Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. The Theory of Legal Dynamics Reconsidered.Ota Weinberger - 1991 - Ratio Juris 4 (1):18-35.
    The author criticizes Kelsen's distinction between static and dynamic systems of norms and his theory of legal dynamics. The author moreover presents the institutionalist conception of legal dynamics. Kelsen's concept of static systems is incompatible with normological scepticism: The deduction of rules from a basic principle depends on additional premises; even in static systems there is a kind of dynamics produced by actual facts. Kelsen's conception of legal dynamics is also incompatible with normological scepticism and with Kelsen's demand of purity (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  • Towards a New Analytical Framework for Legal Communication.Hanneke van Schooten - 2014 - International Journal for the Semiotics of Law - Revue Internationale de Sémiotique Juridique 27 (3):425-461.
    This article develops a model first proposed in my book Jurisprudence and communication [67]. It takes as its starting point the generally conception that legal rules are valid norms, involving a normative content and expressing themselves in reality through observable conduct. This dualistic character of law is central. Law is both fiction and factual, ideal and real. But the viewpoint that a legal rule is a manifestation of validity in reality, through empirical acts, raises the question how rules as (valid) (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Neil MacCormick's Second Thoughts on Legal Reasoning and Legal Theory. A Defence of the Original View.Aldo Schiavello - 2011 - Ratio Juris 24 (2):140-155.
    This paper offers a diachronic reconstruction of MacCormick's theory of law and legal argumentation: In particular, two related points will be highlighted in which the difference between the perspective upheld in Legal Reasoning and Legal Theory and the later writings is particularly marked. The first point concerns MacCormick's gradual break with legal positivism, and more specifically the thesis that the implicit pretension to justice of law proves legal positivism false in all its different versions. The second point concerns MacCormick's acceptance (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Positive Law and Systemic Legitimacy: A Comment on Hart and Habermas.Eric W. Orts - 1993 - Ratio Juris 6 (3):245-278.
    The author revisits H. L. A. Hart's theory of positive law and argues for a major qualification to the thesis of the separation of law and morality based on a concept of systemic legitimacy derived from the social theory of Jurgen Habermas. He argues that standards for assessing the degree of systemic legitimacy in modern legal systems can develop through reflective exercise of “critical legality,” a concept coined to parallel Hart's “critical morality,” and an expanded understanding of the “external” and (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • Neminem laedere. An evolutionary agent-based model of the interplay between punishment and damaging behaviours.Nicola Lettieri & Domenico Parisi - 2013 - Artificial Intelligence and Law 21 (4):425-453.
    This article aims at contributing to the discussion about the relationships between ICT, computer science and policy-making by focusing on agent-based social simulation. Enabled, from a technical point of view, by the developments of Distributed Artificial Intelligence in the 1990s and by the features of the object-oriented programming paradigm, agent-based social simulations are a tool for the analysis of social dynamics that can be used also to support the design and the evaluation of public policies. After a brief description of (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • The Concept of Law and Its Conceptions.Peter Koller - 2006 - Ratio Juris 19 (2):180-196.
    In this paper, I make an attempt to look for a thin and general concept of law that, as far as possible, should be neutral to the more substantial views of legal moralism and legal positivism, so that it is acceptable from both points of view. With this aim in view, I shall begin with a few remarks on concept formation and name a list of necessary requirements on an appropriate concept of law. On this basis, I intend to discuss (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   5 citations  
  • On the Nature of Norms.Peter Koller - 2014 - Ratio Juris 27 (2):155-175.
    This paper deals with the question of how norms are to be conceived of in order to understand their role as guidelines for human action within various normative orders, particularly in the context of law on the one hand and conventional morality on the other. After some brief remarks on the history of the term “norm,” the author outlines the most significant general features of actually existing social norms, including legal and conventional norms, from which he arrives at two basic (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  • Normative autonomy and normative co-ordination: Declarative power, representation, and mandate. [REVIEW]Jonathan Gelati, Antonino Rotolo, Giovanni Sartor & Guido Governatori - 2004 - Artificial Intelligence and Law 12 (1-2):53-81.
    In this paper we provide a formal analysis of the idea of normative co-ordination. We argue that this idea is based on the assumption that agents can achieve flexible co-ordination by conferring normative positions to other agents. These positions include duties, permissions, and powers. In particular, we explain the idea of declarative power, which consists in the capacity of the power-holder of creating normative positions, involving other agents, simply by proclaiming such positions. In addition, we account also for the concepts (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   9 citations  
  • What is the Reason for This Rule? An Inferential Account of the Ratio Legis.Damiano Canale & Giovanni Tuzet - 2010 - Argumentation 24 (2):197-210.
    Several legal arguments use the notion of ratio legis in order to sustain a normative conclusion, in particular the argument from analogy and some forms of teleological argumentation. However, determining the ratio is often a difficult and controversial task. In this paper we look firstly at the speech acts typically performed by legal practitioners in order to determine the ratio and, secondly, we take into account the argumentative commitments they undertake in so doing and the argumentative constraints put on them. (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   5 citations  
  • Le Raisonnement Juridique: Une Pratique Spécifique? [REVIEW]Pierre Brunet - 2013 - International Journal for the Semiotics of Law - Revue Internationale de Sémiotique Juridique 26 (4):767-782.
    Selon une thèse largement partagée, le droit et une pratique sociale et les contributions des participants sont complémentaires les unes des autres. Dans ces conditions, le raisonnement juridique consiste d’abord en une interprétation de ces pratiques et présuppose un point de vue interne de la part de celui qui souhaite en rendre compte. Le raisonnement juridique est ainsi conçu comme une argumentation pratique, subordonnée aux exigences de la rationalité car ceux qui participent à la pratique juridique sont contraints de donner (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • On The Reasonable in Law.Manuel Atienza - 1990 - Ratio Juris 3 (s1):148-161.
    In practical reasoning, reasonableness ‐ as opposed to rationality ‐ is an important concept. This paper explores the notion of reasonableness as applied exclusively to legal decisions. Conflicting values or legal requirements can make rationally deduced solutions unattainable, and may call for criteria of reasonableness, Conflicting values must be weighed, and weighed against each other, in search of a point of equilibrium between them. Legal cases are more or less difficult to solve, depending on the difficulty of finding a unique (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations