Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. James V. Neel and Yuri E. Dubrova: Cold War Debates and the Genetic Effects of Low-Dose Radiation.Magdalena E. Stawkowski & Donna M. Goldstein - 2015 - Journal of the History of Biology 48 (1):67-98.
    This article traces disagreements about the genetic effects of low-dose radiation exposure as waged by James Neel, a central figure in radiation studies of Japanese populations after World War II, and Yuri Dubrova, who analyzed the 1986 Chernobyl nuclear power plant accident. In a 1996 article in Nature, Dubrova reported a statistically significant increase in the minisatellite DNA mutation rate in the children of parents who received a high dose of radiation from the Chernobyl accident, contradicting studies that found no (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  • The causation of disease - the practical and ethical consequences of competing explanations.Ulla Räisänen, Marie-Jet Bekkers, Paula Boddington, Srikant Sarangi & Angus Clarke - 2006 - Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 9 (3):293-306.
    The prevention, treatment and management of disease are closely linked to how the causes of a particular disease are explained. For multi-factorial conditions, the causal explanations are inevitably complex and competing models may exist to explain the same condition. Selecting one particular causal explanation over another will carry practical and ethical consequences that are acutely relevant for health policy. In this paper our focus is two-fold; the different models of causal explanation that are put forward within current scientific literature for (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   5 citations  
  • The Human Genome as Common Heritage: Common Sense or Legal Nonsense?Pilar N. Ossorio - 2007 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 35 (3):425-439.
    This essay identifies two legal lineages underlying the common heritage concept, and applies each to the human genome. The essay notes some advantages and disadvantages of each approach, and argues that patenting of human genes would be allowable under either approach.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   5 citations  
  • The Human Genome as Common Heritage: Common Sense or Legal Nonsense?Pilar N. Ossorio - 2007 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 35 (3):425-439.
    In the opening years of the 21st century, it became fashionable to describe the human genome as belonging to the common heritage of humanity. The United Nations, in its Universal Declaration on the Human Genome and Human Rights, now identifies the human genome as part of the common heritage, as does the international Human Genome Organization and the Council of Europe. The common heritage concept has played a prominent role in arguments against patenting the human genome or portions thereof. This (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   6 citations  
  • “An Unusual and Fast Disappearing Opportunity”: Infectious Disease, Indigenous Populations, and New Biomedical Knowledge in Amazonia, 1960–1970.Rosanna Dent & Ricardo Ventura Santos - 2017 - Perspectives on Science 25 (5):585-605.
    In 1966, a team made up of Brazilian and foreign scientists spent a week carefully recording the body temperature and other clinical signs and symptoms of 110 Tiriyó Indigenous people in their communities along the Brazil-Suriname border. Led by the Yale University virologist and immunologist Francis Black, the researchers faced an "epidemic" with a special profile, distinct from those most common in Indigenous populations, which usually resulted in widespread illness, the collapse of subsistence activities, hunger, and as a rule, elevated (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  • Ethno-biology during the Cold War: Biocca's Expedition to Amazonia.Daniele Cozzoli - 2016 - Centaurus 58 (4):281-309.
    This article focuses on the ethno-biological expedition to the Amazon headed by Ettore Biocca between November 1962 and July 1963. Biocca, a parasitologist by training, assembled a multidisciplinary team to carry out an ethno-biological study of Amazon natives. The expedition work covered the natives' customs, myths, chants, diseases and the hallucinogenic compounds and curare they used, and took into account plants and animals common to the Amazon environment. This article aims to contribute to the understanding of the 20th-century Western approach (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark