Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. A method for conceptualising legal domains. An example from the dutch unemployment benefits act.Pepijn Visser, Trevor Bench-Capon & Jaap van den Herik - 1997 - Artificial Intelligence and Law 5 (3):207-242.
    There has been much talk of the need to build intermediate models of the expertise required preparatory to constructing a knowledge-based system in the legal domain. Such models offer advantages for verification, validation, maintenance and reuse. As yet, however, few such models have been reported at a useful level of detail. In this paper we describe a method for conceptualising legal domains as well as its application to a substantial fragment of the Dutch Unemployment Benefits Act (DUBA).We first discuss the (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  • A Formal Model of Legal Argumentation.Giovanni Sartor - 1994 - Ratio Juris 7 (2):177-211.
  • Law and logic: A review from an argumentation perspective.Henry Prakken & Giovanni Sartor - 2015 - Artificial Intelligence 227 (C):214-245.
  • Thirty years of Artificial Intelligence and Law: the first decade. [REVIEW]Guido Governatori, Trevor Bench-Capon, Bart Verheij, Michał Araszkiewicz, Enrico Francesconi & Matthias Grabmair - 2022 - Artificial Intelligence and Law 30 (4):481-519.
    The first issue of _Artificial Intelligence and Law_ journal was published in 1992. This paper provides commentaries on landmark papers from the first decade of that journal. The topics discussed include reasoning with cases, argumentation, normative reasoning, dialogue, representing legal knowledge and neural networks.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  • Thirty years of Artificial Intelligence and Law: Editor’s Introduction.Trevor Bench-Capon - 2022 - Artificial Intelligence and Law 30 (4):475-479.
    The first issue of _Artificial Intelligence and Law_ journal was published in 1992. This special issue marks the 30th anniversary of the journal by reviewing the progress of the field through thirty commentaries on landmark papers and groups of papers from that journal.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Argument in artificial intelligence and law.Trevor Bench-Capon - 1997 - Artificial Intelligence and Law 5 (4):249-261.
    In this paper I shall discuss the notion of argument, and the importanceof argument in AI and Law. I shall distinguish four areas where argument hasbeen applied: in modelling legal reasoning based on cases; in thepresentation and explanation of results from a rule based legal informationsystem; in the resolution of normative conflict and problems ofnon-monotonicity; and as a basis for dialogue games to support the modellingof the process of argument. The study of argument is held to offer prospectsof real progress (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   14 citations  
  • Lógicas no-monotónicas y conflictos normativos: un análisis crítico.Txetxu Ausín - 2000 - Revista de Filosofía (Madrid) 23 (1):85.
    El problema de los conflictos normativos ha constituido uno de los principales obstáculos para un tratamiento lógico-formal de los razo namientos jurídicos. Una de las recientes estrategias para abordar esta cuestión se apoya en las lógicas no-monotónicas desarrolladas en el ámbito de la Inteligencia Artificial con el fin de representar el razona miento común. Sin embargo, un análisis en detalle nos llevará a cuestio nar este entoque.
    No categories
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark