Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Sequence of Tense and Temporal de re

  • Published:
Linguistics and Philosophy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Abusch, D.: 1988, ‘Sequence of Tense, Intensionality and Scope’, in H. Borer (ed.), The Proceedings of the 7th West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics, The Stanford Linguistics Association.

  • Abusch, D.: 1991, ‘The Present under Past as De Re Interpretation’, in D. Bates (ed.), The Proceedings of the 10th West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics, The Stanford Linguistics Association.

  • Abusch, D.: 1994, ‘Sequence of Tense Revisited: Two Semantic Accounts of Tense in Intensional Contexts’, in H. Kamp (ed.), Ellipsis, Tense and Questions, Dyana-2 Esprit Basic research Project 6852, Deliverable R2.2.B. Shorter version appeared in P. Dekker, and M. Stokhof (eds.), Proceedings of the 9th Amsterdam Colloquium, 1993, ILLC, Dept. of Philosophy, University of Amsterdam.

  • Abusch, D.: 1995, ‘Constraints on Tense’, Paper presented at the conference Context Dependence in the Analysis of Linguistic Meaning, February 1995, Prague.

  • Cooper, R.: 1979, ‘The Interpretation of Pronouns’, in F. Heny and H. S. Schnelle (eds.), Syntax and Semantics 10: Selections from the Third Groningen Round Table, Academic Press, New York, pp. 61–92.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cresswell, M.: 1973, Logic and Language, Methuen, London.

  • Cresswell, M. and A. von Stechow: 1982, ‘De Re Belief Generalized’, Linguistics and Philosophy 5(4), 503–535.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dowty, D.: 1982, ‘Tenses, Time Adverbs and Compositional Semantic Theory’, Linguistics and Philosophy 9, 405–426.

    Google Scholar 

  • Enç, M.: 1987, ‘Anchoring Conditions for Tense’, Linguistics Inquiry 18, 633–657.

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans, G.: 1980, ‘Pronouns’, Linguistic Inquiry 11.

  • Heim, I.: 1994, ‘Comments on Abusch's Theory of Tense’, in H. Kamp (ed.), Ellipsis, Tense and Questions, Dyana-2 Esprit Basic Research Project 6852, Deliverable R2.2.B.

  • Hinrichs, E.: 1986, ‘Temporal Anaphora in Discourse of English’, Linguistics and Philosophy 9(1), 63–82.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hinrichs, E.: 1988, ‘Tense, Quantifiers and Contexts’, Computational Linguistics 14(2).

  • Kamp, H.: 1979, ‘Events, Instances and Temporal Reference’, in R. Bäuerle and U. Egll (eds.), Semantics from Different Points of View, Springer-Verlag, Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kamp, H.: 1981, ‘Evenements, Reprentations Discoursives et Reference Temporelle’, Language 64, 39–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kamp, H. and C. Rohrer: 1984, Indirect Discourse, Manuscript, University of Texas, Austin and University of Stuttgart.

  • Kaplan, D.: 1969, ‘Quantifying in’, in D. Davidson and J. Hintikka (eds.), Words and Objections, Reidel, Dordrocht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ladusaw, W.: 1977, ‘Some Problems with Tenses in PTQ’, Texas Linguistic Forum 6, 89–102, University of Texas, Austin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Montague, R.: 1973, ‘The Proper Treatment of Quantification in Ordinary English’, in J. Hintikka, J. Moravcsik, and P. Suppes (eds.), Approaches to Natural Language, D. Reidel, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Link, G.: 1979, Montague Grammatik, Muenchen.

  • Lewis, D.: 1979, ‘Attitude De Dicto and De Se’, Philosophical Review 88, 513–543.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nerbonne, J.: 1986, ‘Reference Time in Narration’, Linguistics and Philosophy 9(1), 83–95.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ogihara, T.: 1989, Temporal Reference in English and Japanese, Ph.D. Thesis, University of Texas at Austin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Partee, B.: 1973, ‘Some Structural Analogics Between Tenses and Pronouns in English’, The Journal of Philosophy 70, 601–609.

    Google Scholar 

  • Partee, B.: 1984, ‘Nominal and Temporal Anaphora’, Linguistics and Philosophy 7(3) 243–286.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perry, J.: 1977, ‘Frege on Demonstratives’, Philosophical Review 86, 474–497.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quine, W. V. O.: 1956, ‘Quantifiers and Propositional Attitudes’, The Journal of Philosophy 53, 183–194.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quine, W. V. O.: 1969, ‘Propositional Objects’, in W. V. O. Quine (ed.), Ontological Relativity and Other Essays, Columbia University Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, C.: 1978, ‘The Syntax and Semantics of Temporal Expressions in English’, Linguistics and Philosophy 2, 43–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stechow, von A.: 1994, Tense in Intensional Context, manuscript, Blaubeuren, October 1994.

  • Stechow, von A.: 1995, ‘On the Proper Treatment of Tense’ to appear in Proceedings of Salt 5, UT, Austin.

  • Stowell, T.: 1993, Syntax of Tense, manuscript, USC, April 1993.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Institut für maschinelle Sprachverarbeitung, Universität Stuttgart, Azenbergstr. 12, 70174, Stuttgart, Germany

    Dorit Abusch

Authors
  1. Dorit Abusch
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Abusch, D. Sequence of Tense and Temporal de re. Linguistics and Philosophy 20, 1–50 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005331423820

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005331423820

Keywords

Search

Navigation