Skip to main content
Log in

What can the history of AI learn from the history of science?

  • Open Forum
  • Published:
AI & SOCIETY Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

There have been few attempts, so far, to document the history of artificial intelligence. It is argued that the “historical sociology of scientific knowledge” can provide a broad historiographical approach for the history of AI, particularly as it has proved fruitful within the history of science in recent years. The article shows how the sociology of knowledge can inform and enrich four types of project within the history of AI; organizational history; AI viewed as technology; AI viewed as cognitive science and historical biography. In the latter area the historical treatments of Darwin and Turing are compared to warn against the pitfalls of “rational reconstructions” of the past.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  • Arnold, E. (1988).A Review of the Alvey Intelligent Knowledge-Based Systems (IKBS) Programme. Science Policy Research Unit, University of Sussex, Brighton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barnes, B. (1974).Scientific Knowledge and Sociological Theory. Routledge & Kegan Paul, London and Boston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barnes, B. (1977).Interests and the Growth of Knowledge. Routledge & Kegan Paul, London, Henley and Boston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barnes, B. (1982).T. S. Kuhn and Social Science. Macmillan, London and Basingstoke.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berman, M. (1978).Social Change and Scientific Organisations: the Royal Institution, 1799–1844. Heinemann, London etc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bloomfield, B. P. (ed.) (1987).The Question of Artificial Intelligence: Philosophical and Sociological Perspectives. Croom Helm, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bloomfield, B. P. (1988). Expert systems and human knowledge: a view from the sociology of science.AI & Society, 2, 17–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bloor, D. (1976).Knowledge and Social Imagery. Routledge & Kegan Paul, London, Henley and Boston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bloor, D. (1983).Wittgenstein: A Social Theory of Knowledge. Macmillan, London and Basingstoke.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruce, M. (1988). New product development strategies of suppliers of emerging technologies — a case study of expert systems.Journal of Marketing Management, 3, no. 3.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruce, M. and A. Adam (1989). Expert systems and women's lives: a technology assessment.Futures: the Journal of Forecasting and Planning, 21, 480–497.

    Google Scholar 

  • Charniak, E. and D. McDermott (1985).Introduction to Artificial Intelligence. Addison-Wesley, Reading, Massachusetts.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collins, H. M.et al. (1985). Where's the expertise? Expert systems as a medium of knowledge transfer. In Merry (ed.)Expert Systems 85. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collins, H. M. (1987). Expert systems and the science of knowledge. In Bijker, Hughes and Pinch (eds)The Social Construction of Technological Systems: New Directions in the Sociology of Technology. MIT Press, Cambridge Massachusetts.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collins, H. M. (1988). Public experiments and displays of virtuosity: the core-set revisited.Social Studies of Science, 18, 725–748.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooley, M. (1987). Human centred systems: an urgent problem for systems designers.AI & Society, 1, 37–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dreyfus, H. L. and S. E. Dreyfus (1986).Mind Over Machine: The Power of Human Intuition and Expertise in the Era of the Computer. Free Press/Macmillan, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dreyful, D. (1972).What Computers Can't Do: A Critique of Artificial Reason. Harper and Row, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elton, G. R. (1984).The Practice of History. Fontana Paperbacks, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ennals, R. (1987). Socially useful artificial intelligence.AI & Society, 1, 5–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feigenbaum, E. A. and J. Feldman (1963).Computers and Thought. McGraw-Hill, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fleck, J. (1978).The structure and development of artificial intelligence: a case study in the sociology of science. Unpublished M.Sc. dissertation, University of Manchester.

  • Fleck, J. (1987). Development and establishment in artificial intelligence. In Bloomfield (ed.)The Question of Artificial Intelligence. Croom Helm, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Habermas, J. (1971).Toward a Rational Society. Heinemann, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hodges, A. (1983).Alan Turing The Enigma of Intelligence. Burnett Books/Hutchinson, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jahoda, M., K. Guy and B. Evans (1988).Expert Systems Present State and future trends: Impact on employment and skill requirements (Literature review). International Labour Office, Geneva.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laudan, L. (1977).Progress and Its Problems: Towards a Theory of Scientific Growth. Routledge & Kegan Paul, London and Henley.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacKenzie, D. and J. Wajcman (1985).The Social Shaping of Technology. Open University Press, Milton Keynes and Philadelphia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marcuse, H. (1968).One Dimensional Man: the Ideology of Industrial Society. Sphere.

  • Morrell, J. B. and A. Thackray (1981).Gentleman of Science. Clarendon, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Narayanan, A. (1988).On Being a Machine. Volume 1: Formal Aspects of Artificial Intelligence. Ellis Horwood, Chichester.

    Google Scholar 

  • Popper, K. (1959).Conjectures and Refutations. Routledge & Kegan Paul, London and Henley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pratt, V. (1987).Thinking Machines: The Evolution of Artificial Intelligence. Basil Blackwell, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shapin, S. (1975). Phrenological knowledge and the social structure of nineteenth century Edinburgh.Annals of Science, 32, 219–243.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shapin, S. (1982). History of science and its sociological reconstructions.History of Science, xx, 157–211.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shapin, S. and B. Barnes (1979). Darwin and social Darwinism: purity and history. In Barnes and Shapin (eds)Natural Order: Historical Studies of Scientific Culture. Sage, London and Beverly Hills.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simons, G. (1988).Evolution of the Intelligent Machine: A Popular History of AI. NCC Publications, Manchester.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turing, A. M. (1950). Computing machinery and intelligence.Mind, LIX, 433–460.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wynne, B. (1988). Unruly technology: practical rules, impractical discourses and public understanding.Social Studies of Science, 18, 147–167.

    Google Scholar 

  • Young, R. M. (1985).Darwin's Metaphor: Nature's Place in Victorian Culture. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Adam, A.E. What can the history of AI learn from the history of science?. AI & Soc 4, 232–241 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01889942

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01889942

Keywords

Navigation