Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. On travelling backward in time.Robert Weingard - 1972 - Synthese 24 (1-2):117 - 132.
    We must conclude, from the above discussion, that Putnam has not satisfactorily explained how a person can go back in time and thus has not offered any compelling reason why we should accept his description of Oscar rather than his objector's description. However, earlier in our discussion, a possible way to show that Oscar did go back in time came to light: namely, if it could be shown that Oscar2 was at B at t 1 because Oscar1 entered the time (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   4 citations  
  • Experimental tests of isometry hypotheses.Roberto de A. Martins - 1982 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 33 (3):296-304.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  • On going backward in time.John Earman - 1967 - Philosophy of Science 34 (3):211-222.
    This paper presents a critical examination of claims advanced by several philosophers to the effect that 'time travel' represents a physical possibility and that the interpretation of certain actually observed phenomena in terms of 'time travel' is both legitimate and advantageous. It is argued that (a) no convincing motivation for the introduction of the time travel hypothesis has been presented; (b) no coherent and interesting sense of 'going backward in time' has been supplied which makes 'time travel' compatible with Special (...)
    Direct download (10 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   7 citations