Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. Accessing the meaning of invisible words.Yung-Hao Yang & Su-Ling Yeh - 2011 - Consciousness and Cognition 20 (2):223-233.
    Previous research has shown implicit semantic processing of faces or pictures, but whether symbolic carriers such as words can be processed this way remains controversial. Here we examine this issue by adopting the continuous flash suppression paradigm to ensure that the processing undergone is indeed unconscious without the involvement of partial awareness. Negative or neutral words projected into one eye were made invisible due to strong suppression induced by dynamic-noise patterns shown in the other eye through binocular rivalry. Inverted and (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   15 citations  
  • Semantic and subword elements of unconscious priming: Commentary on Kouider and Dupoux (2007)☆.Richard L. Abrams & Jessica Grinspan - 2007 - Consciousness and Cognition 16 (4):957-958.
  • Recruitment of newly acquired category exemplars into unconscious processing systems is rapid and durable.Reed M. Morgan & Richard L. Abrams - 2021 - Consciousness and Cognition 95 (C):103205.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Rich experience and sensory memory.Elizabeth Irvine - unknown
    One of the possible ways to explain the experience of visual richness is to posit a level of nonconceptual or phenomenal experience. The contents of this level of experience have recently been equated with the contents of sensory memory. It will be argued that sensory memory cannot provide these contents along two broad points. First, the conception of sensory memory relied on by these authors conflates the phenomena of visible and informational persistence, and makes use of an outdated “iconic” model (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  • Overflow, access, and attention.Ned Block - 2007 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 30 (5-6):530-548.
    In this response to 32 commentators, I start by clarifying the overflow argument. I explain why the distinction between generic and specific phenomenology is important and why we are justified in acknowledging specific phenomenology in the overflow experiments. Other issues discussed are the relations among report, cognitive access, and attention; panpsychic disaster; the mesh between psychology and neuroscience; and whether consciousness exists.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   41 citations