About this topic
Summary The topics dealt with under this category relate to the general nature of change in the sciences.  Most work in this area has addressed the topic of theory change, which was brought to the forefront of philosophical attention by the "historical turn", associated with such writers as Thomas Kuhn, Paul Feyerabend, Imre Lakatos and Larry Laudan.  A variety of philosophical problems arise in this area, including the question of whether science progresses toward truth, the rationality of choice between theories, the structure of theories, and the possibility of comparing alternative theories.
Key works Current thinking about scientific change may be traced back to  Kuhn 1962, or later editions, e.g. Kuhn 1996.  A valuable collection of essays on the topic is Lakatos & Musgrave 1970.  See, in particular, Lakatos 1970, for Lakatos's proposal of a methodology of scientific research programs.  Feyerabend 1974 is an influential discussion of the topic, including its implications for methodology.  Laudan 1977 is an important critical discussion of the works of Kuhn and Lakatos, which introduces Laudan's own positive account.  Kitcher 1993 continues the discussion, while introducing important proposals with respect to a realist account of scientific change.
Introductions Chalmers 1982 is an excellent introductory textbook which provides good general coverage of the issues relating to scientific change. See Nickles 2010 for an overview of topics relating to scientific revolutions.  Devitt 1979 is an incisive discussion of the claim that alternative theories are incommensurable.  See Bird 2007 for one proposal about the nature of scientific progress, and Sankey 1995 for some aspects of the problem of the rationality of the choice between theories.
  Show all references
Related categories
Subcategories:
1035 found
Search inside:
(import / add options)   Sort by:
1 — 50 / 1035
Material to categorize
  1. Carlos Alchourrón (forthcoming). Systematization and Change in the Science of Law. Rechtstheorie.
    Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  2. Gunnar Andersson (1984). Rationality in Science and Politics.
    Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  3. N. Angelis (1989). Lakatos on the Evaluation of Scientific Theories in Imre Lakatos and Theories of Scientific Change. Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science 111:157-167.
    Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  4. H. B. (1971). Studies in Philosophy and in the History of Science. Review of Metaphysics 24 (4):765-766.
    Remove from this list | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  5. George Botterill (2007). Review of Hanne Andersen, Peter Barker, Xiang Chen, The Cognitive Structure of Scientific Revolutions. [REVIEW] Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews 2007 (3).
    Remove from this list | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  6. Martin Carrier & Alfred Nordmann (2011). Science in the Context of Application: Methodological Change, Conceptual Transformation, Cultural Reorientation. In M. Carrier & A. Nordmann (eds.), Science in the Context of Application. Springer. 1--7.
    Remove from this list | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  7. Mario Casanueva Y. Diego Méndez (2008). Teoría y experimento en Genética Mendeliana: una exposición en imágenes. Theoria 23 (3):285-306.
    En este artículo tratamos sobre los aspectos empíricos y conceptuales en la Genética Mendeliana y analizamos los vínculos entre ellos. Primero discutimos las ventajas de una representación gráfica de las teorías empíricas; luego pormenorizamos la estructura conceptual de la genécica; en seguida, esquematizamos su protocolo experimental, a continuación destacamos los engarces entre ambas representaciones y, por último, proporcionamos una caracterización holista de la práctica genética, donde el representar y el intervenir se encucntran entremezclados.In this article we deal with the conceptual (...)
    Remove from this list |
    Translate to English
    | Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  8. Xiang Chen (1992). Theories, Experiments, and Human Agents: The Controversy Between Emissionists and Undulationists in Britain, 1827-1859. Dissertation, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University
    This dissertation is an interdisciplinary study of scientific change. The undulatory theory of light replaced the emission theory of light in the early nineteenth century, triggering an "optical revolution" and vigorous debates among physicists in Britain from the 1830s to the 1850s. In this study I give the first full account of this extended episode of scientific change, drawing on methods and concepts from history, sociology and philosophy of science. The interdisciplinary account of the episode provides a basis for criticizing (...)
    Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  9. R. Clarke (1960). HANSON, N. R. -Patterns of Discovery: An Inquiry Into the Conceptual Foundations of Science. [REVIEW] Mind 69:267.
    Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  10. A. C. Crombie (1963). Scientific Change; Historical Studies in the Intellectual, Social, and Technical Conditions for Scientific Discovery and Technical Invention, From Antiquity to the Present. Basic Books.
    Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  11. A. C. Crombie & International Union of the History and Philosophy of Science (1963). Scientific Change Uncorrected Proof Copy. Heineman.
    Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  12. Sebastian Enqvist (2011). A Structuralist Framework for the Logic of Theory Change. In Erik J. Olson Sebastian Enqvist (ed.), Belief Revision Meets Philosophy of Science. Springer. 105--135.
    Remove from this list | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  13. James K. Feibleman (1959). The Logical Structure of the Scientific Method. Dialectica 13 (3‐4):208-225.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  14. J. Forge (1985). LAUDAN R.: "The Nature of Technological Knowledge: Are Models of Scientific Change Relevant"? [REVIEW] Australasian Journal of Philosophy 63:551.
    Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  15. G. G. G. (1971). Fundamental Change in Law and Society. Review of Metaphysics 25 (2):360-361.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  16. N. A. G. (1963). Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science. Review of Metaphysics 17 (2):311-311.
    Remove from this list | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  17. Gerald L. Geison (1981). Scientific Change, Emerging Specialties, and Research Schools. History of Science 19 (43 pt 1):20-40.
    Remove from this list | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  18. Q. Gibson (1975). ESNOFF, M. H.: "The Structure of Social Science: A Philosophical Introduction". [REVIEW] Australasian Journal of Philosophy 53:89.
    Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  19. Norwood Russell Hanson (1958). Patterns of Discovery an Inquiry Into the Conceptual Foundations of Science. Monograph Collection (Matt - Pseudo).
    Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  20. Allen J. Harder (1974). E. A. Milne, Scientific Revolutions and the Growth of Knowledge. Annals of Science 31 (4):351-363.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  21. Paul K. Hoch (1990). Scrutinizing Science: Empirical Studies of Scientfic Change, Ed. By Arthur Donovan, Larry Laudan and Rachel Laudan. History of Science 28:211-219.
    Remove from this list | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  22. Gerald Holton (2003). Of Science Emeritus, Harvard University. His Research in the History of Science has Resulted in a Number of Books, Including The Advancement of Science, and Its Burdens (1986), Thematic Origins of Scientific Thought (1988), Einstein, History, and Other Passions (2000), and (with Stephen G. Brush) Physics, the Human. [REVIEW] Science and Education 12:725-727.
    Remove from this list | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  23. H. F. Kearney (1964). Scientific Change. Philosophical Studies 13:243-245.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  24. H. F. Kearney (1964). Scientific Change. Philosophical Studies 13:243-245.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  25. Leah A. Lievrouw (1988). Four Programs of Research in Scientific Communication. Knowledge in Society 1 (2):6-22.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  26. Peter Lipton (2005). Does the Truth Matter in Science? Arts and Humanities in Higher Education: An International Journal of Theory, Research and Practice 4 (2):173-183.
    Is science in the truth business, discovering ever more about an independent and largely unobservable world? Karl Popper and Thomas Kuhn, two of the most important figures in science studies in the 20th century, gave accounts of science that are in some tension with the truth view. Their central claims about science are considered here, along with two arguments that bear directly on the truth question. One argument makes an appeal to past scientific failures to argue against the truth view; (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  27. A. R. Louch (1965). Scientific Discovery and Legal Change. The Monist 49 (3):485-503.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  28. Andrew Lugg (1991). Consensus and Common Ground. Tijdschrift Voor Filosofie 53 (3):474 - 488.
    Philosophers concerned with the character of scientific disputes tend to divide into two camps. On the one side there are those who hold that scientists can always settle their differences by appealing to shared assumptions; on the other side there are those who maintain that in many cases scientists must resort to (nonrational ) persuasion to establish their views. The trouble is that for all their strong points both approaches labour under enormous difficulties. Scientific disagreement is often much deeper than (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  29. Witold Mackiewicz (2012). Czesław Dejnarowicz, Literatura Naukowa — Uczeni — Wydawcy (Scientific Literature — Scientists — Publishers). Dialectics and Humanism 8 (2):164-166.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  30. Witold Mackiewicz (1981). Czesław Dejnarowicz, Literatura Naukowa — Uczeni — Wydawcy (Scientific Literature — Scientists — Publishers). Dialectics and Humanism 8 (2):164-166.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  31. Miles MacLeod (2012). Rethinking Scientific Concepts for Research Contexts: The Case of the Classical Gene. In Uljana Feest & Friedrich Steinle (eds.), Scientific Concepts and Investigative Practice. De Gruyter. 3--47.
    Remove from this list | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  32. J. E. McGuire (1992). Scientific Change: Perspectives and Proposals. In Merrilee H. Salmon (ed.), Introduction to the Philosophy of Science. Hackett Pub.. 132--178.
    Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  33. J. Moscoso (2001). Biographies of Scientific Objects. Daimon 24:151.
    Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  34. R. M. Nugaev (2002). Basic Paradigm Change The Conception of Communicative Rationality. Russian Studies in Philosophy 41 (2):23-36.
    The problem of the theoretical reconstruction of the process of scientific paradigm change is by no means a new one in the philosophy and sociology of science. Nevertheless, one cannot say that its investigation has reached the point at which an overwhelming majority of specialists would agree at least about exactly how and in what directions it is necessary to move forward. Notwithstanding this circumstance, one can specify a certain set of basic questions that are recognized as such by the (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  35. Luke O'sullivan (2007). Hanne Andersen, Peter Barker, and Xiang Chen, The Cognitive Structure of Scientific Revolutions. [REVIEW] Philosophy in Review 27:164-166.
    Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  36. L. O. Sullivan (2007). Hanne Andersen, Peter Barker, and Xiang Chen, The Cognitive Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Philosophy in Review 27 (3):164.
    Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  37. Samir Okasha (2015). On Arrow’s Theorem and Scientific Rationality: Reply to Morreau and Stegenga. Mind 124 (493):279-294.
    In a recent article I compared the problem of theory choice, in which scientists must choose between competing theories, with the problem of social choice, in which society must choose between competing social alternatives. I argued that the formal machinery of social choice theory can be used to shed light on the problem of theory choice in science, an argument that has been criticized by Michael Morreau and Jacob Stegenga. This article replies to Morreau’s and Stegenga’s criticisms.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  38. David Papineau (1975). LESSNOFF, MICHAEL "The Structure of Social Science: A Philosophical Introduction". [REVIEW] Philosophy 50:364.
    Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  39. H. Putnam (2002). Larry Laudan,*" A Confutation of Convergent Realism. In Yuri Balashov & Alexander Rosenberg (eds.), Philosophy of Science: Contemporary Readings. Routledge. 211.
    Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  40. E. A. R. (1966). Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science, II. Review of Metaphysics 19 (4):820-821.
    Remove from this list | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  41. Nicholas Rescher (1981). Scientific Progress: A Philosophical Essay on the Economics of Research in Natural Science. Noûs 15 (3):418-423.
    Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  42. Paul A. Roth (2013). The Silence of the Norms: The Missing Historiography of The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 44 (4):545-52.
    History has been disparaged since the late 19th century for not conforming to norms of scientific explanation. Nonetheless, as a matter of fact a work of history upends the regnant philosophical conception of science in the second part of the 20th century. Yet despite its impact, Kuhn’s Structure has failed to motivate philosophers to ponder why works of history should be capable of exerting rational influence on an understanding of philosophy of science. But all this constitutes a great irony and (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  43. Darrell P. Rowbottom (forthcoming). Extending the Argument From Unconceived Alternatives: Observations, Models, Predictions, Explanations, Methods, Instruments, Experiments, and Values. Synthese.
    Stanford’s argument against scientific realism focuses on theories, just as many earlier arguments from inconceivability have. However, there are possible arguments against scientific realism involving unconceived (or inconceivable) entities of different types: observations, models, predictions, explanations, methods, instruments, experiments, and values. This paper charts such arguments. In combination, they present the strongest challenge yet to scientific realism.
    Remove from this list | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  44. Rustum Roy (1986). Science Must Change or Self-Destruct. BioScience 36 (10):660-661.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  45. Wojciech Sady (2011). Odkrywanie elektronu a pytanie o naturę badań naukowych. Filozofia Nauki 3.
    The historical development of scientific knowledge is examined in the context of research, and not, as tradition tells, in the context of justification. It is a story about experimental researches and theoretical investigations conducted in the years 1820-1902, which finally led to the discovery of electron, accompanied by methodological comments. Main results of the analysis are that knowledge is scientific if it has a systemic character, and experimental studies are scientific if they are systematic. „Systemic” means that studied objects or (...)
    Remove from this list |
    Translate to English
    |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  46. Tadeusz Sierotowicz (1996). O kosmologicznych tradycjach badawczych. Filozofia Nauki 1.
    In the paper the conception of Cosmological Research Tradition, founded on the methodology of scientific research tradition introduced by L. Laudan, is proposed. A brief remark of the status of various problems in the domain of philosophy of science is also given.
    Remove from this list |
    Translate to English
    |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  47. F. W. Westaway (1921). Scientific Method: Its Philosophy and Practice. Journal of Philosophy 18 (17):472-475.
    Remove from this list | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  48. Krystyna Zamiara (2011). Droga twórcza Jerzego Kmity jako sekwencja przesunięć problemowych. Filo-Sofija 11 (12 (2011/1)):109-127.
    Author: Zamiara Krystyna Title: JERZY KMITA’S CREATIVE JOURNEY AS A SEQUENCE OF PROBLEM-SHIFTS (Droga twórcza Jerzego Kmity jako sekwencja przesunięć problemowych) Source: Filo-Sofija year: 2011, vol:.12, number: 2011/1, pages: 109-127 Keywords: KMITA, SOCIO-REGULATORY THEORY OF CULTURE, HISTORICAL EPISTEMOLOGY, SCIENCE, CULTURE, MARXISM Discipline: PHILOSOPHY Language: POLISH Document type: ARTICLE Publication order reference (Primary author’s office address): E-mail: www:This paper presents meta-philosophical considerations concerning evolution of Jerzy Kmita’s intellectual standpoint. The author focuses on two crucial “problem-shifts” which lead Kmita to his genuine (...)
    Remove from this list |
    Translate to English
    | Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
Incommensurability in Science
  1. Peter Achinstein (1964). On the Meaning of Scientific Terms. Journal of Philosophy 61 (17):497-509.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  2. Joseph Agassi (2003). Comparability and Incommensurability. Social Epistemology 17 (2 & 3):93 – 94.
1 — 50 / 1035