Switch to: References

Citations of:

The failure of classical theistic arguments

In Michael Martin (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Atheism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. pp. 86--101 (2007)

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. Disembodied Communication and Religious Experience: The Online Model.David S. Oderberg - 2012 - Philosophy and Technology 25 (3):381-397.
    Abstract The idea of disembodied communication has received widespread discussion in the context of the various kinds of online interaction. Electronic mail is probably the purest form of text-based communication where interlocutors are present in mind rather than body. I argue that this online model provides a way of understanding and defending the possibility of a certain kind of public religious experience, contra the many critics of the very coherence of genuine religious experience. I introduce the concept of ‘telic possibility’, (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Atheism.C. M. Lorkowski - 2013 - Philosophy Compass 8 (5):523-538.
    Philosophical atheism claims not only that there are no sufficient reasons for believing there is a God, but also that there are sufficient reasons for thinking no such deity exists. The purpose of this article is to explicate the typical commitments of this position. After distinguished several related views, the article will then consider typical grounds for the rejection of theistic commitments, first by showing that the theistic position makes a stronger claim and therefore carries the burden of proof. The (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • On misrepresenting the thomistic five ways.Joseph A. Buijs - 2009 - Sophia 48 (1):15 - 34.
    A number of recent discussions of atheism allude to cosmological arguments in support of theism. The five ways of Aquinas are classic instances, offered as rational justification for theistic belief. However, the five ways receive short shrift. They are curtly dismissed as vacuous, arbitrary, and even insulting to reason. I contend that the atheistic critique of the Thomistic five ways, and similarly formulated cosmological arguments, argues at cross purposes because it misrepresents them. I first lay out the context, intent and (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation