Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. Absolute Time: The Limit of Kant's Idealism.Marius Stan - 2019 - Noûs 53 (2):433-461.
    I examine here if Kant can explain our knowledge of duration by showing that time has metric structure. To do so, I spell out two possible solutions: time’s metric could be intrinsic or extrinsic. I argue that Kant’s resources are too weak to secure an intrinsic, transcendentally-based temporal metrics; but he can supply an extrinsic metric, based in a metaphysical fact about matter. I conclude that Transcendental Idealism is incomplete: it cannot account for the durative aspects of experience—or it can (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • Necessary existential dependence.Ian Hinckfuss - 1976 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 54 (2):123 – 132.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
    		•
  • Physics by convention.Clark Glymour - 1972 - Philosophy of Science 39 (3):322-340.
    “It ain't nuthin' until I call it.”Bill Guthrie, UmpireNumerous criticisms of Adolf Grünbaum's account of conventions in physics have been published, and he has replied to most of them. Nonetheless, there seem to me to be good reasons for offering further criticism. In the first place Grünbaum's philosophy seems to me at least partly an extrapolation of one aspect of the views on conventions developed by Reichenbach and others. Since I think many of the issues which Reichenbach attempted to settle (...)
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   7 citations  
  • On conventionality and simultaneity - a reply.Brian Ellis - 1971 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 49 (2):177 – 203.
    This paper is a response to the "panel discussion of simultaneity by slow clock transport in the special and general theories of relativity" ("philosophy of science", 36, (march, 1969), Pp. 1-81) which arose out of a paper by brian ellis and peter bowman on "conventionality in distant simultaneity", ("philosophy of science", 34, (june, 1967), Pp. 116-36). It is argued that the basic disagreement between the pittsburgh panel and us is an epistemological one. In particular, Our concept of a good physical (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   4 citations  
  • Space, Time and Falsifiability Critical Exposition and Reply to "A Panel Discussion of Grünbaum's Philosophy of Science".Adolf Grünbaum - 1970 - Philosophy of Science 37 (4):469 - 588.
    Prompted by the "Panel Discussion of Grünbaum's Philosophy of Science" (Philosophy of Science 36, December, 1969) and other recent literature, this essay ranges over major issues in the philosophy of space, time and space-time as well as over problems in the logic of ascertaining the falsity of a scientific hypothesis. The author's philosophy of geometry has recently been challenged along three main distinct lines as follows: (i) The Panel article by G. J. Massey calls for a more precise and more (...)
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   19 citations