Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Social Vision: Functional Forecasting and the Integration of Compound Social Cues

  • Published:
Review of Philosophy and Psychology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

A Commentary to this article was published on 07 May 2015

A Commentary to this article was published on 07 May 2015

Abstract

For decades the study of social perception was largely compartmentalized by type of social cue: race, gender, emotion, eye gaze, body language, facial expression etc. This was partly due to good scientific practice (e.g., controlling for extraneous variability), and partly due to assumptions that each type of social cue was functionally distinct from others. Herein, we present a functional forecast approach to understanding compound social cue processing that emphasizes the importance of shared social affordances across various cues (see too Adams et al. In The science of social vision, ed. R.B. Adams Jr., N. Ambady, K. Nakayama, and S. Shimojo. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010b; Adams and Nelson In The handbook of social neuroscience, ed. J. Decety and J. Cacioppo. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011; Weisbuch and Adams Social and Personality Psychology Compass 6: 499–514, 2012). We review the traditional theories of emotion and face processing that argued for dissociable and noninteracting pathways (e.g., for specific emotional expressions, gaze, identity cues), as well as more recent evidence for combinatorial processing of social cues. We argue here that early, and presumably reflexive, visual integration of such cues is necessary for adaptive behavioral responding to others. In support of this claim, we review contemporary work that reveals a flexible visual system, one that readily incorporates meaningful contextual influences in even nonsocial visual processing, thereby establishing the functional and neuroanatomical bases necessary for compound social cue integration. Finally, we explicate three likely mechanisms driving such integration. Together, this work implicates a role for cognitive penetrability in visual perceptual abilities that have often been (and in some cases still are) ascribed to direct encapsulated perceptual processes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Please see this Slate article on how drivers of certain car makes are perceived:

    http://www.slate.com/articles/life/a_fine_whine/2013/07/bmw_drivers_and_cyclists_the_war_between_the_luxury_cars_and_bicycles.html)

References

  • Ackerman, J.M., J.R. Shapiro, S.L. Neuberg, D.T. Kenrick, D.V. Becker, V. Griskevicius, et al. 2006. They all look the same to me (unless they’re angry): from out-group homogeneity to out-group heterogeneity. Psychological Science 17: 836–840.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Adams Jr., R.B., and R.E. Kleck. 2003. Perceived gaze direction and the processing of facial displays of emotion. Psychological Science 14: 644–647.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Adams Jr., R.B., and R.E. Kleck. 2005. Effects of direct and averted gaze on the perception of facially communicated emotion. Emotion 5: 3–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Adams Jr., R.B., and A.J. Nelson. 2011. Intersecting identities and expressions: the compound nature of social perception (pp. 394–403). In The handbook of social neuroscience, ed. J. Decety and J. Cacioppo. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Adams Jr., R.B., H.L. Gordon, A.A. Baird, N. Ambady, and R.E. Kleck. 2003. Effects of gaze on amygdala sensitivity to anger and fear faces. Science 300: 1536.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Adams Jr., R.B., N. Ambady, C.N. Macrae, and R.E. Kleck. 2006. Emotional expressions forecast approach-avoidance behavior. Motivation and Emotion 30: 177–186.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Adams Jr., R.B., N. Ambady, K. Nakayama, and S. Shimojo (eds.). 2010a. The science of social vision. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Adams Jr., R.B., R.G. Franklin Jr., A.J. Nelson, and M.T. Stevenson. 2010b. Compound social cues in face processing (pp. 90–107). In The science of social vision, ed. R.B. Adams Jr., N. Ambady, K. Nakayama, and S. Shimojo. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Adams Jr., R.B., K. Pauker, and M. Weisbuch. 2010c. Looking the other way: the role of gaze direction in the cross-race memory effect. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 46: 478–481.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Adams, R.B., Jr., R.G. Franklin Jr., K. Kveraga, N. Ambady, R.E. Kleck, P.J. Whalen, N. Hadjikhani, and A.J. Nelson. 2012. Amygdala responses to averted versus direct gaze fear vary as a function of presentation speed. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience 7: 568–577.

  • Aguirre, G.K., J.A. Detre, D.C. Alsop, and M. D’Esposito. 1996. The parahippocampus subserves topographical learning in man. Cerebral Cortex 6: 823–829.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ambady, N., D. LaPlante, T. Nguyen, R. Rosenthal, and W. Levinson. 2002. Surgeon’s tone of voice: a clue to malpractice history. Surgery 132: 5–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aminoff, E., N. Gronau, and M. Bar. 2007. The parahippocampal cortex mediates spatial and nonspatial associations. Cerebral Cortex 17: 1493–1503.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bar, M., and E. Aminoff. 2003. Cortical analysis of visual context. Neuron 38: 347–358.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bar, M., E. Aminoff, and D.L. Schacter. 2008. Scenes unseen: the parahippocampal cortex intrinsically subserves contextual associations, not scenes or places per se. Journal of Neuroscience 28: 8539–8544.

  • Bar, M., K.S. Kassam, A.S. Ghuman, J. Boshyan, A.M. Schmid, A.M. Dale, M.S. Hamalainen, K. Marinkovic, D.L. Schacter, B.R. Rosen, and E. Halgren. 2006. Top-down facilitation of visual recognition. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 103: 449–454.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baron-Cohen, S. 1995. Theory of mind and face-processing: how do they interact in development and psychopathology. In Developmental psychopathology, vol. 1, ed. D. Cicchetti and D. Cohen, 343–356. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Becker, D.V., D.T. Kenrick, S.L. Neuberg, K.C. Blackwell, and D.M. Smith. 2007. The confounded nature of angry men and happy women. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 92: 179–190.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bernstein, M.J., S.G. Young, and K. Hugenberg. 2007. The cross-category effect: mere social categorization is sufficient to elicit an own-group bias in face recognition. Psychological Science 18: 706–712.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brodmann, K. (1909/2006). Localization in the cerebral cortex. Springer.

  • Brothers, L., and B. Ring. 1993. Mesial temporal neurons in the macaque monkey with responses selective for aspects of social stimuli. Behavioural Brain Research 57: 53–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bruce, V., and A. Young. 1986. Understanding face recognition. British Journal of Psychology 77: 305–327.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buckner, R., and F. Krienen. 2013. The evolution of distributed association networks in the human brain. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 17: 648–665.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buzsáki, G. 2006. Rhythms of the Brain. Oxford University Press.

  • Calder, A.J., and A.W. Young. 2005. Understanding the recognition of facial identity and facial expression. Nature Reviews Neuroscience 6: 641–651.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Calder, A.J., A.M. Burton, P. Miller, A.W. Young, and S. Akamatsu. 2001. A principal component analysis of facial expressions. Vision Research 41: 1179–1208.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chaumon, M., K. Kveraga, L.F. Barrett, and M. Bar. 2013. Visual predictions in the orbitofrontal cortex rely on associative content. Cerebral Cortex. doi:10.1093/cercor/bht146.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chiao, J.Y., R.B. Adams Jr., P.U. Tse, W.T. Lowenthal, J.A. Richeson, and N. Ambady. 2008. Knowing who’s boss: fMRI and ERP investigations of social dominance perception. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations 11: 201–214.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, L., et al. 2002. Language-specific tuning of visual cortex? Functional properties of the visual word form area. Brain 125: 1054–1069.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Darwin, C. (1872; 1965; 1998). The expression of the emotions in man and animals. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

  • Davidson, R.J., and K. Hugdahl (eds.). 1995. Brain asymmetry. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Gelder, B., and M. Tamietto. 2010. Faces, bodies, social vision as agent vision and social consciousness (pp. 51–74). In The science of social vision, ed. R.B. Adams, N. Ambady, K. Nakayama, and S. Shimojo. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Gelder, B., G. Pourtois, M. van Raamsdonk, J. Vroomen, and L. Weiskrantz. 2001. Unseen stimuli modulate conscious visual experience: evidence from inter-hemispheric summation. Neuroreport 12: 385–391.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de Gelder, B., J.S. Morris, and R.J. Dolan. 2005. Unconscious fear influences emotional awareness of faces and voices. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 102: 18682–18687.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Downing, P.E., Y. Jiang, M. Shuman, and N. Kanwisher. 2001. A cortical area selective for visual processing of the human body. Science 293: 2470–2473.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dunbar, R.I.M. 1998. The social brain hypothesis. Evolutionary Anthropology 6: 178–190.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Epstein, R., and N. Kanwisher. 1998. A cortical representation of the local visual environment. Nature 392: 598–601.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fodor, J.A. 1983. The modularity of mind. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, J.B., and N. Ambady. 2011. A dynamic interactive theory of person construal. Psychological Review 118: 247–279.

  • Freeman, J.B., N.O. Rule, R.B. Adams Jr., and N. Ambady. 2010. The neural basis of categorical face perception: graded representations of face gender in fusiform and orbitofrontal cortices. Cerebral Cortex 20: 1314–1322.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frischen, A., A.P. Bayliss, and S.P. Tipper. 2007. Gaze cueing of attention: visual attention, social cognition, and individual differences. Psychological Bulletin 133: 694–724.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Friston, K.J., L. Harrison, and W. Penny. 2003. Dynamic causal modelling. NeuroImage 19: 1273–1302.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ghuman, A.S., J.R. McDaniel, and A. Martin. 2010. Face adaptation without a face. Current Biology 20: 32–36.

  • Gibson, J.J. 1979. The ecological approach to visual perception. Boston: Houghton-Mifflin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gifford, R. 1991. Mapping nonverbal behavior on the interpersonal circle. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 61: 279–288.

  • Goodale, M.A., and A.D. Milner. 1992. Separate visual pathways for perception and action. Trends in Neuroscience 15(1): 20–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gregory, R.L. 1970. The intelligent eye. Weidenfeld and Nicolson, London.

  • Hadjikhani, N., K. Kveraga, P. Naik, and S.P. Ahlfors. 2009. Early (M170) activation of face-specific cortex by face-like objects. Neuroreport 20(4): 403–407.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haxby, J.V., E.A. Hoffman, and M.I. Gobbini. 2000. The distributed human neural system for face perception. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 4: 223–233.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hendry, S.H., and C. Reid. 2000. The koniocellular pathway in primate vision. Annual Review of Neuroscience 23: 127–153.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hess, U., R.B. Adams Jr., and R. Kleck. 2004. Facial appearance, gender, and emotion expression. Emotion 4: 378–388.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hess, U., R.B. Adams Jr., and R. Kleck. 2005. Who may frown and who should smile? Dominance, affiliation, and the display of happiness and anger. Cognition & Emotion 19: 515–536.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hess, U., R.B. Adams Jr., K. Grammer, and R.E. Kleck. 2009. Sex and emotion expression: are angry women more like men? Journal of Vision 9: 1–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hildebrandt, K.A., and H.E. Fitzgerald. 1981. Mothers’ responses to infant physical appearance. Infant Mental Health Journal 2: 56–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hubel, D.H., and T.N. Wiesel. 1959. Receptive fields of single neurones in the cat’s striate cortex. Journal of Physiology 148: 574–591.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hugenberg, K. 2005. Social categorization and the perception of facial affect: target race moderates the response latency advantage for happy faces. Emotion 5: 267–276.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Isbell, L.A. 2006. Snakes as agents of evolutionary change in primate brain. Journal of Human Evolution 51(1): 1–35. doi:10.1016/j.jhevol.2005.12.012.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jayakumar, J., R. Sujata, B. Dreher, P.R. Martin, and T.R. Vidyasagar. 2013. Multiple pathways carry signals from short-wavelength-sensitive (‘blue’) cones to the middle temporal area of the macaque. Journal of Physiology 591(1): 339–352.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones, B.C., L.M. DeBruine, J.C. Main, A.C. Little, L.L. Welling, D.R. Feinberg, and B.P. Tiddeman. 2010. Facial cues of dominance modulate the short-term gaze-cuing effect in human observers. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 277: 617–624.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaas, J. (2000) TITLE. In Cognitive Neuroscience, A reader. Ed. Gazzaniga.

  • Kanwisher, N. 2010. Functional specificity in the human brain: a window into the functional architecture of the mind. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 107: 11163–11170.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kanwisher, N.G., J. McDermott, and M.M. Chun. 1997. The fusiform face area: a module in human extrastriate cortex specialized for face perception. Journal of Neuroscience 17: 4302–4311.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keltner, D., P. Ekman, G.C. Gonzaga, and J. Beer. 2003. Facial expression of emotion. In Handbook of affective sciences, ed. R.J. Davidson, K.R. Scherer, and H.H. Goldsmith, 415–431. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knutson, B. 1996. Facial expressions of emotion influence interpersonal trait inferences. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior 20: 165–182.

  • Króliczak, G., P. Heard, M.A. Goodale, and R.L. Gregory. 2006. Dissociation of perception and action unmasked by the hollow-face illusion. Brain Research 1080: 9–16.

  • Kveraga, K., J. Boshyan, and M. Bar. 2007a. Magnocellular projections as the trigger of top-down facilitation in recognition. Journal of Neuroscience 27: 13232–13240.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kveraga, K., A.S. Ghuman, and M. Bar. 2007b. Top-down predictions in the cognitive brain. Brain and Cognition 65(2): 145–168.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kveraga, K., J. Boshyan, and M. Bar. 2009. The proactive brain: using memory-based predictions in visual recognition. In Object categorization: computer and human vision perspectives, ed. S. Dickinson, M. Tarr, A. Leonardis, and B. Schiele. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kveraga, K., A.S. Ghuman, K.S. Kassam, E. Aminoff, M.S. Hamalainen, M. Chaumon, et al. 2011. Early onset of neural synchronization in the contextual associations network. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 108(8): 3389–3394.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Le Gal, P.M., and V. Bruce. 2002. Evaluating the independence of sex and expression in judgments of faces. Perception and Psychophysics 2: 230–243.

  • Le Gal, P.M., and V. Bruce. 2002. Evaluating the independence of sex and expression in judgments of faces. Perception and Psychophysics 64: 230–243.

  • LeDoux, J.E. 1996. The emotional brain. New York: Simon & Schuster.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maclin, O.H., and R.S. Malpass. 2001. Racial categorization of faces: the ambiguous race face effect. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law 7: 98–118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maior, R.S., et al. 2011. Superior colliculus lesions impair threat responsiveness in infant capuchin monkeys. Neuroscience Letters 504(3): 257–260.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marsh, A.A., R.B. Adams Jr., and R.E. Kleck. 2005. Why do fear and anger look the way they do? Form and social function in facial expressions. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 31: 73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McKone, E., J.L. Brewer, S. MacPherson, G. Rhodes, and W.G. Hayward. 2007. Familiar other-race faces show normal holistic processing and are robust to perceptual stress. Perception 36: 224.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meeren, H.J.M., C.C.R.J. van Heijnsbergen, and B. de Gelder. 2005. Rapid perceptual integration of facial expression and emotional body language. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 102: 16518–16523.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Michel, C., B. Rossion, J. Han, C. Chung, and R. Caldara. 2006. Holistic processing is finely tuned for faces of one’s own race. Psychological Science 17: 608–615.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mogg, K., M. Garner, and B.P. Bradley. 2007. Anxiety and orienting of gaze to angry and fearful faces. Biological Psychology 76: 163–169.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morand, S., G. Thut, R. Grave de Peralta, S. Clarke, A. Khateb, T. Landis, and C.M. Michel. 2000. Electrophysiological evidence for fast visual processing through the human koniocellular pathway when stimuli move. Cerebral Cortex 10: 817–825.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morris, J.S., A. Öhman, and R.J. Dolan. 1998. Conscious and unconscious emotional learning in the human amygdala. Nature 393: 467–470.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nakayama, N. Vision going social (2010) (pp. xv-xxix). In The science of social vision, eds. R.B. Adams Jr., N. Ambady, K. Nakayama & S. Shimojo Oxford University Press.

  • Öhman, A. 2005. The role of the amygdala in human fear: automatic detection of threat. Psychoneuroendocrinology, 30: 953–958.

  • O’Toole, A.J., et al. 1998. The perception of face gender: the role of stimulus structure in recognition and classification. Memory & Cognition 26: 146–160.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pauker, K., N. Ambady, M. Weisbuch, S.R. Sommers, R.B. Adams Jr., and Z. Ivcevic. 2009. Not so black and white: memory for ambiguous group members. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 96: 795–810.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pessoa, L., and R. Adolphs. 2010. Emotion processing and the amygdala: from a “low road” to “many roads” of evaluating biological significance. Nature Reviews Neuroscience 11: 773–783.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peters, J., I. Daum, E. Gizewski, M. Forsting, and B. Suchan. 2009. Associations evoked during memory encoding recruit the context-network. Hippocampus 19: 141–151.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pineda, J.A., G. Sebestyen, and C. Nava. 1994. Face recognition as a function of social attention in non-human primates: an ERP study. Brain Research. Cognitive Brain Research 2: 1–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Redican, W.K. 1982. An evolutionary perspective on human facial displays. In Emotion in the human face, 2nd ed, ed. P. Ekman, 212–280. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richeson, J.A., A.R. Todd, S. Trawalter, and A.A. Baird. 2008. Eye-gaze direction modulates race-related amygdala activity. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations 11: 233–246.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rule, N.O., N. Ambady, R.B. Adams Jr., and C.N. Macrae. 2007. Us and them: memory advantages in perceptually ambiguous groups. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 14: 687–692.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sapir, E. 1927. Speech as a personality trait. American Journal of Sociology 32: 892–905.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schaefer, E.S., and R. Plutchik. 1966. Interrelationships of emotions, traits, and diagnostic constructs. Psychological Reports 18: 399–410.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shepherd, S.V., R.O. Deaner, and M.L. Platt. 2006. Social status gates social attention in monkeys. Current Biology 16: R119–R120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shriver, E., S. Young, K. Hugenberg, M. Bernstein, and J. Lanter. 2008. Class, race, and the face: social context modulates the cross-race effect in face recognition. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 34: 260–278.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Siegel, S. 2011. Cognitive penetrability and perceptual justification. Noûs 46: 201–222.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tamietto, M., and B. de Gelder. 2010. Neural bases of the non-conscious perception of emotional signals. Nature Reviews Neuroscience 11: 697–709.

  • Tamietto, M., L. Weiskrantz, G. Geminiani, and B. de Gelder (2007). The Medium and the Message: Non-conscious processing of emotions from facial expressions and body language in blindsight. Paper presented at the Cognitive Neuroscience Society Annual Meeting, New York, NY.

  • Tanaka, J.W., M. Kiefer, and C.M. Bukach. 2004. A holistic account of the own-race effect in face recognition: evidence from a cross-cultural study. Cognition 93: B1–B9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Townsend, J.T., and M.J. Wenger. 2004. A theory of interactive parallel processing: new capacity measures and predictions for a response time inequality series. Psychological Review 111: 1003–1035.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trawalter, S., A. Todd, A.A. Baird, and J.A. Richeson. 2008. Attending to threat: race-based patterns of selective attention. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 44: 1322–1327.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tudusciuc, O., and A. Nieder. 2010. Comparison of length judgments and the Müller-Lyer illusion in monkeys and humans. Experimental Brain Research 207: 221–231.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turk, D.J., T.C. Handy, and M.S. Gazzaniga. 2005. Can perceptual expertise account for the own-race bias in face recognition? A split-brain study. Cognitive Neuropsychology 22: 877–883.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vuilleumier, P., J.L. Armony, J. Driver, and R.J. Dolan. 2003. Distinct spatial frequency sensitivities for processing faces and emotional expressions. Nature Neuroscience 6: 624–631.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weisbuch, M., and R.B. Adams Jr. 2012. The functional forecast model of emotional expression processing. Social and Personality Psychology Compass 6: 499–514.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weisbuch, M., K. Pauker, S. Lamer, and R.B. Adams, Jr. (under review). Social Stratification and Reflexive Gaze-Following.

  • Wiesenfeld, A.R., and R. Klorman. 1978. The mother’s psychophysiological reactions to contrasting affective expressions by her own and an unfamiliar infant. Developmental Psychology 14(3): 294–304.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wiggins, J.S., and R. Broughton. 1991. A geometric taxonomy of personality scales. European Journal of Personality 5: 343–365.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xu, X., J.M. Ichida, J.D. Allison, J.D. Boyd, and A.B. Bonds. 2001. A comparison of koniocellular, magnocellular and parvocellular receptive field properties in the lateral geniculate nucleus of the owl monkey (Aotus trivirgatus). Journal of Physiology 531: 203–218.

  • Zebrowitz. 1997. Reading faces: window to the soul? Boulder: Westview Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zebrowitz, L., M. Kikuchi, and J.M. Fellous. 2010. Facial resemblance to emotions: group differences, impression effects, and race stereotypes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 98: 175–189.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Reginald B. Adams Jr..

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Adams, R.B., Kveraga, K. Social Vision: Functional Forecasting and the Integration of Compound Social Cues. Rev.Phil.Psych. 6, 591–610 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13164-015-0256-1

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13164-015-0256-1

Keywords

Navigation