This category needs an editor. We encourage you to help if you are qualified.
Volunteer, or read more about what this involves.
Related categories
Siblings:
69 found
Search inside:
(import / add options)   Sort by:
1 — 50 / 69
  1. Rubin P. Alfred (1998). Međunarodni Kazneni Tribunal Za Bivšu Jugoslaviju? Theoria 41 (1):81-89.
    Remove from this list | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  2. Andrew Altman (2012). Genocide and Crimes Against Humanity: Dispelling the Conceptual Fog. Social Philosophy and Policy 29 (1):280-308.
    Genocide and crimes against humanity are among the core crimes of international law, but they also carry great moral resonance due to their indissoluble link to the atrocities of the Nazi regime and to other egregious episodes of mass violence. However, the concepts of genocide and crimes against humanity are not well understood, even by the international lawyers and jurists who are most concerned with them. A conceptual fog hovers around the discussion of these two categories of crime. In this (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  3. Alexander Barder (2008). Larry May, War Crimes and Just War. [REVIEW] Philosophy in Review 28:210-211.
    Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  4. Endre Begby (2012). Collective Responsibility for Unjust Wars. POLITICS 32 (2):100-108.
    This article argues against Anna Stilz's recent attempt to solve the problem of citizens' collective responsibility in democratic states. I show that her solution could only apply to state actions that are (in legal terminology) unjustified but excusable. Stilz's marquee case – the 2003 invasion of Iraq – does not, I will argue, fit this bill; nor, in all likelihood, does any other case in recorded history. Thus, this article concludes, we may allow that Stilz's argument offers a theoretically cogent (...)
    Remove from this list |
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  5. Claudia Card (2010). Confronting Evils: Terrorism, Torture, Genocide. Cambridge University Press.
    Machine generated contents note: Part I. The Concept of Evil: 1. Inexcusable wrongs; 2. Between good and evil; 3. Complicity in structural evils; 4. To whom (or to what?) can evils be done?; Part II. Terrorism, Torture, Genocide: 5. Counterterrorism; 6. Low-profile terrorism; 7. Conscientious torture?; 8. Ordinary torture; 9. Genocide is social death; 10. Genocide by forced impregnation; Bibliography; Filmography; Websites; Index.
    Remove from this list | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  6. Claudia Card (2002). The Atrocity Paradigm: A Theory of Evil. Oxford University Press.
    What distinguishes evils from ordinary wrongs? Is hatred a necessarily evil? Are some evils unforgivable? Are there evils we should tolerate? What can make evils hard to recognize? Are evils inevitable? How can we best respond to and live with evils? Claudia Card offers a secular theory of evil that responds to these questions and more. Evils, according to her theory, have two fundamental components. One component is reasonably foreseeable intolerable harm -- harm that makes a life indecent and impossible (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  7. Yvonne Chiu (2011). Liberal Lustration. Journal of Political Philosophy 19 (4):440-464.
    After a regime-changing war, a state often engages in lustration—condemnation and punishment of dangerous, corrupt, or culpable remnants of the previous system—e.g., de-Nazification or the more recent de-Ba’athification in Iraq. This common practice poses an important moral dilemma for liberals because even thoughtful and nuanced lustration involves condemning groups of people, instead of treating each case individually. It also raises important questions about collective agency, group treatment, and rectifying historical injustices. Liberals often oppose lustration because it denies moral individualism and (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  8. Yvonne Chiu (2010). Uniform Exceptions and Rights Violations. Social Theory and Practice 36 (1):44-77.
    Non-uniformed combat morally infringes on civilians’ fundamental right to immunity and exacts an impermissible form of unofficial conscription that is morally prohibited even if the civilians knowingly consent to it. It is often argued that revolutionary groups burdened by resource disparities relative to the state or who claim alternative sources of political legitimacy (such as national self-determination or the constitution of a political collective) are justified in using unconventional tactics such as non-uniformed combat. Neither those reasons nor the provision of (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  9. Noam Chomsky, War Crimes and Imperial Fantasies.
    I want to ask you about a painting that hangs in your office. It’s rather gruesome. You’ve commented to me that mostly U.S. citizens don’t seem to know who it is, but most foreigners that come to visit you and see it recognize it immediately.
    Remove from this list |
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  10. Noam Chomsky, Green Light for War Crimes.
    "The evidence for a direct link between the militia and the military is beyond any dispute and has been overwhelmingly documented by UNAMET over the last four months. But the scale and thoroughness of the destruction of East Timor in the past week has demonstrated a new level of open participation of the military in the implementation of what was previously a more veiled operation.".
    Remove from this list |
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  11. Ian Clark (1988). Waging War: A Philosophical Introduction. Oxford University Press.
    What is war, and how should it be waged? Are there restraints on its conduct? What can philosophers contribute to the study of warfare? Arguing that the practice of war requires a sound philosophical understanding, Ian Clark writes a fascinating synthesis of the philosophy, history, political theory, and contemporary strategy of warfare. Examining the traditional doctrines of the "just" and the "limited" war with fresh insight, Clark also addresses the applicability of these ideas to the modern issues of war crimes, (...)
    Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  12. Michael Clark & Peter Cave (2010). Nowhere to Run? Punishing War Crimes. Res Publica 16 (2):197-207.
    This paper’s aim is to provide overview of the punishment of war crimes. It considers first the rationale of the law of war, the identification and scope of war crimes, and proceeds to consider the justification of punishing war crimes, arguing for a consequentialist view with side-constraints. It then considers the alternative of reconciliation.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  13. Christopher Collstedt, The Descents of Military Violence Against Civilians: A History of the Present.
    Inspired by the works of Michel Foucault and Erling Sandmo, this article explores contemporary discourses of military violence against civilians from a genealogical perspective. The purpose is to shed light on the historicity of certain structures of knowledge, thoughts, politics and ethics that are fundamental for the ways in which military violence against civilians is put into words, interpreted and explained in various situations and contexts today. My main argument is that the descents of Swedish contemporary discourse on military violence (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  14. J. Angelo Corlett (2010). Us Responsibility for War Crimes in Iraq. Res Publica 16 (2):227-244.
    This paper examines the recent actions by the United States in Iraq in the light of just war principles, and sets forth a program for holding accountable those most responsible for war crimes in Iraq.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  15. War Crimes & Just War (2007). Best in Scholarship. Philosophy and Public Affairs 942:660.
  16. Jovana Davidovic (2013). International Criminal Court, the Trust Fund for Victims and Victim Participation. In Larry May Elizabeth Edenberg (ed.), Jus Post Bellum and Transitional Justice. Cambridge University Press 217-243.
    Remove from this list | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  17. Jovana Davidovic (2012). Transitional Justice and Jus Post Bellum Issues in Timor-Leste. In Larry May Andrew Forcehimes (ed.), Morality, Just Post Bellum and International Law. Cambridge University Press
    Remove from this list | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  18. Dan Demetriou (2013). Honor War Theory: Romance or Reality? Philosophical Papers 42 (3):285 - 313.
    Just War Theory (JWT) replaced an older "warrior code," an approach to war that remains poorly understood and dismissively treated in the philosophical literature. This paper builds on recent work on honor to address these deficiencies. By providing a clear, systematic exposition of "Honor War Theory" (HWT), we can make sense of paradigm instances of warrior psychology and behavior, and understand the warrior code as the martial expression of a broader honor-based ethos that conceives of obligation in terms of fair (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  19. Michael Dillon (2008). Security, Race and War. In Michael Dillon & Andrew W. Neal (eds.), Foucault on Politics, Security and War. Palgrave Macmillan
  20. Anthony Ellis (2010). War Crimes, Punishment and the Burden of Proof. Res Publica 16 (2):181-196.
    This paper argues that there is a default presumption that punishment has some deterrent effect, and that the burden of proof is upon those who allege that the costs of any particular penal system are insufficient to offset its deterrent benefits. This burden of proof transmits to the discussion of international law, with the conclusion that it is those who oppose international jurisdiction, rather than their opponents, who must prove their position. This they have so far failed to do.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  21. Aaron Fichtelberg (2005). Crimes Beyond Justice? Retributivism and War Crimes. Criminal Justice Ethics 24 (1):31-46.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  22. Robert Fine (2007). Cosmopolitanism. New York.
    Preface : twenty theses on cosmopolitan social theory -- Taking the "ism" out of cosmopolitanism : the equivocations of the new cosmopolitanism -- Confronting reputations : Kant's cosmopolitanism and Hegel's critique -- Cosmopolitanism and political community : the equivocations of constitutional patriotism -- Cosmopolitanism and international law : from the law of peoples to the constitutionalisation of international law -- Cosmopolitanism and humanitarian military intervention : war, peace and human rights -- Cosmopolitanism and punishment : prosecuting crimes against humanity -- (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  23. Paul Gilbert (2010). Civilian Immunity in the 'New Wars'. In Igor Primoratz (ed.), Civilian Immunity in War. OUP Oxford
  24. R. M. Hare (1972). Rules of War and Moral Reasoning. Philosophy and Public Affairs 1 (2):166-181.
  25. Ranjoo Seodu Herr (2013). ‘Comfort Women’ and Japan’s National Responsibility. In Jun-Hyeok Kwak & Melissa Nobles (eds.), Historical Reconciliation and Inherited Responsibility. Routledge 1--145.
  26. Jeremy Horder (1996). Crimes of Ulterior Intent. In A. P. Simester & A. T. H. Smith (eds.), Harm and Culpability. Oxford University Press 153--68.
    Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  27. Cheryl Hughes (2007). Defining and Prosecuting International Crimes: Commentary for Larry May, Crimes Against Humanity: A Normative Account. Social Philosophy Today 23:231-235.
    Remove from this list | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  28. Aleksandar Jokic (2012). What's A Just War Theorist? Journal of Theoretical and Philosophical Criminology 4 (2):91-114.
    The article provides an account of the unlikely revival of the medieval Just War Theory, due in large part to the efforts of Michael Walzer. Its purpose is to address the question: What is a just war theorist? By exploring contrasts between scholarly activity and forms of international activism, the paper argues that just war theorists appear to be just war criminals, both on the count of aiding and abetting aggression and on the count of inciting troops to commit war (...)
    Remove from this list |
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  29. Leonard Kahn (2010). Just War Theory, Political Liberalism, and Non-Combatant Immunity. Theoretical and Applied Ethics.
    The is a brief response to Matthew Bruenig's "Rethinking Noncombatant Immunity." I argue, contra Bruenig, that political liberalism does not raise any special problems for the view that non-combatants should not be directly targeted by another country's military.
    Remove from this list |
    Translate to English
    |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  30. Shawn Kaplan (2009). Three Prejudices Against Terrorism. Critical Studies on Terrorism 2 (2):181-199.
    This paper criticizes three assumptions regarding terrorism and the agents who carry it out: 1) terrorists are always indiscriminate in their targeting, 2) terrorism is never effective in combating oppression, and 3) terrorists never participate in fair negotiations as they merely wish to switch places with their oppressors. By criticizing these three prejudices against terrorism, the paper does not attempt to justify or excuse terrorism generally nor in the specific case of Sri Lanka which is examined. Instead, it creates the (...)
    Remove from this list |
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  31. Philipp von dem Knesebeck (2014). Soldaten, Guerilleros, Terroristen. Springer VS.
    Seit dem Ende des Ost-West-Konflikts sind „neue“ oder „asymmetrische“ Kriege, die in zerfallenen Staaten, gegen Milizen, Warlords oder Terroristen geführt werden, zur Regel geworden. Die auf das Staatensystem des Westfälischen Friedens zugeschnittene Lehre des gerechten Krieges, nach der in der Philosophie und im Völkerrecht kriegerische Handlungen traditionell bewertet werden, wird so auf die Probe gestellt. Philipp von dem Knesebeck identifiziert diejenigen Aspekte asymmetrischer Konflikte, die Herausforderungen für die Lehre des gerechten Krieges darstellen und zeigt anhand von Beispielen Ansätze für ihre (...)
    Remove from this list |
    Translate to English
    | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  32. Seth Lazar (2012). Scepticism About Jus Post Bellum. In Larry May & Andrew Forcehimes (eds.), Morality, Jus Post Bellum, and International Law. Cambridge University Press
    The burgeoning literature on jus post bellum has repeatedly reaffirmed three positions that strike me as deeply implausible: that in the aftermath of wars, compensation should be a priority; that we should likewise prioritize punishing political leaders and war criminals even in the absence of legitimate multilateral institutions; and that when states justifiably launch armed humanitarian interventions, they become responsible for reconstructing the states into which they have intervened – the so called “Pottery Barn” dictum, “You break it, you own (...)
    Remove from this list |
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  33. Seth Lazar (2012). The Morality and Law of War. In Andrei Marmor (ed.), Routledge Companion to the Philosophy of Law. Routledge 364.
    The revisionist critique of conventional just war theory has undoubtedly scored some important victories. Walzer’s elegantly unified defense of combatant legal equality and noncombatant immunity has been seriously undermined. This critical success has not, however, been matched by positive arguments, which when applied to the messy reality of war would deprive states and soldiers of the permission to fight wars that are plausibly thought to be justified. The appeal to law that is sought to resolve this objection by casting it (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  34. Michele Le Doeuff (2005). Crimes Unpunished: Crimes as Punishment. In Nicholas Bamforth (ed.), Sex Rights: The Oxford Amnesty Lectures 2002. OUP Oxford
    Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  35. Chiara Lepora & Robert E. Goodin (2011). Grading Complicity in Rwandan Refugee Camps. Journal of Applied Philosophy 28 (3):259-276.
    Complicity with wrongdoing comes in many forms and many degrees. We distinguish subcategories cooperation, collaboration and collusion from connivance and condoning, identifying their defining features and assessing their characteristic moral valences. We illustrate the use of these distinctions by reference to events in refugee camps in and around Rwanda after the 1994 genocide, and the extent to which international organizations and nongovernment organizations were wrongfully complicit with the misuse of refugees as human shields by the perpetrators of the genocide who (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  36. D. Luban (2002). War Crimes and Collective Wrongdoing: A Reader. Philosophical Review 111 (4):620-624.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  37. David Luban (2008). War Crimes : The Law of Hell. In Larry May & Emily Crookston (eds.), War: Essays in Political Philosophy. Cambridge University Press
    Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  38. David Luban (2002). War Crimes and Collective Wrongdoing. Philosophical Review 111 (4):620-624.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  39. Alice MacLachlan (2012). The Values of Political Reconciliation. [REVIEW] Transnational Legal Theory 3 (1):95-100.
  40. Lawrence Masek (2002). All's Not Fair in War: How Kant's Just War Theory Refutes War Realism. Public Affairs Quarterly 16 (2):143-154.
  41. Larry May (2007). War Crimes and Just War. Cambridge University Press.
    Larry May argues that the best way to understand war crimes is as crimes against humanness rather than as violations of justice.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  42. Larry May (2006). Prosecuting Military Leaders for War Crimes. Metaphilosophy 37 (3-4):469–488.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  43. Rafe McGregor (2014). Discourse and Defiance Under Nazi Occupation: Guernsey, Channel Islands, 1940–1945 by Cheryl R. Jorgensen‐Earp, 2013 East Lansing, MI, Michigan State University Pressx + 300 Pp., £47.50 (Hb). [REVIEW] Journal of Applied Philosophy 31 (3):322-324.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  44. Richard W. Miller (2001). Nationalist Morality and Crimes Against Humanity. In Aleksander Jokić (ed.), War Crimes and Collective Wrongdoing: A Reader. Blackwell
    Remove from this list |
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  45. Nicholas Morris (2003). Humanitarian Intervention in the Balkans. In Jennifer M. Welsh (ed.), Humanitarian Intervention and International Relations. OUP Oxford
  46. Sheila Murnaghan (1999). Staging Ancient Crimes: A Response to Aristodemou, Tiefenbrun, Purkiss, and Pantazakos. Cardozo Studies in Law and Literature 11 (1):77-89.
    Remove from this list | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  47. Colleen Murphy & Linda Radzik (2013). Jus Post Bellum and Political Reconciliation. In Larry May & Elizabeth Edenberg (eds.), Jus Post Bellum and Transitional Justice. Cambridge
  48. Thomas Nagel (1972). War and Massacre. Philosophy and Public Affairs 1 (2):123-144.
    From the apathetic reaction to atrocities committed in Vietnam by the United States and its allies, one may conclude that moral restrictions on the conduct of war command almost as little sympathy among the general public as they do among those charged with the formation of U.S. military policy. Even when restrictions on the conduct of warfare are defended, it is usually on legal grounds alone: their moral basis is often poorly understood. I wish to argue that certain restrictions are (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  49. Stephen Nathanson (2010). Terrorism and the Ethics of War. Cambridge University Press.
    Stephen Nathanson argues that we cannot have morally credible views about terrorism if we focus on terrorism alone and neglect broader issues about the ethics ...
    Remove from this list | Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  50. Peter Olsthoorn (2013). Virtue Ethics in the Military. In Stan van Hooft (ed.), The Handbook of Virtue Ethics. Acumen 365-374.
1 — 50 / 69