References
Branting, K. L. 1993. A reduction-graph model of ratio decidendi. In proceedings of The Fourth International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law, pp. 40–49. ACM Press, New York.
David, R. 1985. Major Legal Systems in the World Today: an Introduction to the Comparative Study of Law. Stevens, London.
Dworkin, R. 1977. Taking Rights Seriously. Gerald Duckworth & Co., London.
Hart, H. L. A. 1961. The Concept of Law. Oxford University Press, London.
Indurkhya, B. 1997. On modeling creativity in legal reasoning. In proceedings of The Sixth International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law, pp. 180–189. ACM Press, New York.
Kennedy, D. 1986. Freedom and constraint in adjudication: a critical phenomenology. Journal of Legal Education 36, 518.
Levi, E. H. 1949. An Introduction to Legal Reasoning. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
MacCormick, N. 1978. Legal Reasoning and Legal Theory. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
Rissland, E. L., Skalak, D. B. & Friedman, M. T. 1993. BankXX: A program to generate argument through case-base search. In proceedings of The Fourth International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law, pp. 117–124. ACM Press, New York.
Singer, J. W. 1984. The player and the cards: nihilism and legal theory. Yale Law Journal 94, 1.
Stone, J. 1964. Legal System and Lawyer's Reasonings. Stevens & Sons Limited, London.
Sunstein, C. R. 1993. On analogical reasoning. Harvard Law Review 106, 741.
Wald, P. M. 1995. The rhetoric of results and the results of rhetoric: judicial writings. University of Chicago Law Review 62, 1371.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Aikenhead, M. D. Neil MacCormick and Robert S. Summers (eds.) Interpreting Precedents: a comparative study.. Artificial Intelligence and Law 8, 283–288 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008347201300
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008347201300