About this topic
Summary The question of the nature of scientific progress arises from reflection on the nature of scientific change.  Change in science is not typically mere change nor is it typically a change of fashion.  Scientific change leads to scientific progress.  But how is progress to be conceived?  Some have thought of scientific progress in terms of advance on truth or the cumulative build-up of truth.  Others have been inclined to think of progress in terms of the growth of knowledge.  Still others have thought of progress in a way that does not require growth of knowledge or truth, so much as improved problem-solving capacity or efficacity.
Key works Concerns about the cumulative model of scientific progress may be found in Kuhn 1962, or in later editions, e.g. Kuhn 1996Laudan 1977 is a sustained discussion of the topic which proposes a problem-solving model of progress.  For a good introduction to Popper's views about science and scientific progress, see Popper 1989.  A recent proposal which understands scientific progress in terms of the accumulation of knowledge is found in Bird 2007
Introductions Niiniluoto 2008
  Show all references
Related categories
Siblings:See also:
291 found
Search inside:
(import / add options)   Sort by:
1 — 50 / 291
  1. Robert Ackermann (1988). Experiment as the Motor of Scientific Progress. Social Epistemology 2 (4):327 – 335.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  2. Shakuntala A. Singh Ajai R. Singh (2004). Replicative Nature of Indian Research, Essence of Scientific Temper, and Future of Scientific Progress. Mens Sana Monographs 2 (1):57.
    Remove from this list | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  3. Rr Akolektiv, R. Steindl, P. Horak, Z. Javurek & V. Zatka (1983). The Criticism of Bourgeois Philosophical Approaches to Contemporary Scientific and Technical Progress. Filosoficky Casopis 31 (1):38-55.
    Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  4. S. Alberchi & Lecce Milella (1976). AA. W., Problems of Scientific Revolution. Progress and Obstacles to Progress. International Logic Review: Rassegna Internazionale di Logica 18 (13-16).
    Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  5. Atocha Aliseda (2005). Lacunae, Empirical Progress and Semantic Tableaux. Poznan Studies in the Philosophy of the Sciences and the Humanities 83 (1):169-189.
    In this paper I address the question of the dynamics of empirical progress, both in theory evaluation and in theory improvement. I meet the challenge laid down by Theo Kuipers in Kuipers (1999), namely to operationalize the task of "instrumentalist abduction," that is, theory revision aiming at empirical progress. I offer a reformulation of Kuipers' account of empirical progress in the framework of (extended) semantic tableaux and show that this is indeed an appealing method by which to account for some (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  6. Robert Almeder (1983). Scientific Progress and Peircean Utopian Realism. Erkenntnis 20 (3):253 - 280.
    I argue that (1) if scientific progress, construed in revolutionary terms, were to continue indefinitely long, then any non-trivial question answerable by the use of the scientific method would in fact be answered in a way that would allow for further refinement without undermining the essential correctness of the answer; and (2) it is reasonable to believe that scientific progress will continue indefinitely long. The establishment of (1) and (2) entails that any non-trivial empirically answerable question will be answered in (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  7. H. Andersen (1997). Review of the Third Edition of Scientific Progress and The Metaphysics of Science. [REVIEW] Erkenntnis 47 (1997):265-271.
    Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  8. Hanne Andersen (1997). Craig Dilworth: Scientific Progress. A Study Concerning the Nature of the Relation Between Successive Scientific Theories. Craig Dilworth: The Metaphysics of Science. An Account of Modern Science in Terms of Principles, Laws and Theories. [REVIEW] Erkenntnis 47 (2):265-271.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  9. Gunnar Andersson (1986). II. Lakatos and Progress and Rationality in Science: A Reply to Agassi. Philosophia 16 (2):239-243.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  10. Jerrold L. Aronson, Rom Harre, Eileen Cornell Way, Robin Findlay Hendry & David J. Mossley (1999). Reviews-Realism Rescued: How Scientific Progress is Possible. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 50 (1):175-180.
    Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  11. Jerrold L. Aronson, Rom Harré & Eileen Cornell Way (1994). Realism Rescued How Scientific Progress is Possible.
    Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  12. Brian S. Baigrie (1992). A Reappraisal of Duhem's Conception of Scientific Progress. Revue Internationale de Philosophie 46 (182):344-360.
    Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  13. Davis Baird & Thomas Faust (1990). Scientific Instruments, Scientific Progress and the Cyclotron. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 41 (2):147-175.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (8 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  14. Alan Baker (2001). Mathematics, Indispensability and Scientific Progress. Erkenntnis 55 (1):85-116.
  15. Dominic J. Balestra (1981). Progress and Rationality in Science. By G. Radnitzky and G. Andersson (Editors). Modern Schoolman 59 (1):70-72.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  16. Greg Bamford (1999). What is the Problem of Ad Hoc Hypotheses? Science and Education 8 (4):375 - 86..
    The received view of an ad hochypothesis is that it accounts for only the observation(s) it was designed to account for, and so non-ad hocness is generally held to be necessary or important for an introduced hypothesis or modification to a theory. Attempts by Popper and several others to convincingly explicate this view, however, prove to be unsuccessful or of doubtful value, and familiar and firmer criteria for evaluating the hypotheses or modified theories so classified are characteristically available. These points (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  17. Greg Bamford (1989). Popper, Refutation and 'Avoidance' of Refutation. Dissertation, The University of Queensland
    Popper's account of refutation is the linchpin of his famous view that the method of science is the method of conjecture and refutation. This thesis critically examines his account of refutation, and in particular the practice he deprecates as avoiding a refutation. I try to explain how he comes to hold the views that he does about these matters; how he seeks to make them plausible; how he has influenced others to accept his mistakes, and how some of the ideas (...)
    Remove from this list |
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  18. Eric Barnes (1991). Beyond Verisimilitude: A Linguistically Invariant Basis for Scientific Progress. Synthese 88 (3):309 - 339.
    This paper proposes a solution to David Miller's Minnesotan-Arizonan demonstration of the language dependence of truthlikeness (Miller 1974), along with Miller's first-order demonstration of the same (Miller 1978). It is assumed, with Peter Urbach, that the implication of these demonstrations is that the very notion of truthlikeness is intrinsically language dependent and thus non-objective. As such, truthlikeness cannot supply a basis for an objective account of scientific progress. I argue that, while Miller is correct in arguing that the number of (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  19. Andrew Bartlett (1996). Tools for Change and Progress. Acm Sigcas Computers and Society 26 (3):28.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  20. Henry H. Bauer (2003). The Progress of Science and Implications for Science Studies and for Science Policy. Perspectives on Science 11 (2):236-278.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  21. William Bechtel (1984). The Evolution of Our Understanding of the Cell: A Study in the Dynamics of Scientific Progress. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 15 (4):309-356.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  22. Carl Lotus Becker (1965). Progress and Power. Vintage Books.
    Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  23. Carl Lotus Becker (1960). Progress and Power. Introd. By Leo Gershoy. Knopf.
    Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  24. D. K. Beliaev, A. P. Derevianko & Filologii I. Filosofii Institut Istorii (1985). Fundamental Nye Issledovaniia I Tekhnicheskii Progress. Nauka, Sibirskoe Otd-Nie.
    Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  25. J. B. Bengoetxea (2010). Crítica filosófica y progreso científico: cuatro ejemplos. Teorema: International Journal of Philosophy 29 (1).
    Remove from this list |
    Translate to English
    |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  26. Alexander Bird (2010). The Epistemology of Science—a Bird's-Eye View. Synthese 175 (1):5 - 16.
    In this paper I outline my conception of the epistemology of science, by reference to my published papers, showing how the ideas presented there fit together. In particular I discuss the aim of science, scientific progress, the nature of scientific evidence, the failings of empiricism, inference to the best (or only) explanation, and Kuhnian psychology of discovery. Throughout, I emphasize the significance of the concept of scientific knowledge.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  27. Alexander Bird (2008). Scientific Progress as Accumulation of Knowledge: A Reply to Rowbottom. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 39 (2):279-281.
    I defend my view that scientific progress is constituted by the accumulation of knowledge against a challenge from Rowbottom in favour of the semantic view that it is only truth that is relevant to progress.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  28. Alexander Bird (2007). What is Scientific Progress? Noûs 41 (1):64–89.
    I argue that scientific progress is precisely the accumulation of scientific knowledge.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (11 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  29. Richard J. Blackwell (1983). Scientific Progress: A Study Concerning the Nature of the Relation Between Successive Scientific Theory. Modern Schoolman 61 (1):59-59.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  30. Gregory Blue (2012). Customising Progress. Dialectics and Humanism 14 (3):79-89.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  31. Gernot Böhme (1987). An End to Progress? Graduate Faculty Philosophy Journal 12 (1/2):237-250.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  32. Hermann Bondi & Romano Harré (1975). Problems of Scientific Revolution Progress and Obstacles to Progress in the Sciences. Monograph Collection (Matt - Pseudo).
    Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  33. Giacomo Borbone (2013). Scientific Progress: The Principle of Dialectical Correspondence. Linguistic and Philosophical Investigations 12:111-121.
    Remove from this list | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  34. Ingo Brigandt, An Alternative to Kitcher's Theory of Conceptual Progress and His Account of the Change of the Gene Concept.
    The present paper discusses Kitcher’s framework for studying conceptual change and progress. Kitcher’s core notion of reference potential is hard to apply to concrete cases. In addition, an account of conceptual change as change in reference potential misses some important aspects of conceptual change and conceptual progress. I propose an alternative framework that focuses on the inferences and explanations supported by scientific concepts. The application of my approach to the history of the gene concept offers a better account of the (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  35. Richard M. Burian & J. D. Trout (1995). Ontological Progress in Science. Canadian Journal of Philosophy 25 (2):177 - 201.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  36. Wendell T. Bush (1928). A Professor's Progress. Journal of Philosophy 25 (19):513-521.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  37. Robert E. Butts (1979). Review Symposium : Scientific Progress: The Laudan Manifesto. Philosophy of the Social Sciences 9 (4):475-483.
  38. Martin Carrier, Laura Ruetsche & Gerald J. Massey (eds.) (2004). Science at Centurys End: Philosophical Questions on the Progress and Limits of S. University of Pittsburgh Press.
    Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  39. Chandler Carter (1996). The Rake’s Progress. American Journal of Semiotics 13 (1/4):183-225.
    Remove from this list | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  40. Gustavo Cevolani, Roberto Festa & Theo A. F. Kuipers (2013). Verisimilitude and Belief Change for Nomic Conjunctive Theories. Synthese 190 (16):3307-3324.
    In this paper, we address the problem of truth approximation through theory change, asking whether revising our theories by newly acquired data leads us closer to the truth about a given domain. More particularly, we focus on “nomic conjunctive theories”, i.e., theories expressed as conjunctions of logically independent statements concerning the physical or, more generally, nomic possibilities and impossibilities of the domain under inquiry. We define both a comparative and a quantitative notion of the verisimilitude of such theories, and identify (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  41. Gustavo Cevolani & Luca Tambolo (2013). Progress as Approximation to the Truth: A Defence of the Verisimilitudinarian Approach. Erkenntnis 78 (4):921-935.
    In this paper we provide a compact presentation of the verisimilitudinarian approach to scientific progress (VS, for short) and defend it against the sustained attack recently mounted by Alexander Bird (2007). Advocated by such authors as Ilkka Niiniluoto and Theo Kuipers, VS is the view that progress can be explained in terms of the increasing verisimilitude (or, equivalently, truthlikeness, or approximation to the truth) of scientific theories. According to Bird, VS overlooks the central issue of the appropriate grounding of scientific (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  42. Hasok Chang (2007). Scientific Progress: Beyond Foundationalism and Coherentism. Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplement 82 (61):1-20.
    Scientific progress remains one of the most significant issues in the philosophy of science today. This is not only because of the intrinsic importance of the topic, but also because of its immense difficulty. In what sense exactly does science makes progress, and how is it that scientists are apparently able to achieve it better than people in other realms of human intellectual endeavour? Neither philosophers nor scientists themselves have been able to answer these questions to general satisfaction.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  43. U. Charpa (1988). Scientific Progress. Philosophische Rundschau 35 (1-2):117-131.
    Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  44. Margaret Chatterjee (1976). Progress and Nature. Dialectics and Humanism 3 (1):67-71.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  45. J. M. Child (1916). Science Progress. The Monist 26:635.
    Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  46. Daryl E. Chubin (1986). Scientific Progress: An Interim Report. BioScience 36 (4):234-235.
    Remove from this list | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  47. Steve Clarke & Adrian Walsh (2014). Imperialism, Progress, Developmental Teleology, and Interdisciplinary Unification. International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 27 (3):341-351.
    In a previous article in this journal, we examined John Dupré's claim that ‘scientific imperialism’ can lead to ‘misguided’ science being considered acceptable. Here, we address criticisms raised by Ian J. Kidd and Uskali Mäki against that article. While both commentators take us to be offering our own account of scientific imperialism that goes beyond that developed by Dupré, and go on to criticise what they take to be our account, our actual ambitions were modest. We intended to ‘explicate the (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  48. Willson H. Coates (1948). What is Progress? Journal of Philosophy 45 (3):67-77.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  49. L. Jonathan Cohen (1973). Is the Progress of Science Evolutionary? [REVIEW] British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 24 (1):41-61.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  50. L. Jonathan Cohen (1973). Review: Is the Progress of Science Evolutionary? [REVIEW] British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 24 (1):41 - 61.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
1 — 50 / 291