- Don Adams (2004). Aquinas and Modern Consequentialism. International Journal of Philosophical Studies 12 (4):395 – 417.
- Robin Attfield (2005). Biocentric Consequentialism and Value-Pluralism: A Response to Alan Carter. Utilitas 17 (1):85-92.
- Robin Attfield (2003). Biocentric Consequentialism, Pluralism, and 'The Minimax Implication': A Reply to Alan Carter. Utilitas 15 (01):76-.
- David Braddon-Mitchell, Freedom and Binding Consequentialism.
- Ben Bradley (2005). Virtue Consequentialism. Utilitas 17 (3):282-298.
- Campbell Brown (2005). Blameless Wrongdoing and Agglomeration: A Response to Streumer. Utilitas 17 (2):222-225.
- Erik Carlson (1999). Consequentialism, Alternatives, and Actualism. Philosophical Studies 96 (3):253-268.
- Alan Carter (2005). Inegalitarian Biocentric Consequentialism, the Minimax Implication and Multidimensional Value Theory: A Brief Proposal for a New Direction in Environmental Ethics. Utilitas 17 (1):62-84.
- Peter Caws (1995). Minimal Consequentialism. Philosophy 70 (273):313 - 339.
- Richard Yetter Chappell (forthcoming). Fittingness: The Sole Normative Primitive. Philosophical Quarterly.
- David Cummiskey (2009). Joseph Mendola, Goodness and Justice: A Consequentialist Moral Theory (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006), Pp. IX + 326. Utilitas 21 (4):521-525.
- David Cummiskey (1990). Kantian Consequentialism. Ethics 100 (3):586-615.
- A. L. M. David (2008). Consequentialism and the Autonomy of the Deontic. Utilitas 20 (2):199-216.
- Richard Dean (2000). Cummiskey's Kantian Consequentialism. Utilitas 12 (01):25-.
- Ben Eggleston (2005). Reformulating Consequentialism: Railton's Normative Ethics. [REVIEW] Philosophical Studies 126 (3):449 - 462.
- Fred Feldman (1995). Adjusting Utility for Justice: A Consequentialist Reply to the Objection From Justice. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 55 (3):567-585.
- Robert Guay, Forms of Consequentialism. Copyright ©2003.
- Edmund Henden (2007). Restrictive Consequentialism and Real Friendship. Ratio 20 (2):179–193.
- Frances Howard-Snyder (1994). The Heart of Consequentialism. Philosophical Studies 76 (1):107 - 129.
- Philip J. Ivanhoe (1991). Character Consequentialism: An Early Confucian Contribution to Contemporary Ethical Theory. Journal of Religious Ethics 19 (1):55 - 70.
- Frank Jackson (1991). Decision-Theoretic Consequentialism and the Nearest and Dearest Objection. Ethics 101 (3):461-482.
- Dale Jamieson & Robert Elliot (2009). Progressive Consequentialism. Philosophical Perspectives 23 (1):241-251.
- Joel J. Kupperman (1980). Vulgar Consequentialism. Mind 89 (355):321-337.
- Rob Lawlor (2009). The Rejection of Scalar Consequentialism. Utilitas 21 (1):100-116.
- Elinor Mason (2007). Review of Joseph Mendola, Goodness and Justice: A Consequentialist Moral Theory. [REVIEW] Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews 2007 (8).
- Brian Mcelwee (2010). Consequentialism and Permissibility. Utilitas 22 (2):171-183.
- Joseph Mendola (2006). Goodness and Justice: A Consequentialist Moral Theory. Cambridge University Press.
- Joseph Mendola (2006). Multiple-Act Consequentialism. Noûs 40 (3):395–427.
- Joseph Mendola (2005). Consequentialism, Group Acts, and Trolleys. Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 86 (1):64–87.
- Seiriol Morgan (2009). Can There Be a Kantian Consequentialism? Ratio 22 (1):19-40.
- Tim Mulgan (2006). Future People: A Moderate Consequentialist Account of Our Obligations to Future Generations. Oxford University Press.
- Tim Mulgan (2001). The Demands of Consequentialism. Oxford University Press.
- Tim Mulgan (1993). The Unhappy Conclusion and the Life of Virtue. Philosophical Quarterly 44 (172):357-359.
- Alastair Norcross (2006). “The Scalar Approach to Utilitarianism”. In Henry West (ed.), The Blackwell Guide to Mill's Utilitarianism.
- Alastair Norcross (2005). Contextualism for Consequentialists. Acta Analytica 20 (2):80-90.
- Alastair Norcross (1997). Good and Bad Actions. Philosophical Review 106 (1):1-34.
- S. Jack Odell (2001). Practice Consequentialism: A New Twist on an Old Theory. Utilitas 13 (01):86-.
- Jonas Olson & Frans Svensson (2003). A Particular Consequentialism: Why Moral Particularism and Consequentialism Need Not Conflict. Utilitas 15 (2):194-205.
- Toby Ord, How to Be a Consequentialist About Everything.
- Ingmar Persson (1996). Feldman's Justicized Act Utilitarianism. Ratio 9 (1):39-46.
- Martin Peterson (2003). From Consequentialism to Utilitarianism. Journal of Philosophy 100 (8):403-415.
- Martin Peterson (2003). From Consequentialism to Utilitarianism. Journal of Philosophy 100 (8):403-415.
- Philip Pettit & Geoffrey Brennan (1986). Restrictive Consequentialism. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 64 (4):438 – 455.
- Douglas W. Portmore (forthcoming). Consequentialism. In Christian Miller (ed.), The Continuum Companion to Ethical Theory. Continuum.
- Michael Ridge (2009). Consequentialist Kantianism. Philosophical Perspectives 23 (1):421-438.
- M. A. Roberts (2002). A New Way of Doing the Best That We Can: Person‐Based Consequentialism and the Equality Problem. Ethics 112 (2):315-350.
- Melinda A. Roberts (2003). Can It Ever Be Better Never to Have Existed at All? Person-Based Consequentialism and a New Repugnant Conclusion. Journal of Applied Philosophy 20 (2):159–185.
- Re'em Segev (2010). Hierarchical Consequentialism. Utilitas 22 (3):309-330.
- Walter Sinnott-Armstrong (2001). What is Consequentialism? A Reply to Howard-Snyder. Utilitas 13 (03):342-.
- Michael Smith (2001). Immodest Consequentialism and Character. Utilitas 13 (02):173-.
- Bart Streumer (2005). Semi-Global Consequentialism and Blameless Wrongdoing: Reply to Brown. Utilitas 17 (2):226-230.
- Bart Streumer (2003). Can Consequentialism Cover Everything? Utilitas 15 (2):237-47.
- William H. Wilcox (1997). Book Review:Kantian Consequentialism. David Cummiskey. Ethics 108 (1):220-.
|
Off-campus access
Using PhilPapers from home?
Click here to configure this browser for off-campus access.
Monitor this page
Be alerted of all new items appearing on this page. Choose how you want to monitor it:
Email
|
RSS feed
|
|