. Yong-gyu Kim (2007). Sŏltŭk Ŭi Nollihak: Mal Kwa Kŭl Ŭl Tallyŏn Hanŭn 10-Kaji Nolli Togu. Ungjin Chisik Hausŭ.
    Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  71. Christopher Kirwan (1978). Logic and Argument. New York University Press.
    Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  72. Jakub Kloc-Konkołowicz (2007). Rozum Praktyczny W Filozofii Kanta I Fichtego: Prymat Praktyczności W Klasycznej Myśli Niemieckiej. Wydawn. Uniwersytetu Wrocławskiego.
    Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  73. Stephan Körner (1976). Experience and Conduct: A Philosophical Enquiry Into Practical Thinking. Cambridge University Press.
    Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  74. Jean Ladrière, Bernard Feltz & Michel Ghins (eds.) (2005). Les Défis de la Rationalité: Actes du Colloque Organisé Par l'Institut Supérieur de Philosophie (Ucl) à l'Occasion des 80 Ans du Jean Ladrière. Peeters.
    Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  75. Karel Lambert (1980/1987). The Nature of Argument. University Press of America.
    Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  76. Isaac Levi (1997). The Covenant of Reason: Rationality and the Commitments of Thought. Cambridge University Press.
    Isaac Levi is one of the preeminent philosophers in the areas of pragmatic rationality and epistemology. This collection of essays constitutes an important presentation of his original and influential ideas about rational choice and belief. A wide range of topics is covered, including consequentialism and sequential choice, consensus, voluntarism of belief, and the tolerance of the opinions of others. The essays elaborate on the idea that principles of rationality are norms that regulate the coherence of our beliefs and values with (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  77. Zehou Li (2005). Shi Yong Li Xing Yu le Gan Wen Hua =. Sheng Huo, du Shu, Xin Zhi San Lian Shu Dian.
    Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  78. Pierre Livet (ed.) (2000). L'argumentation: Droit, Philosophie Et Sciences Sociales. L'harmattan.
    Alors que dans les Analytiques, Aristote se préoccupe des raisonnements concernant le vrai, et surtout le nécessaire, « la fonction de la rhétorique, ...
    Remove from this list | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  79. Genevieve Lloyd (1993). The Man of Reason: "Male" and "Female" in Western Philosophy. University of Minnesota Press.
    This new edition of Genevieve Lloyd's classic study of the maleness of reason in philosophy contains a new introduction and bibilographical essay assessing the ...
    Remove from this list | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  80. Louis E. Loeb (2010). Reflection and the Stability of Belief: Essays on Descartes, Hume, and Reid. Oxford University Press.
    This volume will thus appeal to advanced students and scholars not just in the history of early modern philosophy but in epistemology and other core areas of ...
    Remove from this list | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  81. C. Grant Luckhardt (1994). How to Do Things with Logic. L. Erlbaum Associates.
    In the past 15 years a host of critical thinking books have appeared that teach students to find flaws in the arguments of others by learning to detect a number of informal fallacies. This book is not in that tradition. The authors of this book believe that while students learn to become vicious critics, they still continue to make the very mistakes they criticize in others. Thus, this book has adopted the approach of teaching the construction of good arguments first (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  82. Witold Marciszewski (1994). Logic From a Rhetorical Point of View. W. De Gruyter.
    CHAPTER ONE On the Rhetorical Point of View. Why rhetoric declined, and what remained of it. Once upon a time rhetoric was a vast and influential branch of ...
    Remove from this list | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  83. Graham Dunstan Martin (1990). Shadows in the Cave: Mapping the Conscious Universe. Arkana.
    Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  84. John Mauk (2006). Inventing Arguments. Thomson/Wadsworth.
    Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  85. Gonzalo Mayos Solsona (ed.) (2006). Fronteres de la Desraó: Cicle de Conferències Liceu Joan Maragall. La Busca Edicions.
    Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  86. Edward F. McClennen (1990). Rationality and Dynamic Choice: Foundational Explorations. Cambridge University Press.
    In this major contribution to the theory of rational choice the author sets out the foundations of rational choice, and then sketches a dynamic choice framework in which principles of ordering and independence follow from a number of apparently plausible conditions. However there is potential conflict among these conditions, and when they are weakened to avoid it, the usual foundations of rational choice no longer prevail. The thrust of the argument is to suggest that the theory of rational choice is (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  87. Christopher McMahon (2009). Reasonable Disagreement: A Theory of Political Morality. Cambridge University Press.
    This book examines the ways in which reasonable people can disagree about the requirements of political morality. Christopher McMahon argues that there will be a 'zone of reasonable disagreement' surrounding most questions of political morality. Moral notions of right and wrong evolve over time as new zones of reasonable disagreement emerge out of old ones; thus political morality is both different in different societies with varying histories, and different now from what it was in the past. McMahon explores this feature (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  88. Alfred R. Mele & Piers Rawling (eds.) (2004). The Oxford Handbook of Rationality. Oxford University Press.
    Rationality has long been a central topic in philosophy, crossing standard divisions and categories. It continues to attract much attention in published research and teaching by philosophers as well as scholars in other disciplines, including economics, psychology, and law. The Oxford Handbook of Rationality is an indispensable reference to the current state of play in this vital and interdisciplinary area of study. Twenty-two newly commissioned chapters by a roster of distinguished philosophers provide an overview of the prominent views on rationality, (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  89. N. A. Meshcheri͡akova (2011). Ontologicheskie I T͡sennostnye Osnovanii͡a Nauchnoĭ Rat͡sionalʹnosti: Monografii͡a.
    Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  90. Alex C. Michalos (1970). Improving Your Reasoning. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.,Prentice-Hall.
    Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  91. Ben Lazare Mijuskovic (1974). The Achilles of Rationalist Arguments: The Simplicity, Unity, and Identity of Thought and Soul From the Cambridge Platonists to Kant: A Study in the History of an Argument. Martinus Nijhoff.
    INTRODUCTION TO THE ARGUMENT AND ITS HISTORY PRIOR TO THE AND CENTURIES In the history of ideas, there is an argument that has been used repeatedly, ...
    Remove from this list | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  92. David Milligan (1980). Reasoning and the Explanation of Actions. Humanities Press.
    Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  93. Elizabeth Kamarck Minnich (1990). Transforming Knowledge. Temple University Press.
    Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  94. ʻUmer Mîrawdelî (2005). ʻeqł Gerayî. Ḧikumetî Herêmî Kurdistan, Wezaretî Roşinbîrî.
    Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  95. Raoul Mortley (1986). From Word to Silence. Hanstein.
    1. The rise and fall of logos -- 2. The way of negation, Christian and Greek.
    Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  96. Raoul Mortley (1986). The Rise and Fall of Logos. Hanstein.
    Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  97. Ronald Munson (2010). The Elements of Reasoning. Wadsworth.
    This text is not only perfect for a college course in argument analysis, but also as a reference tool when confronted with arguments outside the classroom experience.
    Remove from this list | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  98. Raymond S. Nickerson (1986). Reflections on Reasoning. L. Erlbaum Associates.
    Introduction This book is about reasoning. It is not a textbook in the conventional sense. Nor does it provide a prescription for how to reason effectively. ...
    Remove from this list | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  99. Gunnar Olsson (1975). Birds in Egg. Dept. Of Geography, University of Michigan.
    Utg. 1975 som: Michigan geographical publication ; 15.
    Remove from this list | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  100. John Arthur Passmore (1970/1969). Philosophical Reasoning. London,Duckworth.
    Remove from this list | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
1 — 100 / 485