Abstract.
Syllogisms like Barbara, “If all S is M and all M is P, then all S is P”, are here analyzed not in terms of the truth of their categorical constituents, “all S is M”, etc., but rather in terms of the corresponding proportions, e.g., of Ss that are Ms. This allows us to consider the inferences’ approximate validity, and whether the fact that most Ss are Ms and most Ms are Ps guarantees that most Ss are Ps. It turns out that no standard syllogism is universally valid in this sense, but special ‘default rules’ govern approximate reasoning of this kind. Special attention is paid to inferences involving existential propositions of the “Some S is M” form, where it is does not make sense to say “Almost some S is M”, but where it is important that in everyday speech, “Some” does not mean “At least one”, but rather “A not insignificant number”.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
E.W. Adams (1966) ArticleTitleOn the Nature and Purpose of Measurement Synthese 16 225–269 Occurrence Handle10.1007/BF00485355
E.W. Adams (1974) ArticleTitleThe Logic of “almost all” Journal of Philosophical Logic 3 3–17 Occurrence Handle10.1007/BF00652068
E.W. Adams (1986) ArticleTitleContinuity and Idealizability of Approximate Generalizations Synthese 67 439–476 Occurrence Handle10.1007/BF00485943
E.W. Adams (1997) ArticleTitlePractical Possibilities Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 78 113–127
E.W. Adams W.Y. William (1987) ArticleTitlePurpose and Scientific Concept Formation British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 38 419–440
D. Bamber (2000) ArticleTitleEntailment with Near Surety of Scaled Assertions of High Probability Journal of Philosophical Logic 29 1–74 Occurrence Handle10.1023/A:1004650520609
I. Copi (1972) Introduction to Logic, Fourth Edition The Macmillan Company New York.
W. Feller (1954) An Introduction to Probability Theory and its Applications, Volume 1, Second Edition John Wiley and Sons New York.
N. Rescher (1964) Introduction to Logic St. Martin’s Press New York.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Adams, E.W. On A Proportionality Analysis of Syllogistic Private Reasoning. Synthese 146, 129–138 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-005-9078-5
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-005-9078-5