Abstract
For many years, biology was largely descriptive (“natural history”), but with its emergence as a scientific discipline in its own right, a reductionist approach began, which has failed to be matched by adequate understanding of function of cells, organisms and species as whole entities. Every effort was made to “explain” biological phenomena in physico-chemical terms.
It is argued that there is and always has been a clear distinction between life sciences and physical sciences, explicit in the use of the word biology. If this distinction is real, it implies that biological phenomena can never be entirely satisfactorily explained in terms of extant physicochemical laws. One notable manifestation of this is that living organisms appear to -- actually do -- behave in purposeful ways, and the inanimate universe does not. While this fundamental difference continues to be suppressed, the “purposiveness” (or teleology) which pervades biology remains anathema to almost all scientists (including most biologists) even to the present day. We argue here that it can, however, become a perfectly tenable position when the Theory of Natural Selection is accepted as the main foundation, the essential tenet, of biology that distinguishes it from the realm of physical sciences. In accepting this position, it remains quite legitimate to expect that in many but not all circumstances, extant physical laws (and presumably others still to be discovered) are in no way breached by biological systems, which cannot be otherwise since all organisms are composed of physical material.
Similar content being viewed by others
REFERENCES
Whitehead, A.N.: 1929, The Function of Reason. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1929.
Powers, M.A. and D.J. Forbes: 1994, Cytosolic Factors in Nuclear Transport; What's Importin? Cell 79: 931-934.
Monod, J.: 1970, Chance and Necessity: An Essay in the Natural Philosophy of Modern Biology. London: Collins.
Mayr, E.: 1982, The Growth of Biological Thought; Diversity, Evolution and Inheritance. Cambridge, MA: The Belknap Press/Harvard University Press.
Ruse, M.: 1973, The Philosophy of Biology. London: Hutchison.
Nagel, E., S. Bronberger and A. Grunbaum: 1971, Observation and Theory in Science. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins Press.
Hull, D.: 1974, Philosophy of Biological Science. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Agutter, P.S. and D.N. Wheatley: 1997, In Defence of Teleological Arguments in Biology: A Darwinian Legacy. Biologist 44: 432.
Loeb, J.: 1912, The Mechanistic Conception of Life. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
Young, J.Z.: 1950, Doubt and Certainty in Science. London: Oxford University Press.
Canguilem, G.: 1989, The Normal and the Pathological. New York: Zone Books.
Katchalsky, A.: 1965, Non-Equilibrium Thermodynamics in Biophysics. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Wheatley, D.N. and P.S. Agutter: 1996, Historical Aspects of the Origins of Diffusion Theory in 19th-Century Mechanistic Materialism. Perspect. Biol. Med. 40: 139-156.
Bohr, C.: 1891, Sur la respiration pulmonaire. Skand. Archiv. Physiol. 2: 236-268.
Haldane, J.S.: 1935, The Philosophy of a Biologist. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Zinman, J.: 1978, Reliable Knowledge. Canto: Cambridge University Press.
Medawar, P.: 1996, The Strange Case of the Spotted Mice and Other Classic Essays on Science, Chapter 2. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Dobzhansky, T.: 1937, Genetics and the Origin of Species. New York: Columbia University Press.
Smolin, L.: 1997, The Life of the Cosmos. London: Oxford University Press.
Dawkins, R.: 1986, The Blind Watchmaker. Harlow: Longman Scientific and Technical.
Gould, S.J.: 1990, Wonderful Life: The Burgess Shale and the Nature of History. London: Hutchison Radius.
Hunt, T., S. Prentis and J. Tooze: 1983, DNA Makes RNA Makes Protein. Amsterdam: Elsevier Biomedical Press.
Ledje, C. and U. Arnason: 1996, Phylogenetic Relationships Within Caniform Carnivores Based on Analyses of the Mitchondrial 12S rRNA Gene. J. Molec. Evol. 43: 641-649.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Agutter, P.S., Wheatley, D.N. Foundations of Biology: On the Problem of “Purpose” in Biology in Relation to Our Acceptance of the Darwinian Theory of Natural Selection. Foundations of Science 4, 3–23 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009634718370
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009634718370