This category needs an editor. We encourage you to help if you are qualified.
Volunteer, or read more about what this involves.
Related categories
Siblings:
389 found
Search inside:
(import / add options)   Sort by:
1 — 50 / 389
  1. Robert J. Ackermann (1986). Science and Scepticism. Philosophical Books 27 (1):50-54.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  2. Donald C. Ainslie (2010). Adequate Ideas and Modest Scepticism in Hume's Metaphysics of Space. Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 92 (1):39-67.
    In the Treatise of Human Nature , Hume argues that, because we have adequate ideas of the smallest parts of space, we can infer that space itself must conform to our representations of it. The paper examines two challenges to this argument based on Descartes's and Locke's treatments of adequate ideas, ideas that fully capture the objects they represent. The first challenge, posed by Arnauld in his Objections to the Meditations , asks how we can know that an idea is (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  3. Donald C. Ainslie (1999). Scepticism About Persons in Book II of Hume's Treatise. Journal of the History of Philosophy 37 (3):469-492.
  4. Sophie R. Allen (2002). Deepening the Controversy Over Metaphysical Realism. Philosophy 77 (4):519-541.
    A significant ontological commitment is required to sustain metaphysical realism—the view that there is a single, objective way the world is—in order to defend it from common sense objections. This involves presupposing the existence of properties (or tropes, or universals) and relations between them which define the objective structure of the world. This paper explores the grounds for accepting this ontological assumption and examines a sceptical argument which questions whether, having assumed the world is objectively divided into fundamental properties, we (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  5. William P. Alston & Marcus B. Hester (eds.) (1992). Faith, Reason, and Skepticism: Essays. Temple University Press.
    INTRODUCTION William Alston opens this dialogue on faith, reason, and skepticism by arguing that if the belief-forming processes of a typical Christian are ...
    Remove from this list | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  6. Lilian Alweiss (2010). Against Cartesian Mistrust: Cavell, Husserl and the Other Mind Sceptic. Ratio 23 (3):241-259.
    This paper asks whether we should still be haunted by scepticism about other minds. It draws on the writings of Cavell and Husserl to show that there is some truth in the Cartesian premise that has given rise to scepticism about other minds, namely, that our self-awareness is of a fundamentally different type from our awareness of objects and other subjects. While this leads Cavell to argue that there is a truth to scepticism, it proves the opposite to Husserl, viz. (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  7. John Anderson (1935). Scepticism and Construction. [REVIEW] Australasian Journal of Philosophy 13:151.
    Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  8. Robert Arp (1998). Hume's Mitigated Skepticism and the Design Argument. American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 72 (4):539-558.
  9. Robert Audi (2008). Skepticism About A Priori Justification: Self-Evidence, Defeasibility, and Cogito Propositions. In John Greco (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Skepticism. Oxford University Press
    Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  10. Yuval Avnur (2012). Mere Faith and Entitlement. Synthese 189 (2):297-315.
    The scandal to philosophy and human reason, wrote Kant, is that we must take the existence of material objects on mere faith . In contrast, the skeptical paradox that has scandalized recent philosophy is not formulated in terms of faith, but rather in terms of justification, warrant, and entitlement. I argue that most contemporary approaches to the paradox (both dogmatist/liberal and default/conservative) do not address the traditional problem that scandalized Kant, and that the status of having a warrant (or justification) (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  11. Annette C. Baier (2009). Hume's Skeptical Crisis. [REVIEW] Hume Studies 35 (1/2):231-235.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  12. Gary Banham (2010). Scepticism, Causation and Cognition. British Journal for the History of Philosophy 18 (3):507-520.
  13. L. Bargeliotes (1995). Roots, Rising and Versions of Skepticism. Skepsis: A Journal for Philosophy and Interdisciplinary Research 6.
    Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  14. Jonathan Barnes (1990). Some Ways of Scepticism.“. In Stephen Everson (ed.), Epistemology. Cambridge University Press 204--224.
    Remove from this list | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  15. Jonathan Barnes (1988). Scepticism and the Arts. Apeiron 21 (2):53 - 77.
  16. Ron Barnette (2003). Review of" Skeptical Philosophy for Everyone". [REVIEW] Essays in Philosophy 4 (2):16.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  17. Peter Baumann (2013). Knowledge and Dogmatism. Philosophical Quarterly 63 (250):1-19.
    There is a sceptical puzzle according to which knowledge appears to license an unacceptable kind of dogmatism. Here is a version of the corresponding sceptical argument: (1) If a subject S knows a proposition p, then it is OK for S to ignore all evidence against p as misleading; (2) It is never OK for any subject to ignore any evidence against their beliefs as misleading; (3) Hence, nobody knows anything.I distinguish between different versions of the puzzle (mainly a ‘permissibility’ (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  18. Donald L. M. Baxter (2009). Hume's Theory of Space and Time in its Sceptical Context. In David Fate Norton & Jacqueline Anne Taylor (eds.), The Cambridge Companion to Hume. Cambridge University Press
  19. Gordon C. F. Bearn (1987). Reply to Martin's “A Critique of Nietzsche's Metaphysical Scepticism”. International Studies in Philosophy 19 (2):61-65.
  20. John Beaudoin (2000). Inscrutable Evil and Scepticism. Heythrop Journal 41 (3):297–302.
    Philosophical theologians have in recent years revived and cast in sophisticated form a non‐theodical approach to defeating probabilistic arguments from evil. In this article I consider and reject the claim that their emphasis on the epistemic gap separating us from God entails a radical form of scepticism. I then argue, however, that proponents of this view cannot escape and unattractive theological scepticism.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  21. James Beebe (2010). Constraints on Sceptical Hypotheses. Philosophical Quarterly 60 (240):449 - 470.
    I examine the conditions which hypotheses must satisfy if they are to be used to raise significant sceptical challenges. I argue that sceptical hypotheses do not have to be logically, metaphysically or epistemically possible: they need only to depict scenarios subjectively indistinguishable from the actual world and to show how subjects can believe what they do while not having knowledge. I also argue that sceptical challenges can be raised against a priori beliefs, even if those beliefs are necessarily true. I (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download (8 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  22. John W. Bender (2003). Skepticism, Justification and the Trustworthiness Argument. In Olsson Erik (ed.), The Epistemology of Keith Lehrer. Kluwer 263--280.
    Remove from this list | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  23. Niels Ole Bernsen (1978). Knowledge: A Treatise on Our Cognitive Situation. Odense University Press.
  24. Richard Bett (2000). Nietzsche on the Skeptics and Nietzsche as Skeptic. Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 82 (1):62-86.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  25. Bhaswati Bhattacharya (1987). Absolute Skepticism, Eastern and Western. Prajñā.
    Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  26. Shlomo Biderman (1981). The Sceptic's Dillema: An Indian Version. [REVIEW] Journal of Indian Philosophy 9 (1):39-48.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  27. John Bigelow (1994). Skeptical Realism. The Monist 77 (1):3-26.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  28. Andrzej Biłat (2012). Dubito Ergo Non Sum or the Logic of Skepticism. Polish Journal of Philosophy 6 (2):7-14.
    The paper analyses three versions of skepticism: the attitude of a general withholding of belief; the attitude of general doubt and the view that all beliefs are unjustified. It is shown on the basis of epistemic logic that only the first of these versions can be deemed not to be self-contradictory.
    Remove from this list | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  29. Tim Black (2008). Solving the Problem of Easy Knowledge. Philosophical Quarterly 58 (233):597-617.
    Stewart Cohen argues that several epistemological theories fall victim to the problem of easy knowledge: they allow us to know far too easily that certain sceptical hypotheses are false and that how things seem is a reliable indicator of how they are. This problem is a result of the theories' interaction with an epistemic closure principle. Cohen suggests that the theories should be modified. I argue that attempts to solve the problem should focus on closure instead; a new and plausible (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  30. M. Bonazzi (2003). Rec.: J. Sihvola (Ed.), Ancient Scepticism and the Sceptical Tradition (Helsinki 2000). Rivista di Storia Della Filosofia 58:161-164.
    Remove from this list | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  31. David Frederick Bowers (1941). Atomism, Empiricism, and Scepticism. Princeton.
    Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  32. Jason Bridges, Niko Kolodny & Wai-Hung Wong (eds.) (2012). The Possibility of Philosophical Understanding: Reflections on the Thought of Barry Stroud. OUP Usa.
    Barry Stroud's work has had a profound impact on a very wide array of philosophical topics, but there has heretofore been no book-length treatment of his work. The current collection aims to redress this gap, with 13 essays on Stroud's work, all but one new to this volume.
    Remove from this list | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  33. Justin Broackes (1995). Common Sense, Science and Scepticism. [REVIEW] Hume Studies 21 (1):138-139.
  34. Anthony Brueckner (2010). Essays on Skepticism. Oxford University Press.
    The guiding questions of this volume are: Can we have knowledge of the external world of things outside our minds?
    Remove from this list | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  35. Anthony Brueckner (2008). Review of Michael N. Forster, Kant and Skepticism. [REVIEW] Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews 2008 (7).
  36. Anthony Brueckner (2007). Scepticism About Self-Knowledge Redux. Analysis 67 (296):311–315.
  37. Anthony Brueckner (2005). Knowledge, Evidence, and Skepticism According to Williamson. [REVIEW] Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 70 (2):436–443.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (8 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  38. Anthony Brueckner (1999). Difficulties in Generating Scepticism About Knowledge of Content. Analysis 59 (1):59–62.
  39. Anthony Brueckner (1991). The Anti-Skeptical Epistemology of the Refutation of Idealism. Philosophical Topics 19 (1):31-45.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  40. Anthony Brueckner (1984). Epistemic Universalizability Principles. Philosophical Studies 46 (3):297-305.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  41. Anthony L. Brueckner (2003). The Coherence of Scepticism About Self-Knowledge. Analysis 63 (1):41-48.
  42. Anthony L. Brueckner (1997). Is Scepticism About Self-Knowledge Incoherent? Analysis 57 (4):287-90.
    Gary Ebbs has argued that skepticism regarding knowledge of the contents of one's own mental states cannot even be coherently formulated. This articles is a reply to that argument.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (11 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  43. Anthony L. Brueckner (1986). Humean Fictions. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 46 (4):655-664.
    In "Of Personal Identity,", Hume attempts to explain how one arrives at the fiction of a substantial self which retains its numerical identity through time. In "Of Scepticism with Regard to the Senses," Hume offers a similar explanation of the origin of another fiction - that of objects which enjoy a continued and distinct existence. In this paper, I will argue that his pair of parallel explanations does not jointly account for the pair of fictions to be explained.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  44. Gerd Buchdahl (1959). Sources of Scepticism in Atomic Theory. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 10 (38):120-134.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (8 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  45. Otavio Bueno (2008). Relativism and Scepticism. International Journal of Philosophical Studies 16 (2):247 – 254.
  46. Otávio Bueno (2008). Relativism and Scepticism. International Journal of Philosophical Studies 16 (2):247-254.
  47. Jesse Butler (2008). Russell T. Hurlburt and Eric Schwitzgebel, Describing Inner Experience? Proponent Meets Skeptic. [REVIEW] Philosophy in Review 28:269-271.
    Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  48. A. C. (1982). The Sceptical Feminist. Review of Metaphysics 36 (1):184-186.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  49. Charles A. Campbell (1932). Scepticism and Construction: Bradley's Sceptical Principle as the Basis of Constructive Philosophy. Journal of Philosophy 29 (23):637-639.
    Remove from this list | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  50. Joseph Campbell (2010). Knowledge and Skepticism. MIT Press.
    Remove from this list |
    Translate to English
    |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
1 — 50 / 389