Bookmark and Share

The Passage of Time

Edited by Stephan Torre (University of Aberdeen, Northern Institute of Philosophy)
Related categories
Subcategories:
805 found
Search inside:
(import / add options)   Sort by:
1 — 50 / 805
Material to categorize
  1. J. K. Barthakur (1995). A Theory of Time. Indian Philosophical Quarterly 22 (4):271-290.
    Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  2. Kirsten Berkenkotter (forthcoming). Using UML 2.0 in Real-Time Development. A Critical Review.
    Remove from this list | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  3. Evander Bradley McGilvary (1914). Time and the Experience of Time. Philosophical Review 23 (2):121-145.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  4. Michael K. Brame (1977). Alternatives to the Tensed S and Specified Subject Conditions. Linguistics and Philosophy 1 (3):381 - 411.
    The original evidence advanced to support the Tensed S Condition (TSC) and the Specified Subject Condition (SSC) in Chomsky's Conditions on Transformations is reconsidered and viable alternatives to these constraints are provided. It is shown that TSC and SSC, in some instances, lead to a loss of linguistically significant generalization. Satisfactory alternatives can account for the relevant range of data and provide a more general account of additional data. Finally, counterevidence to Subjacency and Superiority is adduced, but explicit alternatives to (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download (8 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  5. S. G. F. Brandon (1951). Time and Mankind. New York, Hutchinson.
    Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  6. Stephen E. Braude (1974). Are Verbs Tensed or Tenseless? Philosophical Studies 25 (6):373 - 390.
    We have seen that we cannot de-tense a sentence like (15) simply by changing its verb, since the tense of such a sentence is determined by a temporal adverb. More importantly, we have seen that de-tensing is a process of removing certain temporal restrictions from the truth-conditions of tensed sentences, and that tensed and tenseless forms of a verb do not differ in sense. Once we understand this, and once we realize that it is an historical accident that the tense (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  7. Stephen E. Braude (1973). Tensed Sentences and Free Repeatability. Philosophical Review 82 (2):188-214.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  8. C. D. Broad (1931). McTaggart's Principle of the Dissimilarity of the Diverse. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 32:41 - 52.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  9. Berit Brogaard (2006). Tensed Relations. Analysis 66 (3):194-202.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  10. Berit Brogaard (2006). Tensed Relations. Analysis 66 (3):194–202.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  11. Richard A. Burbank (2011). Questions About Time: Time and its Subjective Foundations. Richard A. Burbank.
    Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  12. Jeremy Butterfield (1998). Seeing the Present. In Robin Le Poidevin (ed.), Mind. Oxford: Clarendon Press. 161-176.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  13. William R. Carter & H. Scott Hestevold (1994). On Passage and Persistence. American Philosophical Quarterly 31 (4):269 - 283.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  14. Jonathan Cohen (1954). The Experience of Time. Acta Psychologica 10:207-19.
  15. Denis Corish (2011). Earlier and Later If and Only If Past, Present and Future. Philosophy 86 (1):41-58.
    To prove the equivalence one must start with one side, and the earlier-later side seems, for starting with, logically the clearer. The equivalence is provable on reasonable definitions of ‘past’, ‘present’ and ‘future’ in terms of the earlier-later structure of time. McTaggart's attempted distinction between the past-present-future A series and the earlier-later B series, as though they were rivals for the structure of time, is based on an unexamined, and false, assumption. The equivalence shows they are not rivals; they are (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  16. Fabrice Correia & Sven Rosenkranz (2012). Eternal Facts in an Ageing Universe. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 90 (2):307 - 320.
    In recent publications, Kit Fine devises a classification of A-theories of time and defends a non-standard A-theory he calls fragmentalism, according to which reality as a whole is incoherent but fragments into classes of mutually coherent tensed facts. We argue that Fine's classification in not exhaustive, as it ignores another non-standard A-theory we dub dynamic absolutism, according to which there are tensed facts that stay numerically the same and yet undergo qualitative changes as time goes by. We expound this theory (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  17. William Lane Craig (2001). Wishing It Were Now Some Other Time. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 62 (1):159-166.
    One of the most serious obstacles to accepting a tenseless view of time is the challenge posed by our experience of tense. A particularly striking example of such experience, pointed out by Schlesinger but largely overlooked in the literature, is the wish felt by probably all of us at some time or other that it were now some other time. Such a wish seems evidently rational to hold, and yet on a tenseless theory of time such a wish must be (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download (9 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  18. William Lane Craig (1998). The Tensed Vs. Tenseless Theory of Time: A Watershed for the Conception of Divine Eternity. In Robin Le Poidevin (ed.), Questions of Time and Tense. Oxford University Press.
    Remove from this list | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  19. William Lane Craig (1997). Is Presentness a Property? American Philosophical Quarterly 34 (1):27 - 40.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  20. Thomas Crisp (2005). Review of L. Nathan Oaklander, The Ontology of Time. [REVIEW] Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews 2005 (3).
    Remove from this list | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  21. Yuval Dolev (1997). Time From the Metaphysical and Anti-Metaphysical Viewpoints. Dissertation, Harvard University
    The idea that the present is "ontologically privileged" can be traced back to texts as early as St. Augustine's Confessions and Aristotle's Physics. The issue of the ontological status of tense continues to set the agenda in contemporary philosophy of time, which is dominated by two views. Proponents of the Tenseless View argue that all events are, in the timeless sense of 'are', equally real. Defenders of the rival Tensed View maintain that only present events are real, and that the (...)
    Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  22. Heather Dyke (2002). The Tensed Theory of Time. International Philosophical Quarterly 42 (3):404-406.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  23. Heather Dyke (1999). Time, Tense, and Causation. International Philosophical Quarterly 39 (1):100-101.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  24. Paul Fitzgerald (1987). Real Time. International Studies in Philosophy 19 (3):102-103.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  25. R. M. Gale (2000). LE POIDEVIN, R.-Questions of Time and Tense. Philosophical Books 41 (4):273-274.
    Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  26. Richard M. Gale (1977). A Reply to Oaklander. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 38 (2):234-238.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  27. Peter Geach (1995). Cambridge Philosophers III: McTaggart. Philosophy 70 (274):567 - 579.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  28. W. Godfrey-Smith (1983). ELLOR, D. H.: "Real Time". [REVIEW] Australasian Journal of Philosophy 61:109.
    Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  29. Jerzy Gołosz (2010). Czy istnieje upływ czasu? Filozofia Nauki 4.
    The article explores the strategy of reconciliation of the idea of objective flow of time with science. In the first part of my paper, I analyze different conceptions of the passage of time and ponder on how we should understand it. The second part is de-voted to the problem whether there is the passage of time in science.
    Remove from this list |
    Translate to English
    |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  30. Ronald Gruber (2008). Neurophysics of the Flow of Time. Journal of Mind and Behavior 29 (3):241-255.
    Three physical theories explaining the flow of time are examined. One theory suggests that “flow” is associated with the manner of information transfer between registers within the brain. Different robotic systems are predicted to experience different types of flow. Here, human examples are found to support the theory and the model is modified suggesting that flow is a cognitive illusion. A second theory suggests that time is non-existent, that the universe is a complex quantum state which, upon observation, the brain (...)
    Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  31. Ronald P. Gruber & Richard A. Block (2013). The Flow of Time as a Perceptual Illusion. Journal of Mind and Behavior 34 (1):91-100.
    Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  32. R. F. Alfred Hoernlé (1926). Notes: Dr. Mctaggart and "Idealism". Mind 35 (137):129-130.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  33. Ronald W. Houts (1980). Some Implications of the Time-Lag Argument. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 41 (1/2):150-157.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  34. Nick Huggett (1996). Quentin Smith and L. Nathan Oaklander, Time, Change and Freedom: Introduction to Metaphysics Reviewed By. Philosophy in Review 16 (4):297-298.
    Remove from this list | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  35. Kasia M. Jaszczolt & Louis de Saussure (eds.) (2013). Time: Language, Cognition & Reality. Oup Oxford.
    Linguists and philosophers examine the representation of temporal reference; the interaction of the temporal information from tense, aspect, modality, and context; and the representation of the temporal relations between facts, events, states, propositions, and utterances. They link this to current research in psychology and anthropology.
    Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  36. Aleksandar Jokic (2003). The Tensed or Tenseless Existence of Nature. Philo 6 (2):205-210.
    In the debate between those who hold the tensed theory and those who hold the tenseless theory of time, Arthur Prior’s famous “Thank Goodness Argument” has had a special place. Initially designed to help tensers, it has seen its fortune change many times. In this paper the focus is on a methodological aspect of the argument. The purpose is to defend the “new reading” of the argument, which is intended to resolve an ontological issue by focusing on an epistemic fact, (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  37. Stuart Jones (2012). Now? Towards a Phenomenology of Real Time Sonification. AI and Society 27 (2):223-231.
    The author examines concepts of real time and real-time in relation to notions of perception and processes of sonification. He explores these relationships in three case studies and suggests that sonification can offer a form of reconciliation between ontology and phenomenology, and between ourselves and the flux we are part of.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  38. S. V. Keeling (1938). Mctaggart's Nature of Existence, Vol. I. Comments and Amendments. Mind 47 (188):547-550.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (8 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  39. Sean D. Kelly (forthcoming). Time and Experience. In A. Brooks & Kathleen Akins (eds.), Philosophy and the Neurosciences. Cambridge.
    Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  40. A. R. Lacey (1955). The Mathematical Passage in the Epinomis 1). Phronesis 1 (2):81-104.
  41. William Lane Craig (1999). Oaklander on McTaggart and Intrinsic Change. Analysis 59 (264):319-320.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  42. Nathaniel Lawrence (1975). Temporal Passage and Spatial Metaphor. In J. T. Fraser & Nathaniel M. Lawrence (eds.), The Study of Time Ii. Springer-Verlag. 196--205.
    Remove from this list | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  43. R. Le Poidevin (1997). Smith, Q;. And Oaklander, LN-Time, Change and Freedom. Philosophical Books 38:77-79.
    Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  44. Robin le Poidevin (1996). The New Theory of Time. International Philosophical Quarterly 36 (1):111-112.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  45. Henry Margenau (1954). Can Time Flow Backwards? Philosophy of Science 21 (2):79-92.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  46. Ned Markosian (1990). Does Time Pass? Dissertation, University of Massachusetts Amherst
    My topic is the question 'Does time pass?'. Although much has been written in attempts to answer this question, not enough attention has been paid to the asking of the question itself. As a result, it has not been clear exactly what is at issue in this matter, and, consequently, it has not been clear just what are the different views available to one who wishes to give an answer to the question. I hope to ameliorate this situation. ;The aims (...)
    Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  47. Meredith McGehee (2006). A Dangerous Passage. Teaching Ethics 6 (2):83-86.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  48. Evander Bradley McGilvary (1914). Time and the Experience of Time. Philosophical Review 23 (2):121-145.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  49. D. H. Mellor (1998). Time, Tense, and Causation. [REVIEW] Philosophy 73 (4):629-645.
    Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  50. D. H. Mellor (1986). History Without the Flow of Time. Neue Zeitschrift Für Systematische Theologie Und Religionsphilosophie 28 (1):68-76.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
1 — 50 / 805