 | 1 — 100 / 303 |  |
Distinguishing the Senses
- Jose Luis Bermudez (1999). Categorizing Qualitative States: Some Problems. Anthropology and Philosophy 3 (2).
- C. A. J. Coady (1974). The Senses of Martians. Philosophical Review 83 (1):107-125.
- D. E. Cooper (1970). Materialism and Perception. Philosophical Quarterly 20 (October):334-346.
- J. W. Roxbee Cox (1970). Distinguishing the Senses. Mind 79 (October):530-550.
- Louw Feenstra & Johannes Borgstein (2003). The Senses in Perspective. Ludus Vitalis 11 (20):135-157.
- Richard Gray (forthcoming). Is There a Space of Sensory Modalities? Erkenntnis.
- Richard Gray (2011). On the Nature of the Senses. In Fiona Macpherson (ed.), The Senses: Classical and Contemporary Readings. Oxford University Press.
- Richard Gray (2005). On the Concept of a Sense. Synthese 147 (3):461-475.
- H. P. Grice (1962). Some Remarks About the Senses. In R. J. Butler (ed.), Analytical Philosophy, First Series. Oxford University Press.
- Robert Hopkins (2011). Re-Imagining, Re-Viewing and Re-Touching. In Fiona McPherson (ed.), The senses: classic and contemporary philosophical perspectives.
- Brian L. Keeley (2002). Making Sense of the Senses: Individuating Modalities in Humans and Other Animals. Journal Of Philosophy 99 (1):5-28.
- Julian Kiverstein, Mirko Farina & Andy Clark (forthcoming). Substituting the Senses. In Mohan Matthen (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of the Philosophy of Perception. Oxford University Press.
- Mark Leon (1988). Characterising the Senses. Mind and Language 3 (4):243-70.
- Fiona Macpherson (forthcoming). The Space of Sensory Modalities. In D. Stokes S. Biggs & M. Matthen (eds.), Perception and Its Modalities.
- Fiona Macpherson (2011). Individuating the Senses. In Fiona Macpherson (ed.), The Senses: Classic and Contemporary Philosophical Perspectives. Oxford University Press.
- Fiona Macpherson (ed.) (2011). The Senses: Classic and Contemporary Philosophical Perspectives. Oxford University Press.
- Fiona Macpherson (2011). Taxonomising the Senses. Philosophical Studies 153 (1):123-142.
- Fiona Macpherson (ed.) (2011). The Senses: Classic and Contemporary Philosophical Perspectives. Oxford University Press.
- Olivier Massin (2010). L'objectivité du toucher. Dissertation, Aix-Marseille
- Mohan Matthen, The Individuation of the Senses.
- Norton Nelkin (1990). Categorizing the Senses. Mind and Language 5 (2):149-165.
- Matthew Nudds, Is Seeing Just Like Feeling? Kinds of Experiences and the Five Senses.
- Matthew Nudds (2011). The Senses as Psychological Kinds. In Fiona Macpherson (ed.), The Senses: Classic and Contemporary Philosophical Perspectives. Oxford.
- Matthew Nudds (2004). The Significance of the Senses. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 104 (1):31-51.
- Matthew Nudds (2000). Modes of Perceiving and Imagining. Acta Analytica 15 (24):139-150.
- John O'Dea (2011). A Proprioceptive Account of the Senses. In Fiona Macpherson (ed.), The Senses: Classical and Contemporary Philosophical Perspectives. Oxford University Press.
- Catherine Osborne (1998). Perceiving White and Sweet (Again): Aristotle, De Anima 3.7, 431a20-B1. The Classical Quarterly 48 (02):433-446.
- Catherine Osborne (1983). Aristotle, De Anima 3. 2: How Do We Perceive That We See and Hear? The Classical Quarterly 33 (02):401-411.
- Vincent Picciuto & Peter Carruthers (forthcoming). Inner-Sense. In Biggs S., Matthen M. & Stokes D. (eds.), Perception and its Modalites. Oxford University Press.
- P. Ross (2001). Qualia and the Senses. Philosophical Quarterly 51 (205):495-511.
- Peter W. Ross (2008). Common Sense About Qualities and Senses. Philosophical Studies 138 (3):299 - 316.
- Peter W. Ross (2001). Qualia and the Senses. Philosophical Quarterly 51 (205):495-511.
- Michael Scott (2007). Distinguishing the Senses. Philosophical Explorations 10 (3):257 – 262.
- Michel Serres (2009). The Five Senses: A Philosophy of Mingled Bodies (I). Continuum.
- David Vender (2010). Reid's Discovery of the Sense of Balance. Journal of Scottish Thought 3:23 - 40.
Vision
- R. B. Angell (1974). The Geometry of Visibles. Noûs 8 (2):87-117.
- Suzannah Biernoff (2002). Sight and Embodiment in the Middle Ages. Palgrave Macmillan.
- David Blinder (1986). A New Look at Vision. Topoi 5 (September):137-148.
- Vicki Bruce & Patrick Green (1985). Visual Perception: Physiology, Psychology, and Ecology. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
- Tyler Burge (1989). Marr's Theory of Vision. In Modularity in Knowledge Representation and Natural-Language Understanding. Cambridge: MIT Press.
- Paul M. Churchland (1995). Android Epistemology. Cambridge: MIT Press.
- Paul M. Churchland (1995). Machine Stereopsis: A Feedforward Network for Fast Stereo Vision with Movable Fusion Plane. In Android Epistemology. Cambridge: MIT Press.
- Austen Clark (1996). Three Varieties of Visual Field. Philosophical Psychology 9 (4):477-95.
- Phillip D. Cummins (1987). On the Status of Visuals in Berkeley's 'New Theory of Vision'. In Ernest Sosa (ed.), Essays on the Philosophy of George Berkeley. D. Reidel.
- John Dilworth (2002). Varieties of Visual Representation. Canadian Journal of Philosophy 32 (2):183-206.
- B. A. Farrell (1977). On the Psychological Explanation of Visual Perception. Synthese 35 (3):353 - 379.
- Vadim D. Glezer (1989). Vision and Mind. In Logic, Methodology and Philosophy of Science, VIII. New York: Elsevier Science.
- David W. Hamlyn (1957). The Visual Field and Perception, Part I. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 107:107-124.
- Gary C. Hatfield (2009). Perception and Cognition: Essays in the Philosophy of Psychology. Oxford University Press.
- Heiko Hecht, Robert Schwartz & Margaret Atherton (eds.) (2003). Looking Into Pictures. The Mit Press.
- Christopher S. Hill, Visual Awareness and Visual Qualia.
- Robert Hopkins (2000). Touching Pictures. British Journal of Aesthetics 40 (1):149-167.
- John Hyman (1986). The Cartesian Theory of Vision. Ratio 28 (December):149-167.
- James H. Hyslop (1888). On Wundt's Theory of Psychic Synthesis in Vision. Mind 13 (52):499-526.
- Tomis Kapitan (1998). Vision, Vector, Veracity. In Christian Strub (ed.), Blick Und Bild. Wilhelm Fink Verlag.
- A. C. Lloyd (1957). The Visual Field and Perception, Part II. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 125:125-144.
- Michael Martin (1992). Sight and Touch. In Tim Crane (ed.), The Contents of Experience. New York: Cambridge University Press.
- Mohan Matthen (2007). Defining Vision: What Homology Thinking Contributes. Biology and Philosophy 22 (5):675-689.
- Mohan P. Matthen (2005). Seeing, Doing, and Knowing: A Philosophical Theory of Sense Perception. Oxford University Press.
- Boyd Millar (2006). The Conflicted Character of Picture Perception. Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 64 (4):471–477.
- Richard Montgomery (1989). Discrimination, Reidentification and the Indeterminacy of Early Vision. Noûs 23 (September):413-435.
- Thomas Natsoulas (1998). Field of View. Journal of Mind and Behavior 19 (4):415-436.
- Thomas Natsoulas (1989). The Distinction Between Visual Perceiving and Visual Perceptual Experience. Journal of Mind and Behavior 10:37-61.
- Christopher New (1976). Look, No Eyes. Analysis 36 (March):137-141.
- Michael Pace (2007). Blurred Vision and the Transparency of Experience. Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 88 (3):328–354.
- Nicholas Pastore (1971). Selective History Of Theories Of Visual Perception, 1650-1950. Oxford University Press.
- Jean Petitot, Franscisco J. Varela, Barnard Pacoud & Jean-Michel Roy (eds.) (1999). Naturalizing Phenomenology. Stanford University Press.
- F. R. Pickering (1975). Is Light the Proper Object of Vision? Mind 84 (January):119-121.
- Dan Ryder, Explaining the "Inhereness" of Qualia Representationally: Why We Seem to Have a Visual Field.
- Robert Schwartz (1994). Vision: Variations on Some Berkeleian Themes. Cambridge: Blackwell.
- John Schwenkler (2013). Do Things Look the Way They Feel? Analysis 73 (1):86-96.
- John Schwenkler (2012). On the Matching of Seen and Felt Shape by Newly Sighted Subjects. I-Perception 3 (3):186-188.
- Michel Serres (2009). The Five Senses: A Philosophy of Mingled Bodies (I). Continuum.
- Barry Smith (1999). Truth and the Visual Field. In Jean Petitot (ed.), Naturalizing Phenomenology. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
- Ludovic Soutif (2008). Logical Space and the Space of Sight: The Relevance of Wittgenstein's Arguments to Recent Issues in the Philosophy of Mind. Dialogue 47 (3-4):501-536.
- Ludovic Soutif (2005). La Signification de Nicod Pour la Phénoménologie de Wittgenstein. Revue de Métaphysique Et de Morale (2):215-243.
- Dustin Stokes & Stephen Biggs (forthcoming). The Dominance of the Visual. In D. Stokes, M. Matthen & S. Biggs (eds.), Perception and its Modalities. Oxford University Press.
- Christian Strub (ed.) (1998). Blick Und Bild. Wilhelm Fink Verlag.
- Catherine Wilson (1993). Constancy, Emergence, and Illusions: Obstacles to a Naturalistic Theory of Vision. In Causation in Early Modern Philosophy. University Park: Penn St University Press.
- Catherine Wilson (1993). Causation in Early Modern Philosophy. University Park: Penn St University Press.
- Hugh R. Wilson (1991). Shadows on the Cave Wall: Philosophy and Visual Science. Philosophical Psychology 4 (1):65-78.
Hearing
- Mark DeBellis (1991). The Representational Content of Musical Experience. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 51 (June):303-24.
- A. Gritten (2012). Book Review: Sounds: A Philosophical Theory; Sounds and Perception: New Philosophical Essays. British Journal of Aesthetics 52 (4):430-434.
- Don Ihde (2007). Listening and Voice. Phenomenologies of Sound. Suny Press.
- Don Ihde (1982). On Hearing Shapes, Surfaces and Interiors. In Phenomenology Dialogues & Bridges. Suny.
- Don Ihde (1976). Listening And Voice: A Phenomenology Of Sound. Ohio University Press.
- Don Ihde (1966). Some Auditory Phenomena. Philosophy Today 10:227-235.
- Andrew Kania (2010). Review of Matthew Nudds, Casey O'Callaghan (Eds.), Sounds and Perception: New Philosophical Essays. [REVIEW] Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews 2010 (8).
- J. Kulvicki (2008). Review: Casey O'Callaghan: Sounds: A Philosophical Theory. [REVIEW] Mind 117 (468):1112-1116.
- Jason Leddington (2013). What We Hear. In Richard Brown (ed.), Consciousness Inside and Out: Phenomenology, Neuroscience, and the Nature of Experience. Springer Studies in Brain and Mind.
- Fiona Macpherson (1999). Perfect Pitch and the Content of Experience. Philosophy and Anthropology 3 (2).
- M. G. F. Martin (2012). Sounds and Images. British Journal of Aesthetics 52 (4):331-351.
- Mohan Matthen (2010). On the Diversity of Auditory Objects. Review of Philosophy and Psychology 1 (1):63-89.
- Hannes Ole Matthiessen (2010). Seeing and Hearing Directly. Review of Philosophy and Psychology 1 (1):91-103.
- Christopher Mole (2009). The Motor Theory of Speech Perception. In Matthew Nudds & Casey O'Callaghan (eds.), Sounds and Perception: New Philosophical Essays. Oxford University Press.
- Matthew Nudds & Casey O'Callaghan (eds.) (2010). Sounds and Perception: New Philosophical Essays. Oxford University Press.
- Matthew Nudds & Casey O'Callaghan (eds.) (2010). Sounds and Perception: New Philosophical Essays. Oxford University Press.
- Casey O'Callaghan, Pitch.
- Casey O'Callaghan (2013). Audible Independence and Binding. In Richard Brown (ed.), Consciousness Inside and Out: Phenomenology, Neuroscience, and the Nature of Experience. Springer Studies in Brain and Mind.
- Casey O'Callaghan (2011). Against Hearing Meanings. Philosophical Quarterly 61 (245):783-807.
 | 1 — 100 / 303 |  |
|
Off-campus access
Using PhilPapers from home?
Click here to configure this browser for off-campus access.
Monitor this page
Be alerted of all new items appearing on this page. Choose how you want to monitor it:
Email
|
RSS feed
|
|