Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The Leadership Archetype: A Jungian Analysis of Similarities between Modern Leadership Theory and the Abraham Myth in the Judaic–Christian Tradition

  • Published:
Journal of Business Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Archetypal psychology suggests the possibility of a leadership archetype representing the unconscious preferences of human beings as a species about the appropriate relationships between leaders and followers. Mythological analysis compared God’s leadership in the Abraham myth with modern visionary, ethical and situational leadership to find similarities reflecting continuities in human thinking about leadership over as long as 3600 years. God’s leadership behavior is very modern except that God is generally more relationship oriented. The leadership archetype that emerges is of a leader that develops his/her follower by reliably maintaining a vision, behaving according to firm ethical values even when it weakens the leader’s authority, accepting suffering when the follower is unreliable, and always forgiving even when the follower behaves with hubris in an attempt to overthrow the leader. If God’s leadership principles were mandatory in management, many dysfunctional leaders would be disqualified and many of the negative consequences of poor leadership might be averted.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abramson, N. R.: 2006, ‘Applying the Cognitive Theory of Strategy Process: A Comparative Analysis of Japanese and Chinese Strategic Preferences’, The Journal of Current Research in Global Business 9(13), 1–13

    Google Scholar 

  • Blake R. R., Mouton J. S. (1977) The Managerial Grid: Key Orientations for Achieving Production Through People. Gulf Publishing, Houston

    Google Scholar 

  • Bostock, D.: 1999, ‘Plato’, in T. Honderich (ed.), The Philosophers: Introducing Great Western Thinkers (Oxford University Press, Oxford), pp. 15–21

  • Brown D. E. (1991) Human Universals. McGraw-Hill, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Brueggemann W. (1982) Genesis Interpretation: A Bible Commentary for Teaching and Preaching. John Knox Press, Atlanta

    Google Scholar 

  • Buckingham M., Coffman C. (1999) First Break All the Rules: What the World’s Greatest Managers Do Differently. Simon & Schuster, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Buss D. (1999) Evolutionary Psychology: A New Science of the Mind. Allyn & Bacon, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, J.: 1973, The Hero with a Thousand Faces (Princeton University Press, Princeton)

  • Campbell J. (1991) The Power of Myth with Bill Moyers. Anchor Books, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Corrigan P. (1999) Shakespeare on Management: Leadership Lessons for Today’s Managers. Kogan Page, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Derrida, J.: 1978, ‘Structure, Sign, and Play in the Discourses of the Human Sciences’, in J. Derrida (ed.), Writing and Difference (University of Chicago Press, Chicago), pp. 278–293

  • Fiedler F. E. (1967) A Theory of Leadership Effectiveness. McGraw-Hill, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Fox R. (1975) Encounter with Anthropology. Peregrine, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Gardner R. (1988) Psychic Syndromes as Infrastructure for Intra-Specific Communication. In: Chance M. R. A. (ed) Social Fabrics of the Mind. Lawrence Erlbaum, Hove, pp. 197–225

    Google Scholar 

  • Grojean M. W., Christian C. J., Dickson M. W., Smith D. B. (2004) Leaders, Values and Organizational Climate: Examining Leadership for Establishing an Organizational Climate Regarding Ethics. Journal of Business Ethics 55:223–241

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hall J. R. (1999) Cultures of Inquiry: From Epistemology to Discourse in Sociohistorical Research. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Hersey P., Blanchard K. H. (1972) Management of Organizational Behavior, 2nd Edition. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs

    Google Scholar 

  • Hersey P., Blanchard K. H. (1993) Management of Organizational Behavior: Utilizing Human Resources. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs

    Google Scholar 

  • Hopcke R. H. (1999) A Guided Tour of the Collected Works of C.G. Jung. Shambhala, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  • House, R. J.: 1971, ‘A Path-Goal Theory of Leader Effectiveness’, Administrative Science Quarterly September, 321–338

  • Jung C. G. (1977a) The Collected Works of C.G. Jung, Volume 8: The Structure and Dynamics of the Psyche. Princeton University Press, Princeton

    Google Scholar 

  • Jung C. G. (1977b) The Collected Works of C.G. Jung, Volume 9: The Archetypes and the Collective Unconscious. Princeton University Press, Princeton

    Google Scholar 

  • Keirsey D. (1998) Please Understand Me II: Temperament, Character, Intelligence. Prometheus Nemesis, Del Mar

    Google Scholar 

  • Kets de Vries M. (1989) Prisoners of Leadership. John Wiley & Sons, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Kets de Vries M. (1995) Organizational Pradoxes: Clinical Approaches to Management. Routledge, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Kets de Vries M. (2001) The Leadership Mystique: A User’s Manual for the Human Enterprise. Financial Times Prentice Hall, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Kierkegaard S. (1985) Fear and Trembling. Penguin Books, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Kummerow J. M., Barger N. J., Kirby L. K. (1997) Work Types. Warner, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Lumsden C. J., Wilson E. O. (1981) Genes, Minds and Culture. Harvard University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayo, A. J. and N. Nohria: 2005, ‘Zeitgeist Leadership’, Harvard Business Review October, 45–60

  • Murdock, G. P.: 1964, ‘The Common Denominator of Culture’, in R. Linden (ed.), The Science of Man in the World Crisis (Columbia University Press, New York), pp. 123–142

  • Neitzsche F. (1986) Human All Too Human. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Neumann E. (1974) The Great Mother: An Analysis of the Archetype. Princeton University Press, Princeton

    Google Scholar 

  • Quin, R. E.: 2005, ‘Moments of Greatness: Entering the Fundamental State of Leadership’, Harvard Business Review July–August, 74–85

  • Reddin W. J. (1970) Managerial Effectiveness. McGraw-Hill, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Robbins S. P., Langton N. (1999) Organization Behavior: Concepts, Controversies, Applications. Prentice Hall Canada, Scarborough

    Google Scholar 

  • Satinover J. (1995) Psychopharmacology in Jungian Practice. In: Stein M. (ed) Jungian Analysis. Open Court, LaSalle

    Google Scholar 

  • Schein E. H. (1992) Organizational Culture and Leadership. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco

    Google Scholar 

  • Segal R. A. (2004) Myth: A Very Short Introduction. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharp D. (1998) Jungian Psychology Unplugged. Inner City Books, Toronto

    Google Scholar 

  • Sievers B. (1996) Greek Mythology as Means of Organizational Analysis: The Battle of Larkfield. Leadership and Organization Development Journal 17(6):32–40

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stein M. (1998) Jung’s Map of the Soul: An Introduction. Open Court, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  • Stein M. (2005) The Othelo Conundrum: The Inner Contagion of Leadership. Organization Studies 26(9):1405–1419

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stevens A. (1993) The Two Million – Year – Old Self. Texas A&M University Press, College Station

    Google Scholar 

  • Stevens A. (2003) Archetype Revisited: An Updated Natural History of the Self. Inner City Books, Toronto

    Google Scholar 

  • Stinson J. E., Johnson T. W. (1975) The Path-Goal Theory of Management: A Partial Test and Suggested Refinement. Academy of Management Journal 18(2):242–252

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Suggs M. J., Sakenfeld K. D., Mueller J. R. (eds) (1992) The Oxford Study Bible: Revised English Bible with the Apocrypha. Oxford University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Tinbergen N. (1951) The Study of Instinct. Oxford University Press, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Tresan, D.: 1995, ‘Jungian Metapsychology and Neurobiological Theory: Auspicious Correspondence’, in IAAP Congress Proceedings, Daimon Verlag, Einsiedeln, pp. 1–16

  • Waddington C. H. (1957) The Strategy of the Genes: A Discussion of Some Aspects of Theoretical Biology. George Allen & Unwin, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Wertime K. (2002) Building Brands and Believers: How to Connect with Consumers using Archetypes. John Wily & Sons Asia, Singapore

    Google Scholar 

  • Westley F. R. (1989) Visionary Leadership and Strategic Management. Strategic Management Journal 10:17–32

    Google Scholar 

  • Winstanley, D.: 2004, ‘Phaethon: Seizing the Reins of Power’, in Y. Gabriel (ed.), Myths, Stories and Organizations: Premodern Narratives for Our Times (Oxford University Press, Oxford), pp. 176–191

  • Worden S. (2003) The Role of Integrity as a Mechanism in Strategic Leadership. Journal of Business Ethics 56:31–44

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Worden S. (2005) Religion in Strategic Leadership: A Positivistic Normative/Theological, and Strategic Analysis. Journal of Business Ethics 57:221–239

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zaleznik, A.: 1977, ‘Managers and Leaders: Are They Different’, Harvard Business Review May–June, 67–78

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Faculty of Business Administration, Simon Fraser University, 8888 University Drive, Burnaby, BC, V5A 1S6, Canada

    Neil Remington Abramson

Authors
  1. Neil Remington Abramson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Neil Remington Abramson.

Additional information

Neil Remington Abramson is an Associate Professor of Strategy, Specialist in building effective business relationships in comparative management contexts.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Abramson, N.R. The Leadership Archetype: A Jungian Analysis of Similarities between Modern Leadership Theory and the Abraham Myth in the Judaic–Christian Tradition. J Bus Ethics 72, 115–129 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-006-9159-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-006-9159-5

Keywords

Search

Navigation