Switch to: References

Citations of:

Foucault's new functionalism

Theory and Society 23 (5):679-709 (1994)

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. Two basic analyses of the historiography of semiotics: M. Foucault’s comparative semiology and J.N. Deely’s semiotic realism. [REVIEW]Martin Švantner - 2020 - Semiotica 2020 (233):159-177.
    In this study I compare the work of two scholars who are important for contemporary research into the history of semiotics. The main goal of the study is to describe specific rhetorical/figurative forms and structures of persuasion between two epistemological positions that determine various possibilities in the historiography of semiotics. The main question is this: how do we understand two important metatheoretical forms of descriptions in the historiography of semiotics or the history of sign relations? The first perspective is semiology (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  • Choosing health: embodied neoliberalism, postfeminism, and the “do-diet”.Josée Johnston & Kate Cairns - 2015 - Theory and Society 44 (2):153-175.
    Feminist scholars have long demonstrated how women are constrained through dieting discourse. Today’s scholars wrestle with similar themes, but confront a thornier question: how do we make sense of a food discourse that frames food choices through a lens of empowerment and health, rather than vanity and restriction? This article addresses this question, drawing from interviews and focus groups with women (N = 100), as well as health-focused food writing. These data allow us to document a postfeminist food discourse that (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • Integrating Archer and Foucault.Nick Hardy - 2019 - Journal of Critical Realism 18 (1):1-17.
    ABSTRACTThis paper compares Margaret Archer’s morphogenetic critical realism and Michel Foucault’s implicit discursive realism. It argues that there is a surprisingly high degree of correspondence between the two social ontologies. Specifically, both ontologies suggest that there are three largely autonomous domains in operation: cultural, structural, and agentive. Yet, while each of these domains have a level of independence, yet they are also partially constituted by the content and form of the others. This paper discusses the potential to integrate the two (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   5 citations