This category needs an editor. We encourage you to help if you are qualified.
Volunteer, or read more about what this involves.
Related categories
Subcategories:
Adverbs (32)
Generics (67)
Nouns (265 | 96)
Questions (125)
Quotation (161)

7047 found
Search inside:
(import / add options)   Order:
1 — 50 / 7047
Material to categorize
  1. Barbara Abbott (2005). Proper Names and Language. In Greg N. Carlson & Francis Jeffry Pelletier (eds.), Reference and Quantification: The Partee Effect. Csli 1--19.
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  2. Dorit Abusch (2005). Causatives and Mixed Aspectual Type. In Greg N. Carlson & Francis Jeffry Pelletier (eds.), Reference and Quantification: The Partee Effect. Csli
    Remove from this list   Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  3. Dorit Abusch (1997). Sequence of Tense and Temporal de Re. Linguistics and Philosophy 20 (1):1-50.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   23 citations  
  4. S. Agesthialingom (1972). Nouns of the Badaga Language. Journal of the American Oriental Society 92 (2):276-279.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  5. AlexOliver & TimothySmiley (2001). Strategies for a Logic of Plurals. Philosophical Quarterly 51 (204):289–306.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  6. Keith Allan (1973). Complement Noun Phrases and Prepositional Phrases, Adjectives and Verbs. Foundations of Language 10 (3):377-397.
  7. Luis Alonso-Ovalle, Spanish de-Clauses Are Not Always in the Right Mood.
    The benchmark theory of conditionals maintains that conditionals quantify over a contextually restricted domain of worlds (Kratzer 1991). They are modal statements. The antecedent contributes to the interpretation of the whole conditional a proposition, a set of worlds. Conditionals quantify over a contextually restricted domain of worlds in which the proposition that the antecedent expresses is true. This is all antecedents do. In particular, the semantic import of its tense and mood inflection is neglected: it is - at most - (...)
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  8. Ron Artstein (2005). Quantificational Arguments in Temporal Adjunct Clauses. Linguistics and Philosophy 28 (5):541 - 597.
    Quantificational arguments can take scope outside of temporal adjunct clauses, in an apparent violation of locality restrictions: the sentence few secretaries cried after each executive resigned allows the quantificational NP each executive to take scope above few secretaries. I show how this scope relation is the result of local operations: the adjunct clause is a temporal generalized quantifier which takes scope over the main clause (Pratt and Francez, Linguistic and Philosophy 24(2), 187–222. [2001]), and within the adjunct clause, the quantificational (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   3 citations  
  9. Ron Artstein & Nissim Francez (2006). Plurality and Temporal Modification. Linguistics and Philosophy 29 (3):251 - 276.
    A semantics with plural entitles and plural times accounts for cumulative relations between plural arguments and temporal expressions. The semantics equips nominal, verbal and sentential meanings with temporal context variables and treats temporal modifiers as temporal generalized quantifiers; cumulative conjunction, however, takes place at types lower than generalized quantifiers. The mediation of temporal context variables allows cumulative relations to percolate between an argument in a main clause and one in a temporal clause, in apparent violation of locality restrictions. Plural times (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  10. Nicholas Asher, Ambiguity and Anaphora with Plurals in Discourse.
    We provide examples of plurals related to ambiguity and anaphora that pose problems or are counterexamples for current approaches to plurals. We then propose a dynamic semantics based on an extension of dynamic predicate logic to handle these examples. On our theory, different readings of sentences or discourses containing plurals don’t arise from a postulated ambiguity of plural terms or predicates applying to plural DPs, but follow rather from different types of dynamic transitions that manipulate inputs and outputs from formulas (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  11. Nicholas Asher & Daniel Bonevac (1987). Determiners and Resource Situations. Linguistics and Philosophy 10 (4):567 - 596.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  12. Jay Atlas (2004). Descriptions, Linguistic Topic/Comment, and Negative Existentials: A Case Study in the Application of Linguistic Theory to Problems in the Philosophy of Language. In Marga Reimer & Anne Bezuidenhout (eds.), Descriptions and Beyond. Oxford University Press 342--360.
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  13. Jay David Atlas (1977). Negation, Ambiguity, and Presupposition. Linguistics and Philosophy 1 (3):321 - 336.
    In this paper I argue for the Atlas-Kempson Thesis that sentences of the form The A is not B are not ambiguous but rather semantically general (Quine), non-specific (Zwicky and Sadock), or vague (G. Lakoff). This observation refutes the 1970 Davidson-Harman hypothesis that underlying structures, as full semantic representations, are logical forms. It undermines the conception of semantical presupposition, removes a support for the existence of truth-value gaps for presuppositional sentences (the remaining arguments for which are viciously circular), and lifts (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   11 citations  
  14. Johan Auwera (1993). 'Already' and 'Still': Beyond Duality. [REVIEW] Linguistics and Philosophy 16 (6):613 - 653.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  15. Edward W. Averill (1980). Why Are Colour Terms Primarily Used as Adjectives? Philosophical Quarterly 30 (January):19-33.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  16. Emmon Bach (1968). Nouns and Noun Phrases. In Emmon Bach & R. Harms (eds.), Universals in Linguistic Theory. Holt, Rinehart, and Winston 90--122.
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  17. Emmon Bach & Robin Cooper (1978). The NP-S Analysis of Relative Clauses and Compositional Semantics. Linguistics and Philosophy 2 (1):145 - 150.
    We have sketched how it is possible to give an analysis for adjoined relative clauses which is consistent with the compositionality principle and have shown that the technique which seems necessary for this analysis can be used to provide a compositional semantics for the NP-S analysis of English relative clauses.It is unlikely that anyone working within the framework of a compositional theory would choose the NP-S analysis for English, since it is clearly much less elegant and simple, in some intuitive (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  18. Mark Baker, On Gerunds and the Theory of Categories.
    Some recent theories of gerunds account for their hybrid properties by saying that the gerund is both a noun and a verb simultaneously. Such theories are inconsistent with the Reference-Predication Constraint (RPC), a cornerstone of Baker’s (2003) theory of lexical categories. In contrast, I defend the traditional idea that gerunds are fusions of a true verb and a syntactically distinct nominal Infl. Moreover, I give new evidence in favor of the RPC, showing how it explains the fact that nominal gerunds (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  19. Stephen J. Barker (1994). The Consequent-Entailment Problem Foreven If. Linguistics and Philosophy 17 (3):249 - 260.
    A comprehensive theory ofeven if needs to account for consequent ‘entailing’even ifs and in particular those of theif-focused variety. This is where the theory ofeven if ceases to be neutral between conditional theories. I have argued thatif-focusedeven ifs,especially if andonly if can only be accounted for through the suppositional theory ofif. Furthermore, a particular interpretation of this theory — the conditional assertion theory — is needed to account foronly if and a type of metalinguistic negation ofQ if P. We therefore (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  20. David Barner & Jesse Snedeker (2005). Quantity Judgments and Individuation: Evidence That Mass Nouns Count. Cognition 97 (1):41-66.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   10 citations  
  21. Elizabeth Lane Beardsley (1944). Imperative Sentences in Relation to Indicatives. Philosophical Review 53 (2):175-185.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   4 citations  
  22. Erika Benini (2015). Recensione E. Alloa, M. Fischer (a cura di), Leib und Sprache. Zur Reflexivität verkörperter Ausdrucksformen. [REVIEW] La Cultura: Rivista di filosofia, letteratura, storia:144-148.
  23. Erika Benini (2015). Recensione E. Alloa, M. Fischer (a cura di), Leib und Sprache. Zur Reflexivität verkörperter Ausdrucksformen. [REVIEW] La Cultura: Rivista di filosofia, letteratura, storia:144-148.
  24. Erika Benini (2015). Recensione E. Alloa, M. Fischer (a cura di), Leib und Sprache. Zur Reflexivität verkörperter Ausdrucksformen. [REVIEW] La Cultura: Rivista di filosofia, letteratura, storia:144-148.
  25. Jonathan Bennett (1994). The “Namely” Analysis of the “by”-Locution. Linguistics and Philosophy 17 (1):29 - 51.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   3 citations  
  26. Jonathan Bennett (1982). Even If. Linguistics and Philosophy 5 (3):403 - 418.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   10 citations  
  27. Paul Berckmans (1993). The Quantifier Theory Ofeven. Linguistics and Philosophy 16 (6):589 - 611.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (9 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  28. Angelika Bergien (2007). Iconicity and Economy as Creative Forces in Noun-Name Constructions. In Christian Todenhagen & Wolfgang Thiele (eds.), Nominalization, Nomination and Naming. Stauffenburg Verlag 44.
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  29. John C. Bigelow (1977). Semantics of Probability. Synthese 36 (4):459--72.
  30. Edward A. Bilodeau & Ina Mcd Bilodeau (1958). Variation of Temporal Intervals Among Critical Events in Five Studies of Knowledge of Results. Journal of Experimental Psychology 55 (6):603.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  31. Maria Bittner, Nominal (Re)Centering: From Kalaallisut to Uc.
    • A UC1-model M = 〈{Da| a ∈ Θ}, ⋅〉 assigns to each constant of type a, A ∈ Cona a value which is an object of type a, A ∈ Da.
    Remove from this list  
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  32. Andrea Bonomi (2002). Peter Ludlow, Semantics, Tense and Time, an Essay in the Metaphysics of Natural Language. Linguistics and Philosophy 25 (1):81-95.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  33. Emma Borg (2006). Reference Without Referents – R. M. Sainsbury. Ratio 19 (3):370–375.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  34. Denis Bouchard (1987). A Few Remarks on Past Participle Agreement. Linguistics and Philosophy 10 (4):449 - 474.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  35. Martin D. S. Braine (1979). On Some Claims Aboutif-Then. Linguistics and Philosophy 3 (1):35 - 47.
    The paper has sought to show two things. One is that the apparent variety of Stalnaker and Lewis's counterexamples is misleading. Several of their examples are quite unsatisfactory because they depend on unguarded language behavior. There is in fact only one type of counterexample that is worth serious discussion, and that has the form of Barense's.For Barense's example, I try to show that it fails as a counterexample to transitivity because one of the premisses is false within the context of (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  36. Michael K. Brame (1977). Alternatives to the Tensed S and Specified Subject Conditions. Linguistics and Philosophy 1 (3):381 - 411.
    The original evidence advanced to support the Tensed S Condition (TSC) and the Specified Subject Condition (SSC) in Chomsky's Conditions on Transformations is reconsidered and viable alternatives to these constraints are provided. It is shown that TSC and SSC, in some instances, lead to a loss of linguistically significant generalization. Satisfactory alternatives can account for the relevant range of data and provide a more general account of additional data. Finally, counterevidence to Subjacency and Superiority is adduced, but explicit alternatives to (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (8 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  37. Adrian Brasoveanu (2008). Donkey Pluralities: Plural Information States Versus Non-Atomic Individuals. Linguistics and Philosophy 31 (2):129-209.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  38. C. Brisson (2003). Plurals, All, and the Nonuniformity of Collective Predication. Linguistics and Philosophy 26 (2):129-184.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   10 citations  
  39. Alexander Broadie (1972). Imperatives. Mind 81 (322):179-190.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  40. Berit Brogaard (2010). Descriptions. In Oxford Annotated Bibliographies Online.
    Descriptions are phrases of the form ‘an F’, ‘the F’, ‘Fs’ and ‘the Fs’. They can be indefinite (e.g., ‘an F’ and ‘Fs’), definite (e.g. ‘the F’ and ‘the Fs’), singular (e.g., ‘an F’, ‘the F’) and plural (e.g., ‘the Fs’, ‘Fs’). In English plural indefinite descriptions lack an article and are for that reason also known as ‘bare plurals’.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  41. Berit Brogaard (2008). The Trivial Argument for Epistemic Value Pluralism. Or How I Learned to Stop Caring About Truth. In Adrian Haddock, Alan Millar & D. Pritchard (eds.), Epistemic Value. Oxford University Press
    Relativism offers a nifty way of accommodating most of our intuitions about epistemic modals, predicates of personal taste, color expressions, future contingents, and conditionals. But in spite of its manifest merits relativism is squarely at odds with epistemic value monism: the view that truth is the highest epistemic goal. I will call the argument from relativism to epistemic value pluralism the trivial argument for epistemic value pluralism. After formulating the argument, I will look at three possible ways to refute it. (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  42. Berit Brogaard (2007). Number Words and Ontological Commitment. Philosophical Quarterly 57 (226):1–20.
    With the aid of some results from current linguistic theory I examine a recent anti-Fregean line with respect to hybrid talk of numbers and ordinary things, such as ‘the number of moons of Jupiter is four’. I conclude that the anti-Fregean line with respect to these sentences is indefensible.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (8 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   12 citations  
  43. Brian Buccola & Benjamin Spector (2016). Modified Numerals and Maximality. Linguistics and Philosophy 39 (3):151-199.
    In this article, we describe and attempt to solve a puzzle arising from the interpretation of modified numerals like less than five and between two and five. The puzzle is this: such modified numerals seem to mean different things depending on whether they combine with distributive or non-distributive predicates. When they combine with distributive predicates, they intuitively impose a kind of upper bound, whereas when they combine with non-distributive predicates, they do not. We propose and explore in detail four solutions (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  44. Noel Burton-Roberts (1984). Modality and Implicature. Linguistics and Philosophy 7 (2):181 - 206.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   4 citations  
  45. C. Cacciari & M. C. Levorato (1991). Spilling the Beans on Childrens Comprehension and Production of Idioms. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society 29 (6):498-498.
  46. Elisabeth Camp & John Hawthorne (2008). Sarcastic ‘Like’: A Case Study in the Interface of Syntax and Semantics. Philosophical Perspectives 22 (1):1-21.
    The expression ‘Like’ has a wide variety of uses among English and American speakers. It may describe preference, as in (1) She likes mint chip ice cream. It may be used as a vehicle of comparison, as in (2) Trieste is like Minsk on steroids.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (8 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  47. Ben Caplan, Review of Terms and Truth. [REVIEW]
    Alan Berger’s Terms and Truth covers various expressionsparticularly names and anaphoric pronouns, but also demonstratives and general termsas they occur in various linguistic contexts, including identity sentences, belief ascriptions, and negative existentials. A central thesis of Berger’s book is that all of these expressions are rigid designators. (So I assume that Berger would say, contrary to what the subtitle might suggest, that anaphoric reference is direct reference.).
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  48. Wolfgang Carl (2014). 1. The Use of ‘I’ Sentences. In The First-Person Point of View. De Gruyter 27-54.
    Remove from this list   Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  49. Greg N. Carlson (1979). Generics and Atemporalwhen. Linguistics and Philosophy 3 (1):49 - 98.
    Beginning with analyses of English generic sentences and English plural indefinite noun phrases (e.g.dogs), we proceed to apply mechanisms there motivated to a characterization of atemporalwhen, a sense ofwhen which does not appear to involve time. Dealt with are such examples as Dogs are intelligent when they have blue eyes, and their relationships to examples like Dogs that have blue eyes are intelligent. The proposed treatment of atemporalwhen helps motivate the existence of a generic verb phrase operator in English, as (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   5 citations  
  50. Greg N. Carlson (1977). A Unified Analysis of the English Bare Plural. Linguistics and Philosophy 1 (3):413 - 456.
    It is argued that the English bare plural (an NP with plural head that lacks a determiner), in spite of its apparently diverse possibilities of interpretation, is optimally represented in the grammar as a unified phenomenon. The chief distinction to be dealt with is that between the generic use of the bare plural (as in Dogs bark) and its existential or indefinite plural use (as in He threw oranges at Alice). The difference between these uses is not to be accounted (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   22 citations  
1 — 50 / 7047