At the heart of the uniqueness debate is the possibility that the computer revolution may demand more in the way of ethical analysis than our traditional (that is, modern) ethical edification has prepared us for. In short, it may present new and unique problems and therefore demand new and unique solutions. In this article I argue that the solution is in fact an old and not‐so‐unique one: casuistry. Appealing to Jonsen and Toulmin's analysis of casuistry (1988), I argue that a (...) casuistic methodology is a more accurate description of the moral reasoning used by contemporary computer ethicists than are other accounts. In addition, I argue that the strengths that enabled casuistry to deal successfully with radical social, economic, and religious changes in the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries render casuistry well suited to the task of dealing with radically new situations like those found in twentieth‐ and twenty‐first‐century computer technology. Before concluding, I briefly explore Pascal's fatal critique of casuistry and its relevance for contemporary computer ethics. (shrink)

Does language make moral cognition possible? Some authors like Andy Clark have argued for a positive answer whereby language and the ways people use it mark a fundamental divide between humans and all other animals with respect to moral thinking (Clark, Mind and morals: essays on cognitive science and ethics. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 1996; Moral Epistemol Nat Can J Philos Suppl XXVI, 2000a; Moral Epistemol Nat Can J Philos Suppl XXVI, 2000b; Philosophy of mental representation. Oxford University Press, Oxford, (...) pp 37–43 and discussion, 44–61, 2002). I take issue with Clark’s view and argue that language is probably unnecessary for the emergence of moral cognition. I acknowledge, however, that humans unlike other animals seem to posses what Haugeland in Philosophy of mental representation. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2002) terms ‘norm-hungriness’: an idiosyncratic need or desire to create and abide by a multitude of norms. Our peculiar norm-hungriness, I suggest, depends on what can be called florid control rather than on language. (shrink)

Biological research has the capacity to inform ethical discussions. There are numerous questions about the nature of sexual orientation, intelligence, gender identity, etc., and many of these questions are commonly approached with the benefit of implicit or explicit biological commitments. The answers to these sorts of questions can have a powerful impact on social, ethical, and political positions. In this project I examine the prospect of naturalizing ethics under the umbrella of developmental systems theory (DST). If one is committed to (...) DST, then those ideas involved in DST that steer biological research will also have implications for ethics. There has been much debate over whether certain human traits or attributes are the consequence of nature or nurture. This kind of question tends to be articulated in dichotomous terms where the focal point of the discussion is over which opposing causal mechanism asserts the most power over the development of these attributes. The debate places particular importance on such distinctions as that between gene and environment, and biology and culture. DST seeks to dismiss such dichotomous accounts. In this sense, DST is an attempt to do biology without these dichotomies. In the process, DST articulates a reconceptualized notion of "the natural." I am interested in how DST’s reconceptualization of the natural can inform a naturalistic approach to ethics. Thus, the aim of this project is to examine the ramifications of taking DST as a guiding principle in the naturalization of ethics. (shrink)

This 183-page introductory part of my dissertation is an overview of some key debates in philosophical moral psychology and its methodology.

Aquí bosquejamos la “era post-Kohlbergniana” de la psicología moral, problematizando la relación psicología-filosofía. Si bien reconocemos las contribuciones de la teoría de etapas morales de Kohlberg para la psicología y la educación, creemos que la misma ha quedado al margen de los nuevos desarrollos psicológicos y no satisface las necesidades de los educadores del carácter contemporáneos. Basados en una descripción socio-cognitiva de la activación del conocimiento, proponemos un nuevo enfoque de la adquisición de virtudes, de la identidad y del comportamiento (...) moral no reflexivo, que elude algunos de los rompecabezas del enfoque evolutivo-cognitivo. También abordamos la cuestión de los límites disciplinarios, ya que el legado de Kohlberg le debe mucho a su compromiso con ciertos supuestos filosóficos sobre la moralidad, pero muchos filósofos que no comparten tales compromisos, cuestionan con razón cuáles deberían ser las fronteras entre la psicología moral y la filosofía moral. Sostenemos que el enfoque socio-cognitivo de la personalidad moral restablece esas fronteras al marchar desde una psicología moralizada hacia una moralidad psicologizada. Aunque esto implica reconsiderar el principio del fenomenalismo como base común, la perspectiva socio-cognitiva representa una base alternativa, para una colaboración ya en progreso, en el campo emergente de la ética naturalizada. (shrink)