Skip to main content
Log in

Analogical Reasoning and Modeling in the Sciences

  • Discussion
  • Published:
Foundations of Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper aims at integrating the work onanalogical reasoning in Cognitive Science into thelong trend of philosophical interest, in this century,in analogical reasoning as a basis for scientificmodeling. In the first part of the paper, threesimulations of analogical reasoning, proposed incognitive science, are presented: Gentner's StructureMatching Engine, Mitchel's and Hofstadter's COPYCATand the Analogical Constraint Mapping Engine, proposedby Holyoak and Thagard. The differences andcontroversial points in these simulations arehighlighted in order to make explicit theirpresuppositions concerning the nature of analogicalreasoning. In the last part, this debate in cognitivescience is applied to some traditional philosophicalaccounts of formal and material analogies as a basisfor scientific modeling, like Mary Hesse`s, and tomore recent ones, that already draw from the work inArtificial Intelligence, like that proposed byAronson, Harré and Way.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

REFERENCES

  • P. Achinstein: 1968, Concepts of Science. Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore.

    Google Scholar 

  • J.L. Aronson, R. Harré and E.C. Way: 1995, Realism Rescued: How Scientific Progress is Possible. Open Court, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • P. Bartha: 1994, Analogical Reasoning and Plausibility in the Sciences. Doctoral dissertation, Department of Philosophy, University of Pittsburgh.

  • M. Black: 1962, Models and Metaphors. Cornell University Press, Ithaca.

    Google Scholar 

  • M. Black: 1979, More about Metaphor. In A. Ortony (ed.), Metaphor and Thought. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 10-43.

    Google Scholar 

  • R.B. Braithwaite: 1953, Scientific Explanation. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • J.R. Brown: 1986, Sellars, Concepts and Conceptual Change. Synthese 68: 275-307.

    Google Scholar 

  • N.R. Campbell: 1920, Physics: The Elements. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • N. Cartwright: 1993, How We Relate Theory to Observation. In P. Horwich (ed.), World Changes. The MIT Press, Cambridge, pp. 259-273.

    Google Scholar 

  • A. Clark: 1993, Associative Engines: Connectionism, Concepts and Representational Change. The MIT Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • J. Cushing: 1982, Models and Methodologies in Current Theoretical High-Energy Physics. Synthese 50: 5-101.

    Google Scholar 

  • T. Dartnall (ed.): 1994, Artificial Intelligence and Creativity: An Interdisciplinary Approach. Kluwer, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • G. Dejong: 1989, The Role of Explanation in Analogy; or, The Curse of an alluring Name. In S. Vosniadou and A. Ortony (eds.), Similarity and Analogical Reasoning. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 346-365.

    Google Scholar 

  • C. Dierbach and D. Chester: 1991, A Formal Basis for Analogical Reasoning. In J.A. Allen, R. Fikes and E. Sandewall (eds.), Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning: Proceedings of the Second International Conference. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, San Mateo.

    Google Scholar 

  • R.M. French: 1995, The Subtlety of Sameness: A Theory and Computer Model of Analogy-Making. The MIT Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • D. Gentner: 1982, Are Scientific Analogies Metaphors? In D.S. Miall (ed.), Metaphor: Problems and Perspectives. Harvester Press, Brighton, pp. 106-132.

    Google Scholar 

  • D. Gentner: 1983, Structure-Mapping: A Theoretical Framework for Analogy. Cognitive Science 7: 155-170.

    Google Scholar 

  • D. Gentner: 1989, The Mechanisms of Analogical Learning. In S. Vosniadou and A. Ortony (eds.), Similarity and Analogical Reasoning. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 199-241.

    Google Scholar 

  • D. Gentner and D. Gentner: 1983, Flowing Waters or Teeming Crowds: Mental Models of Electricity. In D. Gentner and A.L. Stevens (eds.), Mental Models. Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale, pp. 99-129.

    Google Scholar 

  • R. Giere: 1988, Explaining Science: A Cognitive Approach. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • N. Goodman: 1976, Languages of Art. Hackett Publishing Co., Indianapolis.

    Google Scholar 

  • R.P. Hall: 1989, Computational Approaches to Analogical Reasoning: A Comparative Analysis. Artificial Intelligence 39: 39-120.

    Google Scholar 

  • R. Harré: 1970, The Principles of Scientific Thinking. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • R. Harré: 1987, Varieties of Realism. Blackwell, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • R. Harré: 1988, Where Models and Analogies Really Count. International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 2: 118-133.

    Google Scholar 

  • D.H. Helman (ed.): 1988, Analogical Reasoning. Kluwer, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • C.G. Hempel: 1965, Aspects of Scientific Explanation. Free Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • M. Hesse: 1954, Models in Physics. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 4: 198-214.

    Google Scholar 

  • M. Hesse: 1961, Forces and Fields. Littlefield, Adams & Co., Totowa.

    Google Scholar 

  • M. Hesse: 1966, Models and Analogies in Science. University of Notre Dame Press, Notre Dame.

    Google Scholar 

  • M. Hesse: 1967, Models and Analogy in Science. In P. Edwards (ed.), Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Vol. 5. pp. 354-359.

  • M. Hesse: 1988, Theories, Family Resemblances and Analogy. In D.H. Helman (ed.), Analogical Reasoning. Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp. 317-340.

    Google Scholar 

  • D. Hofstadter et al.: 1995, Fluid Concepts and Creative Analogies. Basic Books, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • K. Holyoak and P. Thagard: 1989, A Computational Model of Analogical Problem-Solving. In S. Vosniadou and A. Ortony (eds.), Similarity and Analogical Reasoning. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 242-266.

    Google Scholar 

  • K. Holyoak and P. Thagard: 1995, Mental Leaps. The MIT Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • B. Indurkhya: 1992, Metaphor and Cognition. Kluwer, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • S. Kedar-Cabelli: 1988, Analogy — from a Unified Perspective. In D.H. Helman (ed.), Analogical Reasoning. Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp. 65-103.

    Google Scholar 

  • P. Kroes: 1989, Structural Analogies Between Physical Systems. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 40: 145-154.

    Google Scholar 

  • R. McLaughlin: 1982, Invention and Appraisal. In R. McLaughlin (ed.), What? Where? When? Why? Reidel, Dordrecht, pp. 69-100.

    Google Scholar 

  • M. Mitchell: 1989, Analogy-Making as Perception. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • C.T. Morrison: 1994, Analogy and Constructive Representation. Master thesis, State University of New York at Binghamton.

  • E. Nagel: 1961, The Structure of Science. Routledge & Kegan Paul, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • N. Nersessian: 1987, A Cognitive-Historical Approach to Meaning in Scientific Theories. In N. Nersessian (ed.), The Process of Science: Contemporary Philosophical Approaches to Understanding Scientific Practice. Nijhoff, Dordrecht, pp. 161-178.

    Google Scholar 

  • N. Nersessian: 1992, How do Scientists Think? Capturing the Dynamics of Conceptual Change in Science. In R. Giere (ed.), Cognitive Models of Science. University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis, pp. 3-44.

    Google Scholar 

  • S. Owen: 1990, Analogy for Automated Reasoning. Academic Press, Boston.

    Google Scholar 

  • S.E. Palmer: 1989, Levels of Description in Information-Processing Theories of Analogy. In S. Vosniadou and A. Ortony (eds.), Similarity and Analogical Reasoning. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 332-345.

    Google Scholar 

  • M. Redhead: 1980, Models in Physics. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 31: 145-163.

    Google Scholar 

  • L.J. Rips: 1989. Similarity, Typicality, and Categorization. In S. Vosniadou and A. Ortony (eds.), Similarity and Analogical Reasoning. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 21-59.

    Google Scholar 

  • W. Sellars: 1965, Scientific Realism or Irenic Instrumentalism. In R.S. Cohen and M.W. Wartofsky (eds.), Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science, Vol. 2, pp. 171-204.

  • M. Steiner: 1989, The Application of Mathematics to Natural Science. Journal of Philosophy 86: 449-480.

    Google Scholar 

  • P. Thagard: 1992, Conceptual Revolutions. Princeton University Press, Princeton.

    Google Scholar 

  • B. van Fraassen: 1987, The Semantic Approach to Scientific Theories. In N. Nersessian (ed.), The Process of Science. Nijhoff, Dordrecht, pp. 105-124.

    Google Scholar 

  • S. Vosniadou: 1989, Analogical Reasoning as a Mechanism in Knowledge Acquisition: A Developmental Perspective. In S. Vosniadou and A. Ortony (eds.), Similarity and Analogical Reasoning. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 413-437.

    Google Scholar 

  • S. Vosniadou and A. Ortony (eds.): 1989, Similarity and Analogical Reasoning. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • E.C. Way: 1991, Knowledge Representation and Metaphor. Kluwer, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Abrantes, P. Analogical Reasoning and Modeling in the Sciences. Foundations of Science 4, 237–270 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009623823171

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009623823171

Navigation