This category needs an editor. We encourage you to help if you are qualified.
Volunteer, or read more about what this involves.
Related categories
Siblings:
3 found
Search inside:
(import / add options)   Sort by:
  1. Julia Driver (1992). The Suberogatory. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 70 (3):286 – 295.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  2. Hallie Rose Liberto (2012). Denying the Suberogatory. Philosophia 40 (2):395-402.
    Julia Driver has argued that there is a special set of actions, lodged between neutral actions and wrongful actions called suberogatory actions. These actions are not impermissible, according to Driver, but still strike us as troubling or bad, and are therefore worse than morally neutral (1992). Since this paper was written 20 years ago, many philosophers have utilized or alluded to this moral territory. The existence of some action-types that are not wrong but still carry some dis-value has become a (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  3. John Turri (2013). Knowledge and Suberogatory Assertion. Philosophical Studies (3):1-11.
    I accomplish two things in this paper. First I expose some important limitations of the contemporary literature on the norms of assertion and in the process illuminate a host of new directions and forms that an account of assertional norms might take. Second I leverage those insights to suggest a new account of the relationship between knowledge and assertion, which arguably outperforms the standard knowledge account.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation