Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. ¿Es cartesiano el “teatro cartesiano” de Dennett?: Un análisis crítico desde el trialismo y el ens per se.Rodrigo Alfonso González Fernández & Felipe Morales Carbonell - 2024 - Anales Del Seminario de Historia de la Filosofía 41 (1):143-153.
    Este artículo examina cómo la separabilidad y unidad mente-cuerpo resultan clave para poner de manifiesto lo inapropiado del “teatro cartesiano”, metáfora creada por Daniel Dennett para criticar la experiencia consciente unificada en Descartes. La primera sección introduce al problema de la separabilidad cartesiana. La segunda examina cómo mente y cuerpo, separables mediante lo concebible según Descartes, resultan ser cosas metafísicamente distintas. La tercera enfatiza como separables no implica separados. La última sección enfatiza el argumento de la dis-analogía del piloto y (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • A True Mode of Union: Reconsidering the Cartesian Human Being.Amber Carlson - unknown
    When considering the nature of the human being, Descartes holds two main claims: he believes that the human being is a genuine unity and he also holds that it is comprised of two distinct substances, mind and body. These claims appear to be at odds with one another; it is not clear how the human being can be simultaneously two things and one thing. The details of Descartes' metaphysics of substance exacerbates this problem. Because of various theological and epistemological commitments, (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
    		•
  • Співвідношення понять субстанційного союзу і взаємодії душі й тіла у філософії декарт.Дмитро Сепетий - 2018 - Sententiae 37 (1):136-152.
    The author argues for the reductive interpretation of Descartes’ notion of the substantial union of soul and body, according to which the union is reduced to causal interactions. The opponents countered the reductive approach with the claims that Descartes attributed sensations to the union rather than the soul; held that the soul is the substantial form of the body; identified some special conditions of the human body’s self-identity. In the article, the case is made that these claims lack clear textual (...)
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • The Relationship between the Notions of the Substantial Union and Interaction of Soul and Body in Descartes’ Philosophy.Dmytro Sepetyi - 2018 - Sententiae 37 (1):136-152.
    The author argues for the reductive interpretation of Descartes’ notion of the substantial union of soul and body, according to which the union is reduced to causal interactions. The opponents countered the reductive approach with the claims that Descartes (1) attributed sensations to the union rather than the soul; (2) held that the soul is the substantial form of the body; (3) identified some special conditions of the human body’s self-identity. In the article, the case is made that (a) these (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  • Descartes’ Notion of Meum Corpus and Jean-Luc Marion’s Challenge to “the Myth of Cartesian Dualism”.Dmytro Sepetyi - 2023 - Sententiae 42 (2):6-22.
    Jean-Luc Marion, in his latest book, “Sur la pensée passive de Descartes,” recently published in an English translation, challenges something he refers to, in the English subtitle, as “the Myth of Cartesian Dualism” and counters it with his original interpretation of Descartes’ notion of meum corpus. This article explores the reasons he adduces for this purpose. The case is made that Marion fails to provide sufficiently solid argumentative and textual support for his construal in this respect and that traditional substance (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
    		•
  • Adding Substance to the Debate: Descartes on Freedom of the Will.Brian Collins - 2013 - Essays in Philosophy 14 (2):218-238.
    It is widely accepted by commentators that Descartes believed in freedom of the will, but it is fiercely debated whether he accepted a libertarian or compatibilist notion of freedom. With this paper I argue that an examination of Descartes’ conception of ‘substance,’ specifically his distinction between divine substance and created substance, is a fruitful source for the debate regarding Descartes on freedom of the will. I argue that the commentators who read Descartes as a libertarian are forced to focus on (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  • Cottingam’s Conception of Descrates’s Trialism and Modern Discussions.Lubov Bodnarchuk & Anastasia Sen’ - 2014 - Sententiae 30 (1):196-209.
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   6 citations