Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. Books Received. [REVIEW][author unknown] - 1999 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 42 (3):505-508.
    . Books Received. Inquiry: Vol. 42, No. 3-4, pp. 505-508.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Review essay: Mr. Smith does not go to Washington.Bart Schultz - 2007 - Philosophy of the Social Sciences 37 (3):366-386.
    A recent spate of books on the life and legacy of the political philosopher Leo Strauss, notably Steven B. Smith's Reading Leo Strauss: Politics, Philosophy, and Judaism , suggests a desperate effort to salvage Strauss and the Straussian school of political philosophy from the wreckage of American neoconservatism. Although a number of these works are quite thoughtful and helpfully counter many of the more extreme (and uglier) charges made concerning the meaning of Straussianism and its political influence, their general drift (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  • Popper's social‐democratic politics and free‐market liberalism.Fred Eidlin - 2005 - Critical Review: A Journal of Politics and Society 17 (1-2):25-48.
    Holding unlimited economic freedom to be nearly as dangerous as physical violence, Karl Popper advocated “piecemeanl” economic intervention by the state. Jeremy Shearmur's recent book on Popper contends that as the philosopher aged, his views grew closer to classical liberalism than those expressed in The Open Society—consistently with what Shearmur sees as the logic of Popper's arguments. But Popper's philosophy, while recognizing that any project aimed at bringing about social change must be immensely complex and fraught with difficulty, retains grounds (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   5 citations  
  • Karl Popper, Science and Enlightenment.Nicholas Maxwell - 2017 - London: UCL Press.
    Karl Popper is famous for having proposed that science advances by a process of conjecture and refutation. He is also famous for defending the open society against what he saw as its arch enemies – Plato and Marx. Popper’s contributions to thought are of profound importance, but they are not the last word on the subject. They need to be improved. My concern in this book is to spell out what is of greatest importance in Popper’s work, what its failings (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   5 citations