Skip to main content
Log in

Teleogy and genes

  • Published:
Biology and Philosophy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

My aim in this paper is to quickly sketch a teleological approach to the problem of isolating the impact of genes on phenotypic characters. I begin by arguing that it is a mistake to think that there will be only one analysis of genetic input suitable for all theoretical interests. My principle focus is Richard Dawkins' argument for genic selectionism. I argue that a teleological analysis of genetic input is what Dawkins requires to establish the right kind of mapping of gene onto phenotype. This comes at a certain cost, however. Accepting the analysis will threaten Dawkins' claims about the teleogogical priority of gene over phenotype.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Cronin, H.: 1992,The Ant and the Peacock, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dawkins, R.: 1982, ‘Replicators and Vehicle’, in King's College Sociolobiology Group (eds.),Current Problems in Sociobiology, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dawkins, R.: 1989,The Extended Phenotype, Oxford University Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dawkins, R.: 1990,The Selfish Gene, Oxford University Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doolittle, W. and Sapienza, C.: 1980, ‘Selfish Genes: The Phenotypic Paradigm, and Genome Evolution’,Nature 284, 601–603.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gould, S.: 1987,The Panda's Thumb, Penguin, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kevles, D. and Hood, L.: 1992,The Code of Codes: Scientific and Social Issues in the Human Genome Project, Harvard University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maynard Smith, J.: 1987, ‘How to Model Evolution’, in Dupre, J. (ed.),The Latest on the Best: Essays on Evolution and Optimality, Bradford Books/MIT Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Millikan, R.: 1989, ‘In Defence of Proper Functions’,Philosophy of Science 56, 288–302.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neander, K.: 1991, ‘Functions as Selected Effects: the Conceptual Analyst's Defence’,Philosophy of Science 58, 168–184.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sterelny, K. and Kitcher, P.: 1988, ‘The Return of the Gene’,Journal of Philosophy 85, 339–361.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Agar, N. Teleogy and genes. Biol Philos 11, 289–300 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00128783

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00128783

Key words

Navigation