Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. Relative Versus Absolute Standards for Everyday Risk in Adolescent HIV Prevention Trials: Expanding the Debate.Jeremy Snyder, Cari L. Miller & Glenda Gray - 2011 - American Journal of Bioethics 11 (6):5 - 13.
    The concept of minimal risk has been used to regulate and limit participation by adolescents in clinical trials. It can be understood as setting an absolute standard of what risks are considered minimal or it can be interpreted as relative to the actual risks faced by members of the host community for the trial. While commentators have almost universally opposed a relative interpretation of the environmental risks faced by potential adolescent trial participants, we argue that the ethical concerns against the (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   17 citations  
  • Preventing Transmission of HIV--A Special Symposium.M. Verweij & A. Dawson - 2010 - Public Health Ethics 3 (3):191-192.
    (No abstract is available for this citation).
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Ethical challenges in HIV microbicide research: What protections do women need?Ruth Macklin - 2011 - International Journal of Feminist Approaches to Bioethics 4 (2):124-143.
    Finding an effective method that can lower women’s risk of HIV infection is an ethical imperative. A vaginal microbicide is a preventive method that can be controlled by women. Well-designed scientific research has already yielded modest success, yet more research is needed in order to develop an even better product. But just as research must be scientifically sound, it must also be ethically sound. Ethical challenges in HIV microbicide research include issues of safety and level of efficacy, whether pregnant women (...)
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   4 citations  
  • Normative and Non-normative Concepts: Paternalism and Libertarian Paternalism.Kalle Grill - 2013 - In Daniel Strech, Irene Hirschberg & Georg Marckmann (eds.), Ethics in Public Health and Health Policy. Springer. pp. 27-46.
    This chapter concerns the normativity of the concepts of paternalism and libertarian paternalism. The first concept is central in evaluating public health policy, but its meaning is controversial. The second concept is equally controversial and has received much attention recently. It may or may not shape the future evaluation of public health policy. In order to facilitate honest and fruitful debate, I consider three approaches to these concepts, in terms of their normativity. Concepts, I claim, may be considered nonnormative, normatively (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations