Abstract
Objectives
To compare the practices of local research ethics committees and the time they take to obtain ethical approval for a multi-centre study.Design
A retrospective analysis of outcome of applications for a multi-centre study to local research ethics committees.Setting
Thirty-six local research ethics committees covering 38 district health authorities in England.Main measures
Response of chairmen and women, the time required to obtain approval, and questions asked in application forms.Results
We received replies from all 36 chairmen contacted: four (11%) granted their approval, and 32 (89%) required our proposal to be considered by their local research ethics committee. Three committees asked us to attend their meetings. The application was approved by all 36 local research ethics committees but the time to obtain ethical approval varied between six to 208 days. One third of the committees did not approve the project within three months, and three took longer than six months. There was considerable variation in the issues raised by local research ethics committees and none conformed exactly to the Royal College of Physicians' guidelines.Conclusion
Obtaining ethical approval for a multi-centre study is time-consuming. There is much diversity in the practice of local research ethics committees. Our data support the recommendation for a central or regional review body of multi-centre studies which will be acceptable to all local research ethics committees.Free full text
Delays and diversity in the practice of local research ethics committees.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: To compare the practices of local research ethics committees and the time they take to obtain ethical approval for a multi-centre study. DESIGN: A retrospective analysis of outcome of applications for a multi-centre study to local research ethics committees. SETTING: Thirty-six local research ethics committees covering 38 district health authorities in England. MAIN MEASURES: Response of chairmen and women, the time required to obtain approval, and questions asked in application forms. RESULTS: We received replies from all 36 chairmen contacted: four (11%) granted their approval, and 32 (89%) required our proposal to be considered by their local research ethics committee. Three committees asked us to attend their meetings. The application was approved by all 36 local research ethics committees but the time to obtain ethical approval varied between six to 208 days. One third of the committees did not approve the project within three months, and three took longer than six months. There was considerable variation in the issues raised by local research ethics committees and none conformed exactly to the Royal College of Physicians' guidelines. CONCLUSION: Obtaining ethical approval for a multi-centre study is time-consuming. There is much diversity in the practice of local research ethics committees. Our data support the recommendation for a central or regional review body of multi-centre studies which will be acceptable to all local research ethics committees.
Full text
Full text is available as a scanned copy of the original print version. Get a printable copy (PDF file) of the complete article (678K), or click on a page image below to browse page by page. Links to PubMed are also available for Selected References.
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Diamond AL, Laurence DR. Compensation and drug trials. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed) 1983 Sep 3;287(6393):675–677. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
- Marshall Tim, Moodie Peter. Scrutinising research ethics committees. BMJ. 1988 Sep 24;297(6651):753–753. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
- Timmis AD, Fowler MB, Chamberlain DA. Comparison of haemodynamic responses to dopamine and salbutamol in severe cardiogenic shock complicating acute myocardial infarction. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed) 1981 Jan 3;282(6257):7–9. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
- Gilbert C, Fulford KW, Parker C. Diversity in the practice of district ethics committees. BMJ. 1989 Dec 9;299(6713):1437–1439. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
- Moran J. Local research ethics committees. Report of the 2nd National Conference. J R Coll Physicians Lond. 1992 Oct;26(4):423–431. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
- Berry TJ, Ades TE, Peckham CS. Too many ethical committees. BMJ. 1990 Dec 1;301(6763):1274–1274. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
- Hotopf M, Wessely S, Noah N. Are ethical committees reliable? J R Soc Med. 1995 Jan;88(1):31–33. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
Articles from Journal of Medical Ethics are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group
Full text links
Read article at publisher's site: https://doi.org/10.1136/jme.22.5.263
Read article for free, from open access legal sources, via Unpaywall:
https://jme.bmj.com/content/medethics/22/5/263.full.pdf
Citations & impact
Impact metrics
Citations of article over time
Article citations
Understanding Constraints and Enablers of Turnaround Time for Ethics Review: The Case of Institutional Review Boards in Tanzania.
J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics, 16(5):514-524, 28 Jun 2021
Cited by: 2 articles | PMID: 34180729 | PMCID: PMC8530844
Using evidence when planning for trial recruitment: An international perspective from time-poor trialists.
PLoS One, 14(12):e0226081, 10 Dec 2019
Cited by: 3 articles | PMID: 31821373 | PMCID: PMC6903711
Huge variation in obtaining ethical permission for a non-interventional observational study in Europe.
BMC Med Ethics, 20(1):39, 03 Jun 2019
Cited by: 17 articles | PMID: 31159853 | PMCID: PMC6547492
Research approvals iceberg: how a 'low-key' study in England needed 89 professionals to approve it and how we can do better.
BMC Med Ethics, 20(1):7, 25 Jan 2019
Cited by: 11 articles | PMID: 30678668 | PMCID: PMC6346542
Reliance agreements and single IRB review of multisite research: Concerns of IRB members and staff.
AJOB Empir Bioeth, 9(3):164-172, 01 Jul 2018
Cited by: 12 articles | PMID: 30285561 | PMCID: PMC6309766
Review Free full text in Europe PMC
Go to all (36) article citations
Similar Articles
To arrive at the top five similar articles we use a word-weighted algorithm to compare words from the Title and Abstract of each citation.
Research ethics committees at work: the experience of one multi-location study.
J Med Ethics, 22(6):352-355, 01 Dec 1996
Cited by: 13 articles | PMID: 8961122 | PMCID: PMC1377119
Ethical review of multi-centre research: a survey of local research ethics committees in the south Thames region.
J R Coll Physicians Lond, 32(3):238-241, 01 May 1998
Cited by: 6 articles | PMID: 9670151 | PMCID: PMC9663055
The new system of review by multicentre research ethics committees: prospective study.
BMJ, 320(7243):1179-1182, 01 Apr 2000
Cited by: 55 articles | PMID: 10784541 | PMCID: PMC32260
Meeting the challenges facing research ethics committees: some practical suggestions.
BMJ, 316(7124):58-61, 01 Jan 1998
Cited by: 23 articles | PMID: 9451273 | PMCID: PMC2665361
Review Free full text in Europe PMC
Stating the case for nursing research ethics committees: a discussion paper.
Nurse Educ Today, 18(2):133-137, 01 Feb 1998
Cited by: 4 articles | PMID: 9592512
Review