Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. Advantageous Interventions: Will Someone Be Healed?Noam Zohar - 2012 - American Journal of Bioethics 12 (8):32 - 33.
    The American Journal of Bioethics, Volume 12, Issue 8, Page 32-33, August 2012.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Selecting for Disability: Acceptable Lives, Acceptable Reasons.David Wasserman & Adrienne Asch - 2012 - American Journal of Bioethics 12 (8):30 - 31.
    The American Journal of Bioethics, Volume 12, Issue 8, Page 30-31, August 2012.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  • Bioethics: why philosophy is essential for progress.Julian Savulescu - 2015 - Journal of Medical Ethics 41 (1):28-33.
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   29 citations  
  • Does the Non-Identity Problem Imply a Double Standard for Physicians and Patients?Melinda A. Roberts - 2012 - American Journal of Bioethics 12 (8):38 - 39.
    The American Journal of Bioethics, Volume 12, Issue 8, Page 38-39, August 2012.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Impersonalism in Bioethics.Robert Ranisch - 2012 - American Journal of Bioethics 12 (8):40 - 41.
    The American Journal of Bioethics, Volume 12, Issue 8, Page 40-41, August 2012.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • The Right Not to Know and the Duty to Tell: The Case of Relatives.Niklas Juth - 2014 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 42 (1):38-52.
    This text is about obtaining and sharing genetic information when there is a potential conflict of interests between patients and their families and relatives. The patient or, in this text, the “index-person,” is someone who is considering obtaining or already has obtained genetic information about herself through genetic testing.The index-person can have several reasons to take an interest in obtaining her genetic information. She may want to know if she has a genetic predisposition for a disorder in order to take (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  • The Right Not to Know and the Duty to Tell: The Case of Relatives.Niklas Juth - 2014 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 42 (1):38-52.
    Obtaining and sharing genetic information when there is a potential conflict of interest between patients and their relatives give rise to two questions. Do we have a duty to find out our genetic predispositions for disease for the sake of our relatives, or do we have a right to remain ignorant? Do we have a duty to disclose our known genetic predispositions for disease to our relatives? I argue that the answer to both questions is yes, but to a lesser (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  • The Right Not to Be Born: Reinterpreting the Nonidentity Problem.Nancy S. Jecker - 2012 - American Journal of Bioethics 12 (8):34 - 35.
    The American Journal of Bioethics, Volume 12, Issue 8, Page 34-35, August 2012.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Response to: ‘Questioning the significance of the non-identity problem in applied ethics’ by Lawlor.Tony Hope - 2015 - Journal of Medical Ethics 41 (11):897-898.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • A Sufficient Limit to “Reasonable” Choices.Matthew DeCamp - 2012 - American Journal of Bioethics 12 (8):36 - 38.
    The American Journal of Bioethics, Volume 12, Issue 8, Page 36-38, August 2012.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Harming as causing harm.Elizabeth Harman - 2009 - In M. A. Roberts & D. T. Wasserman (eds.), Harming Future Persons. Springer Verlag. pp. 137--154.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   64 citations