Related categories
Subcategories:
1989 found
Search inside:
(import / add options)   Sort by:
1 — 50 / 1989
Material to categorize
  1. Theodore Arabatzis (2011). Integrating History and Philosophy of Science. Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science 263:125-139.
    In this chapter I investigate the prospects of integrated history and philosophy of science, by examining how philosophical issues raised by “hidden entities”, entities that are not accessible to unmediated observation, can enrich the historical investigation of their careers. Conversely, I suggest that the history of those entities has important lessons to teach to the philosophy of science. Hidden entities have played a crucial role in the development of the natural sciences. Despite their centrality to past scientific practice, however, several (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  2. Robert Arp, Barry Smith & Andrew Spear (forthcoming). Building Ontologies with Basic Formal Ontology. MIT Press, August 7, 2015.
    In the era of “big data,” science is increasingly information driven, and the potential for computers to store, manage, and integrate massive amounts of data has given rise to such new disciplinary fields as biomedical informatics. Applied ontology offers a strategy for the organization of scientific information in computer-tractable form, drawing on concepts not only from computer and information science but also from linguistics, logic, and philosophy. This book provides an introduction to the field of applied ontology that is of (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  3. Jodie A. Baird & Janet Wilde Astington (2005). The Development of the Intention Concept: From the Observable World to the Unobservable Mind. In Ran R. Hassin, James S. Uleman & John A. Bargh (eds.), The New Unconscious. Oxford University Press.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  4. Wolfgang Balzer, Carles Ulises Moulines & Joseph D. Sneed (1987). An Architectonic for Science the Structuralist Program. Monograph Collection (Matt - Pseudo).
    Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  5. Roy Bhaskar (1998). Philosophy and Scientific Realism. In Margaret Scotford Archer (ed.), Critical Realism: Essential Readings. Routledge. 16--47.
    Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  6. Richard J. Blackwell (1973). Edward A. MacKinnon , "The Problem of Scientific Realism". [REVIEW] The Thomist 37 (2):407.
    Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  7. Radu J. Bogdan (1973). Llkka Niiniluoto. In Radu J. Bogdan & Ilkka Niiniluoto (eds.), Logic, Language, and Probability. Boston,D. Reidel Pub. Co..
    Remove from this list |
    Translate to English
    |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  8. James Bogen (1989). On Being and Saying: Essays for Richard Cartwright. Philosophical Books 30 (2):92-94.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  9. Jesús Zamora Bonilla (2000). El naturalismo científico de Ronald Giere y Philip Kitcher. Revista de Filosofía (Madrid) 24 (1):169.
    Se discute el proyecto de la naturalización de la filosofía de la ciencia, a través de las teorías de Ronald Giere y Philip Kitcher. Ambas tienen en común la atención preferente que prestan a los procesos de decisión de los científicos individuales y la defensa de una concepción realista y racionalista de la ciencia. La comparación se lleva a cabo desde una triple perspectiva: su consideración como teorías darwinianas del desarrollo científico, su referencia a los modelos de la psicología cogni (...)
    Remove from this list |
    Translate to English
    | Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  10. Václav Černík & Jozef Viceník (2009). Historical Narrative: A Dispute Between Constructionism and Scientific Realism. Human Affairs 19 (2).
    Remove from this list | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  11. Stephen R. L. Clark & P. K. Feyerabend (1984). Philosophical PapersVol. I Realism, Rationalism & Scientific MethodVol. II Problems of Empiricism. Philosophical Quarterly 34 (135):172.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  12. Mariana Córdoba (2011). ¿Desarrollo progresivo de la ciencia sin continuidad referencial? Acerca del realismo de Psillos y la teoría del germoplasma de Weismann. Principia 14 (3):335-348.
    In this paper I argue for the idea that, throughout the history of science, there are some cases of theory change that would show how science develops with no referential continuity. For this purpose, I analyze Psillos’ proposal of a theory of reference used to account for referential continuity in conceptual transitions. This kind of continuity is requested by Psillos —as by other philosophers— in his defense of scientific realism. By means of a historical case, the theory of germplasm of (...)
    Remove from this list |
    Translate to English
    | Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  13. S. Coval (1967). SMART, J. J. C. - "Philosophy and Scientific Realism". [REVIEW] Mind 76:450.
    Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  14. James Deri (2003). A Different Conception of Scientific Realism: The Case for the Missing Explananda. Journal of Philosophy 100 (5):243-267.
    Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  15. W. Diederich (1994). The Semantic Conception of Theories and Scientific Realism. Erkenntnis 41 (3):421-426.
    Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  16. Alan Donagan (1975). Realism and Historical Instrumentalism. Revue Internationale de Philosophie 81 (111/112):78.
    Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  17. Igor Douven, Leon Horsten & Katholieke Universiteit te Leuven ) (1996). Realism in the Sciences Proceedings of the Ernan Mcmullin Symposium, Leuven, 1995.
    Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  18. The Editor The Editor (1926). The Despairs of a Scientific Age. Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 7 (4):233.
    Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  19. Matthias Egg (2014). 1 Scientific Realism and Its Relation to Common Sense. In Scientific Realism in Particle Physics: A Causal Approach. De Gruyter. 1-18.
    Remove from this list | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  20. Matthias Egg (2014). Scientific Realism in Particle Physics: A Causal Approach. De Gruyter.
    Remove from this list | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  21. Matthias Egg (2013). Inequivalent Representations Do Not Undermine Realism About Particles. Foundations of Physics 31.
    Remove from this list | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  22. Brigitte Falkenburg (2005). Some Remarks on Cosmology and Scientific Realism. Kairos 26.
    Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  23. James Farr (1991). Science: Realism, Criticism, History. In Terrell Carver (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Marx. Cambridge University Press. 106--123.
    Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  24. James H. Fetzer (1991). Frederick Suppe, The Semantic Conception of Theories and Scientific Realism Reviewed By. Philosophy in Review 11 (5):364-367.
    Remove from this list | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  25. P. Feyerabend (1992). Ethics as a Measure of Scientific Truth. In William R. Shea & Antonio Spadafora (eds.), From the Twilight of Probability: Ethics and Politics. Science History Publications, U.S.A.. 106--114.
    Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  26. P. K. Feyerabend (1984). Realism, Rationalism, and Scientific Method. Problems of Empiricism. Philosophical Review 93 (2):277-282.
    Remove from this list | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  27. Jeffrey Foss (1993). Ronald N. Giere, Ed., Cognitive Models of Science. [REVIEW] Philosophy in Review 13:311-315.
    Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  28. Jeffrey E. Foss (1993). Ronald N. Giere, Ed., Cognitive Models of Science Reviewed By. Philosophy in Review 13 (6):311-315.
    Remove from this list | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  29. Claudio Garola & Luigi Solombrino (1996). Semantic Realism Versus EPR-Like Paradoxes: The Furry, Bohm-Aharonov, and Bell Paradoxes. Foundations of Physics 26 (10):1329-1356.
    We prove that the general scheme for physical theories that we have called semantic realism(SR) in some previous papers copes successfully with a number of EPR-like paradoxes when applied to quantum physics (QP). In particular, we consider the old arguments by Furry and Bohm- Aharonov and show that they are not valid within a SR framework. Moreover, we consider the Bell-Kochen-Specker und the Bell theorems that should prove that QP is inherently contextual and nonlocal, respectively, and show that they can (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  30. A. Gedo (1986). The Materialist Dialectic and Scientific Realism-Meetings, Controversies, Problems. Filosoficky Casopis 34 (5):794-800.
    Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  31. Maryam Ghasemi Naraghi (forthcoming). Duhem and Scientific Realism. Philosophical Investigations.
    Remove from this list | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  32. Ronald N. Giere (2005). Is Realism Dead? Poznan Studies in the Philosophy of the Sciences and the Humanities 86 (1):287-304.
    Remove from this list | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  33. A. J. Gurevich (1987). On Pierre Duhem. Science in Context 1 (2).
    Remove from this list | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  34. Sandra Harding (1976). The Inconsistent Scientific Realist. Philosophical Studies 30 (3):203 - 205.
    Many philosophers who consider themselves scientific realists also argue for physicalism (quine is one). But if scientific realism is construed in such a way that it is logically independent of physicalism, One cannot consistently defend both positions. If it is construed so that it is not independent of physicalism, The problem is simply displaced to an incoherence within scientific realism. "historical physicalism" is what scientific realists should be defending. But so far no scientific realists have defended this version of physicalism.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  35. Rom Harré (1988). Scientific Method: Realism, Reference and Theory. Royal Institute of Philosophy Lectures 24:53-68.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  36. C. Held (2012). A Particularist Defence of Scientific Realism? Reply to Morganti. The Reasoner 6 (2).
    Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  37. Robin Findlay Hendry (2001). Are Realism and Instrumentalism Methodologically Indifferent? Proceedings of the Philosophy of Science Association 2001 (3):S25-.
    Arthur Fine and André Kukla have argued that realism and instrumentalism are indifferent with respect to scientific practice. I argue that this claim is ambiguous. One interpretation is that for any practice, the fact that that practice yields predictively successful theories is evidentially indifferent between scientific realism and instrumentalism. On the second construal, the claim is that for any practice, adoption of that practice by a scientist is indifferent between their being a realist or instrumentalist. I argue that there are (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  38. Eric D. Hetherington (2000). Kukla, Andre. Studies in Scientific Realism. Review of Metaphysics 53 (4):939-941.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  39. C. H. Hinton (1902). Scientific Romances. The Monist 12:149.
    Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  40. J. M. Hinton (1981). Scientific Realism and the Plasticity of Mind. Philosophical Books 22 (3):163-165.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  41. Max Hocutt (1997). Review: From Logical Positivism to Scientific Realism. [REVIEW] Behavior and Philosophy 25 (1):77 - 80.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  42. Maurice R. Holloway (1964). "Philosophy and Scientific Realism," by J. J. C. Smart. Modern Schoolman 42 (1):122-122.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  43. Paul Horwich (1991). On the Nature and Norms of Theoretical Commitment. Philosophy of Science 58 (1):1-14.
    It is not uncommon for philosophers to maintain that one is obliged to believe nothing beyond the observable consequences of a successful scientific theory. This doctrine is variously known as instrumentalism, fictionalism, constructive empiricism, theoretical skepticism and the philosophy of "as if". The purpose of the present paper is to subject such forms of scientific antirealism to a two-pronged critique. In the first place it is argued that there is no genuine difference between believing a theory and being disposed to (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  44. David L. Hull (2001). The Success of Science and Social Norms. History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences 23 (3/4):341 - 360.
    In this paper I characterize science in terms of both invisible hand social organization and selection. These two processes are responsible for different features of science. Individuals working in isolation cannot produce much in the way of the warranted knowledge. Individual biases severely limit how much secure knowledge an individual can generate on his or her own. Individuals working in consort are required, but social groups can be organized in many different ways. The key feature of the social organization in (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  45. Jeffrey Rogers Hummel (1990). Quantum Reality. International Philosophical Quarterly 30 (1):119-121.
  46. Steven Frederick Humphrey (1981). An Anti-Realist Conception of Theories of Mathematical Physics. Dissertation, The Ohio State University
    The main object of this essay is to present and defend an account of theorizing in the mathematical sciences. One important criterion to be used in evaluating such accounts is that they should capture the actual practice of current theorists. That is, the determinations made by a theory, construed according to some account of scientific theories, should correspond to the determinations made by practicing theorists. One widely accepted, traditional account of scientific theories is scientific realism, according to which theories are (...)
    Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  47. M. Z. J. (1978). The Scientific World-Perspective and Other Essays, 1931-1963. Review of Metaphysics 31 (4):662-663.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  48. R. H. K. (1970). Contemporary Philosophy (La Philosophie Contemporaine). Volume II, Philosophy of Science. Review of Metaphysics 23 (3):571-572.
    Remove from this list | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  49. Mikael Karlsson, Andre Kukla, Jarrett Leplin, David Papineau, Stathis Psillos & Howard Sankey (2006). Scientific Realism. In Patrick Greenough & Michael P. Lynch (eds.), Theoria. Oxford University Press. 35-54.
    Remove from this list | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  50. Jennifer Kevern (1982). General Practice Revisited. By Ann Cartwright and Robert Anderson. Pp. Xii + 228. (Tavistock, London, 1981.)£11.50. [REVIEW] Journal of Biosocial Science 14 (3):377-378.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
1 — 50 / 1989