Bookmark and Share

Universals

Edited by Gabriele Contessa (Carleton University)
Related categories
Siblings:
561 found
Search inside:
(import / add options)   Sort by:
1 — 50 / 561
  1. A. (1980). Nominalism and Realism: Universals and Scientific Realism. [REVIEW] Review of Metaphysics 33 (3):615-616.
    Remove from this list | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  2. R. I. Aaron (1941). Hume's Theory of Universals. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 42:117 - 140.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  3. Richard I. Aaron (1965). Wittgenstein's Theory of Universals. Mind 74 (294):249-251.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  4. Richard Ithamar Aaron (1952). The Theory of Universals. Oxford [Eng.]Clarendon Press.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  5. Richard Ithamar Aaron (1947/1975). Our Knowledge of Universals. Haskell House Publishers.
    Remove from this list | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  6. H. B. Acton (1937). The Theory of Concrete Universals (II.). Mind 46 (181):1-13.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  7. H. B. Acton (1936). The Theory of Concrete Universals. Mind 45 (180):417-431.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  8. H. B. Acton (1936). The Theory of Concrete Universals (I.). Mind 45 (180):1-13.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  9. Joseph Agassi & Paul T. Sagal (1975). The Problem of Universals. Philosophical Studies 28 (4):289 - 294.
    The pair democreteanism-Platonism (nothing/something is outside space-Time) differs from the pair nominalism-Realism (universals are/are not nameable entities). Nominalism need not be democretean, And democreateanism is nominalist only if conceptualism is rejected. Putnam's critique of nominalism is thus invalid. Quine's theory is democretean-When-Possible: quine is also a minimalist platonist. Conceptualists and realists agree that universals exist but not as physical objects. Nominalists accept universals only as "facons de parler".
    Remove from this list | Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  10. R. Ainscough (1929). Relations and Universals. Mind 38 (150):137-160.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (8 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  11. Erik Åkerlund (2009). Suárez on Forms, Universals and Understanding. Studia Neoaristotelica 6 (2):159-182.
    Suarezii de formis, universalibus, notitia intellectiva sententiaSententia Suarezii circa quaestionem famosam de statu universalium variissimis modis ab diversis interpretibus exponi solet. In disertatio quidem proposita res paulo aliter pertractatur, a Suarezii metaphysica doctrina de formis substantialibus et de cognitione intellectiva ac sctientia exeundo. Quae Suarezii doctrinae diligenti analysi subiciuntur earumque conexio consideratur. Respectu quaestione supradicta, scil. quaenam fuit vera Suarezii de statu universalium sententia, arguitur, Suarezium nominalismum moderatum professum esse, quae conclusio suadetur ex doctrinis suis de formis substantialibus et de (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  12. Edwin B. Allaire (1960). Existence, Independence and Universals. Philosophical Review 69 (4):485-496.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  13. James W. Allard (2007). Sprigge's Vindication of Concrete Universals. In Pierfrancesco Basile & Leemon B. McHenry (eds.), Consciousness, Reality and Value: Essays in Honour of T.L.S. Sprigge. Ontos.
    Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  14. Jose Tomas Alvarado Marambio (2010). The Function of Universals in Modal Metaphysics. Teorema 29 (3):77-101.
    Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  15. José Alvarado (2011). Universales estructurales. Manuscrito 34 (2):469-519.
    The work presents the concept of a structural universal and the criticisms that have been leveled against it. A structural universal is a property had by an individual due to the nature of its proper parts and due to the relations obtaining between those parts. Mellor has argued that there is no reason to accept such universal in addition to the basic universals that compose them. David Lewis has argued –on the other hand– that it has not been satisfactorily explained (...)
    Remove from this list |
    Translate to English
    | Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  16. Clifford Amyx (1947). The Iconic Sign in Aesthetics. Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 6 (1):54-60.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  17. Christoph Antweiler (2007). Was Ist den Menschen Gemeinsam?: Über Kultur Und Kulturen. Wbg, Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft.
    Remove from this list |
    Translate to English
    |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  18. Peter C. Appleby (1992). The Problem of Universals. Review of Metaphysics 46 (2):421-422.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  19. Chrudzimski Arkadiusz (2002). Two Concepts of Trope. Grazer Philosophische Studien 64 (1):137-155.
    The concept of a trope (understood as an individual property and not as a figure of speech) plays an important role in contemporary analytical metaphysics. It is, however, often far from clear what the logic of this concept really is. Indeed, there are two equally important intuitions underlying the concept of trope, two intuitions that generate two quite different conceptual frameworks. According to the first intuition, a trope is a particularised property – a property taken as an individual aspect of (...)
    Remove from this list |
    Translate to English
    | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  20. Andrew W. Arlig (2011). Universals. In H. Lagerlund (ed.), Encyclopedia of Medieval Philosophy. Springer. 1353--1359.
    Remove from this list | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  21. D. M. Armstrong (2010). Sketch for a Systematic Metaphysics. Oxford University Press.
    David Armstrong sets out his metaphysical system in a set of concise and lively chapters each dealing with one aspect of the world.
    Remove from this list | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  22. D. M. Armstrong (2004). Selection From Universals: An Opinionated Introduction. In Tim Crane & Katalin Farkas (eds.), Metaphysics: A Guide and Anthology. Oup Oxford.
    Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  23. D. M. Armstrong (1993). A World of States of Affairs. Philosophical Perspectives 7 (3):429-440.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  24. D. M. Armstrong (1989). Universals: An Opinionated Introduction. Westview Press.
    In this short text, a distinguished philosopher turns his attention to one of the oldest and most fundamental philosophical problems of all: How it is that we are able to sort and classify different things as being of the same natural class? Professor Armstrong carefully sets out six major theories—ancient, modern, and contemporary—and assesses the strengths and weaknesses of each. Recognizing that there are no final victories or defeats in metaphysics, Armstrong nonetheless defends a traditional account of universals as the (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  25. D. M. Armstrong (1986). In Defence of Structural Universals. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 64 (1):85 – 88.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  26. D. M. Armstrong (1982). Laws of Nature as Relations Between Universals and as Universals. Philosophical Topics 13 (1):7-24.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  27. D. M. Armstrong (1978). Naturalism, Materialism and First Philosophy. Philosophia 8 (2-3):261-276.
    First, The doctrine of naturalism, That reality is spatio-Temporal, Is defended. Second, The doctrine of materialism or physicalism, That this spatio-Temporal reality involves nothing but the entities of physics working according to the principles of physics, Is defended. Third, It is argued that these doctrines do not constitute a "first philosophy." a satisfactory first philosophy should recognize universals, In the form of instantiated properties and relations. Laws of nature are constituted by relations between universals. What universals there are, And what (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  28. D. M. Armstrong (1978). Universals and Scientific Realism. Cambridge University Press.
    v. 1. Nominalism and realism.--v. 2. A theory of universals.
    Remove from this list | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  29. D. M. Armstrong (1975). Towards a Theory of Properties: Work in Progress on the Problem of Universals. Philosophy 50 (192):145 - 155.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  30. D. M. Armstrong (1974). Infinite Regress Arguments and the Problem of Universals. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 52 (3):191 – 201.
    What is it for a particular to have a property? many proposed analyses of this situation may be called relational accounts. The particular has some relation, R, To some entity p. R may be the relation of falling under, Being a member of, Resembling or "participating." p may be a predicate, A concept, A class, A paradigm instance or a form. A number of arguments seek to prove that all these accounts are involved in various vicious infinite regresses. These arguments (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  31. David M. Armstrong (2005). Four Disputes About Properties. Synthese 144 (3):1-12.
    In considering the nature of properties four controversial decisions must be made. (1) Are properties universals or tropes? (2) Are properties attributes of particulars, or are particulars just bundles of properties? (3) Are properties categorical (qualitative) in nature, or are they powers? (4) If a property attaches to a particular, is this predication contingent, or is it necessary? These choices seem to be in a great degree independent of each other. The author indicates his own choices.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  32. David M. Armstrong (1978). Universals and Scientific Realism: A Theory of Universals Vol. Ii. Cambridge University Press.
  33. David M. Armstrong (1978). Universals and Scientific Realism: Nominalism and Realism Vol. I. Cambridge University Press.
  34. David Malet Armstrong (1978). Nominalism and Realism. Universals and Scientific Realism Volume I. Cambridge University Press.
    Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  35. David Malet Armstrong (1978). A Theory of Universals. Universals and Scientific Realism Volume Ii. Cambridge University Press.
    Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  36. Scott Atran (1999). Itzaj Maya Folkbiological Taxonomy: Cognitive Universals and Cultural Particulars. In D. Medin & S. Atran (eds.), Folkbiology. Mit Press. 119--213.
    Remove from this list | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  37. Bruce Aune (2002). Universals and Predication. In Richard M. Gale (ed.), The Blackwell Guide to Metaphysics. Blackwell Publishers. 131.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  38. A. J. Ayer (1933). On Particulars and Universals. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 34:51 - 62.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  39. M. B. B. (1975). Alessandro Achillini (1463-1512) and His Doctrine of 'Universals' and 'Transcendentals.' a Study in Renaissance Ockhamism. [REVIEW] Review of Metaphysics 29 (2):347-349.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  40. R. J. B. (1962). Modes of Referring and the Problem of Universals. Review of Metaphysics 15 (3):529-529.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  41. Emmon Bach & R. Harms (eds.) (1968). Universals in Linguistic Theory. Holt, Rinehart, and Winston.
    Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  42. Allan Bäck (1995). Five Texts on the Mediaeval Problem of Universals. Review of Metaphysics 49 (2):437-438.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  43. John Bacon (1995). Universals and Property Instances: The Alphabet of Being. Blackwell.
    Remove from this list | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  44. John Bacon (1986). Armstrong's Theory of Properties. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 64 (1):47 – 53.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  45. Roger Bacon (1989). Three Treatments of Universals. Center for Medieval and Early Renaissance Studies, State University of New York at Binghamton.
  46. Mads Anders Baggesgaard (2011). Competing Universals. In Mads Anders Baggesgaard & Jakob Ladegaard (eds.), Confronting Universalities: Aesthetics and Politics Under the Sign of Globalisation. Aarhus University Press.
    Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  47. Mads Anders Baggesgaard & Jakob Ladegaard (eds.) (2011). Confronting Universalities: Aesthetics and Politics Under the Sign of Globalisation. Aarhus University Press.
    Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  48. Raja Bahlul (2009). Avicenna and the Problem of Universals. Philosophy and Theology 21 (1/2):3-25.
    The main object of this paper is to clarify and evaluate Avicenna’s view of universals, in light of some modern and contemporarydiscussions. According to Avicenna, universality is a contingent attribute of entities that are in themselves neither universal norparticular. An account of universality as a contingent attribute is offered which clarifies and gives additional support to Avicenna’sview. Nevertheless, it will be argued that Avicenna, through his use of such terms as “nature” and “quiddity,” faces the same problemswhich he attributes to (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  49. Mieke Bal (2011). A Thousand And One Voices. In Mads Anders Baggesgaard & Jakob Ladegaard (eds.), Confronting Universalities: Aesthetics and Politics Under the Sign of Globalisation. Aarhus University Press.
    Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  50. Renford Bambrough (1960). Universals and Family Resemblances. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 61:207 - 222.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
1 — 50 / 561