About this topic
Summary The topics dealt with under this category relate to the general nature of change in the sciences.  Most work in this area has addressed the topic of theory change, which was brought to the forefront of philosophical attention by the "historical turn", associated with such writers as Thomas Kuhn, Paul Feyerabend, Imre Lakatos and Larry Laudan.  A variety of philosophical problems arise in this area, including the question of whether science progresses toward truth, the rationality of choice between theories, the structure of theories, and the possibility of comparing alternative theories.
Key works Current thinking about scientific change may be traced back to  Kuhn 1962, or later editions, e.g. Kuhn 1996.  A valuable collection of essays on the topic is Lakatos & Musgrave 1970.  See, in particular, Lakatos 1970, for Lakatos's proposal of a methodology of scientific research programs.  Feyerabend 1974 is an influential discussion of the topic, including its implications for methodology.  Laudan 1977 is an important critical discussion of the works of Kuhn and Lakatos, which introduces Laudan's own positive account.  Kitcher 1993 continues the discussion, while introducing important proposals with respect to a realist account of scientific change.
Introductions Chalmers 1982 is an excellent introductory textbook which provides good general coverage of the issues relating to scientific change. See Nickles 2010 for an overview of topics relating to scientific revolutions.  Devitt 1979 is an incisive discussion of the claim that alternative theories are incommensurable.  See Bird 2007 for one proposal about the nature of scientific progress, and Sankey 1995 for some aspects of the problem of the rationality of the choice between theories.
  Show all references
Related categories
Subcategories:
1132 found
Search inside:
(import / add options)   Sort by:
1 — 50 / 1132
Material to categorize
  1. Carlos Alchourrón (forthcoming). Systematization and Change in the Science of Law. Rechtstheorie.
    Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  2. Gunnar Andersson (1984). Rationality in Science and Politics.
    Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  3. H. B. (1971). Studies in Philosophy and in the History of Science. Review of Metaphysics 24 (4):765-766.
    Remove from this list | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  4. Ingemar Bohlin (2001). Biographies of Scientific Objects. [REVIEW] British Journal for the History of Science 34 (3):341-373.
    Remove from this list | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  5. George Botterill (2007). Review of Hanne Andersen, Peter Barker, Xiang Chen, The Cognitive Structure of Scientific Revolutions. [REVIEW] Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews 2007 (3).
    Remove from this list | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  6. Martin Carrier & Alfred Nordmann (2011). Science in the Context of Application: Methodological Change, Conceptual Transformation, Cultural Reorientation. In M. Carrier & A. Nordmann (eds.), Science in the Context of Application. Springer. 1--7.
    Remove from this list | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  7. Mario Casanueva Y. Diego Méndez (2008). Teoría y experimento en Genética Mendeliana: una exposición en imágenes. Theoria 23 (3):285-306.
    En este artículo tratamos sobre los aspectos empíricos y conceptuales en la Genética Mendeliana y analizamos los vínculos entre ellos. Primero discutimos las ventajas de una representación gráfica de las teorías empíricas; luego pormenorizamos la estructura conceptual de la genécica; en seguida, esquematizamos su protocolo experimental, a continuación destacamos los engarces entre ambas representaciones y, por último, proporcionamos una caracterización holista de la práctica genética, donde el representar y el intervenir se encucntran entremezclados.In this article we deal with the conceptual (...)
    Remove from this list |
    Translate to English
    | Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  8. R. Clarke (1960). HANSON, N. R. -Patterns of Discovery: An Inquiry Into the Conceptual Foundations of Science. [REVIEW] Mind 69:267.
    Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  9. A. C. Crombie (1963). Scientific Change; Historical Studies in the Intellectual, Social, and Technical Conditions for Scientific Discovery and Technical Invention, From Antiquity to the Present. Basic Books.
    Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  10. A. C. Crombie & International Union of the History and Philosophy of Science (1963). Scientific Change Uncorrected Proof Copy. Heineman.
    Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  11. Gene Albert D'amour (1971). Political Theory as a Science or Ethical Theory as the Hard Core of a Scientific Research Program. Dissertation, University of Minnesota
    Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  12. G. G. G. (1971). Fundamental Change in Law and Society. Review of Metaphysics 25 (2):360-361.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  13. Norwood Russell Hanson (1958). Patterns of Discovery an Inquiry Into the Conceptual Foundations of Science. Monograph Collection (Matt - Pseudo).
    Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  14. H. F. Kearney (1964). Scientific Change. Philosophical Studies 13:243-245.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  15. H. F. Kearney (1964). Scientific Change. Philosophical Studies 13:243-245.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  16. Mateusz Kotowski (2013). Toulmin’s Evolutionary Theory of Scientific Development: The Study of a Failure. Studia Philosophica Wratislaviensia:121-139.
    Remove from this list |
    Translate to English
    |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  17. S. A. Lantsov (1991). Sotsial Nye Revoliutsii I Obshchestvennyi Progress Teoriia, Istoriia, Sovremennost. Monograph Collection (Matt - Pseudo).
    Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  18. A. R. Louch (1965). Scientific Discovery and Legal Change. The Monist 49 (3):485-503.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  19. Andrew Lugg (1991). Consensus and Common Ground. Tijdschrift Voor Filosofie 53 (3):474 - 488.
    Philosophers concerned with the character of scientific disputes tend to divide into two camps. On the one side there are those who hold that scientists can always settle their differences by appealing to shared assumptions; on the other side there are those who maintain that in many cases scientists must resort to (nonrational ) persuasion to establish their views. The trouble is that for all their strong points both approaches labour under enormous difficulties. Scientific disagreement is often much deeper than (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  20. Witold Mackiewicz (2012). Czesław Dejnarowicz, Literatura Naukowa — Uczeni — Wydawcy (Scientific Literature — Scientists — Publishers). Dialectics and Humanism 8 (2):164-166.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  21. Witold Mackiewicz (1981). Czesław Dejnarowicz, Literatura Naukowa — Uczeni — Wydawcy (Scientific Literature — Scientists — Publishers). Dialectics and Humanism 8 (2):164-166.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  22. Miles MacLeod (2012). Rethinking Scientific Concepts for Research Contexts: The Case of the Classical Gene. In Uljana Feest & Friedrich Steinle (eds.), Scientific Concepts and Investigative Practice. De Gruyter. 3--47.
    Remove from this list | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  23. J. E. McGuire (1992). Scientific Change: Perspectives and Proposals. In Merrilee H. Salmon (ed.), Introduction to the Philosophy of Science. Hackett Pub.. 132--178.
    Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  24. J. Moscoso (2001). Biographies of Scientific Objects. Daimon 24:151.
    Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  25. Henry Moss (1983). Scientists and Sans Culottes. The Spread of Scientific Literacy in the Revolutionary Year II. Fundamenta Scientia 4 (2).
    Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  26. Nancy Joan Nersessian (1977). The Structure of Scientific "Evolutions": On Change in Conceptual Structures in Science. Dissertation, Case Western Reserve University
    Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  27. J. M. Zyci Nski (1988). The Structure of the Metascientific Revolution an Essay on the Growth of Modern Science.
    Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  28. R. M. Nugaev (2002). Basic Paradigm Change The Conception of Communicative Rationality. Russian Studies in Philosophy 41 (2):23-36.
    The problem of the theoretical reconstruction of the process of scientific paradigm change is by no means a new one in the philosophy and sociology of science. Nevertheless, one cannot say that its investigation has reached the point at which an overwhelming majority of specialists would agree at least about exactly how and in what directions it is necessary to move forward. Notwithstanding this circumstance, one can specify a certain set of basic questions that are recognized as such by the (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  29. Luke O'sullivan (2007). Hanne Andersen, Peter Barker, and Xiang Chen, The Cognitive Structure of Scientific Revolutions. [REVIEW] Philosophy in Review 27:164-166.
    Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  30. L. O. Sullivan (2007). Hanne Andersen, Peter Barker, and Xiang Chen, The Cognitive Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Philosophy in Review 27 (3):164.
    Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  31. David Papineau (1975). LESSNOFF, MICHAEL "The Structure of Social Science: A Philosophical Introduction". [REVIEW] Philosophy 50:364.
    Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  32. H. Putnam (2002). Larry Laudan,*" A Confutation of Convergent Realism. In Yuri Balashov & Alexander Rosenberg (eds.), Philosophy of Science: Contemporary Readings. Routledge. 211.
    Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  33. E. A. R. (1966). Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science, II. Review of Metaphysics 19 (4):820-821.
    Remove from this list | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  34. Paul A. Roth (2013). The Silence of the Norms: The Missing Historiography of The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 44 (4):545-52.
    History has been disparaged since the late 19th century for not conforming to norms of scientific explanation. Nonetheless, as a matter of fact a work of history upends the regnant philosophical conception of science in the second part of the 20th century. Yet despite its impact, Kuhn’s Structure has failed to motivate philosophers to ponder why works of history should be capable of exerting rational influence on an understanding of philosophy of science. But all this constitutes a great irony and (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  35. Darrell P. Rowbottom (forthcoming). Extending the Argument From Unconceived Alternatives: Observations, Models, Predictions, Explanations, Methods, Instruments, Experiments, and Values. Synthese.
    Stanford’s argument against scientific realism focuses on theories, just as many earlier arguments from inconceivability have. However, there are possible arguments against scientific realism involving unconceived (or inconceivable) entities of different types: observations, models, predictions, explanations, methods, instruments, experiments, and values. This paper charts such arguments. In combination, they present the strongest challenge yet to scientific realism.
    Remove from this list | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  36. Rustum Roy (1986). Science Must Change or Self-Destruct. BioScience 36 (10):660-661.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  37. Wojciech Sady (2011). Odkrywanie elektronu a pytanie o naturę badań naukowych. Filozofia Nauki 3.
    The historical development of scientific knowledge is examined in the context of research, and not, as tradition tells, in the context of justification. It is a story about experimental researches and theoretical investigations conducted in the years 1820-1902, which finally led to the discovery of electron, accompanied by methodological comments. Main results of the analysis are that knowledge is scientific if it has a systemic character, and experimental studies are scientific if they are systematic. „Systemic” means that studied objects or (...)
    Remove from this list |
    Translate to English
    |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  38. John Andrew Schuster & Richard R. Yeo (1986). The Politics and Rhetoric of Scientific Method Historical Studies.
    Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  39. Glenn Theodore Seaborg (1996). A Scientist Speaks Out a Personal Perspective on Science, Society and Change.
    Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  40. Tadeusz Sierotowicz (1996). O kosmologicznych tradycjach badawczych. Filozofia Nauki 1.
    In the paper the conception of Cosmological Research Tradition, founded on the methodology of scientific research tradition introduced by L. Laudan, is proposed. A brief remark of the status of various problems in the domain of philosophy of science is also given.
    Remove from this list |
    Translate to English
    |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  41. Richard Lee Smith (1975). Continuity and Change: An Essay in the Philosophy of Science. Dissertation, Yale University
    Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  42. Marinus Dirk Stafleu (1987). Theories at Work on the Structure and Functioning of Theories in Science, in Particular During the Copernican Revolution. Monograph Collection (Matt - Pseudo).
    Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  43. Keith Vernon (1989). Science as a Process: An Evolutionary Account of the Social and Conceptual Development of Science. [REVIEW] British Journal for the History of Science 22 (4):461-462.
    Remove from this list | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  44. F. W. Westaway (1921). Scientific Method: Its Philosophy and Practice. Journal of Philosophy 18 (17):472-475.
    Remove from this list | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  45. Krystyna Zamiara (2011). Droga twórcza Jerzego Kmity jako sekwencja przesunięć problemowych. Filo-Sofija 11 (12 (2011/1)):109-127.
    Author: Zamiara Krystyna Title: JERZY KMITA’S CREATIVE JOURNEY AS A SEQUENCE OF PROBLEM-SHIFTS (Droga twórcza Jerzego Kmity jako sekwencja przesunięć problemowych) Source: Filo-Sofija year: 2011, vol:.12, number: 2011/1, pages: 109-127 Keywords: KMITA, SOCIO-REGULATORY THEORY OF CULTURE, HISTORICAL EPISTEMOLOGY, SCIENCE, CULTURE, MARXISM Discipline: PHILOSOPHY Language: POLISH Document type: ARTICLE Publication order reference (Primary author’s office address): E-mail: www:This paper presents meta-philosophical considerations concerning evolution of Jerzy Kmita’s intellectual standpoint. The author focuses on two crucial “problem-shifts” which lead Kmita to his genuine (...)
    Remove from this list |
    Translate to English
    | Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  46. J. M. Ziman (1987). Knowing Everything About Nothing Specialization and Change in Scientific Careers. Monograph Collection (Matt - Pseudo).
    Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
Incommensurability in Science
  1. Peter Achinstein (1964). On the Meaning of Scientific Terms. Journal of Philosophy 61 (17):497-509.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  2. Joseph Agassi (2003). Comparability and Incommensurability. Social Epistemology 17 (2 & 3):93 – 94.
  3. Evandro Agazzi (1985). Commensurability, Incommensurability, and Cumulativity in Scientific Knowledge. Erkenntnis 22 (1-3):51 - 77.
    Until the middle of the present century it was a commonly accepted opinion that theory change in science was the expression of cumulative progress consisting in the acquisition of new truths and the elimination of old errors. Logical empiricists developed this idea through a deductive model, saying that a theory T superseding a theory T must be able logically to explain whatever T explained and something more as well. Popper too shared this model, but stressed that T explains the old (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  4. Juan Carlos Aguirre García (2008). Reply To: Is Incommensurability Incomparability? Discusiones Filosóficas 9 (13):113 - 125.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
1 — 50 / 1132