Skip to main content
Log in

Curry's paradox in contractionless constructive logic

  • Published:
Journal of Philosophical Logic Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We propose contractionless constructive logic which is obtained from Nelson's constructive logic by deleting contractions. We discuss the consistency of a naive set theory based on the proposed logic in relation to Curry's paradox. The philosophical significance of contractionless constructive logic is also argued in comparison with Fitch's and Prawitz's systems.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Akama, S. (1988). On the proof method for constructive falsity, Zeitschrift für mathematische Logik und Grundlagen der Mathematik 34, 385–392.

    Google Scholar 

  • Akama, S. (1989). Constructive Falsity: Foundations and Their Applications to Computer Science. Ph.D. Thesis, Department of Administration Engineering, Keio University, Yokohama, Japan.

  • Almukdad, A. and Nelson, D. (1984). Constructible falsity and inexact predicates. Journal of Symbolic Logic 49, 231–233.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, A. R. (1975). Fitch on consistency, in A. R. Anderson, R. B. Marcus and R. M. Martin (eds), The Logical Enterprise, 123–141. Yale University Press, New Haven.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brady, R. T. (1983). The simple consistency of a set theory based on the logic CSQ, Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 24, 431–449.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bunder, M. (1985). BCK-predicate logic as a foundation of multiset theory. University of Wollongong.

  • Fitch, F. B. (1952). Symbolic Logic. Ronald Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Girard, J.-Y. (1987). Linear logic, Theoretical Computer Science 50, 1–102.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Kleene, S. C. (1952). Introduction to Metamathematics. North-Holland, Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Myhill, J. (1984). Paradoxes, Synthese 60, 129–143.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, D. (1949). Constructible falsity, Journal of Symbolic Logic 14, 16–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ono, H. and Komori, Y. (1985). Logics without the contraction rule. Journal of Symbolic Logic 50, 169–201.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prawitz, D. (1965). Natural Deduction: A Proof-Theoretical Study. Almqvist and Wiksell, Stockholm.

    Google Scholar 

  • Priest, G. (1987). In Contradiction. Martinus Nijhoff, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Restall, G. (1993). How to be really contraction free, Studia Logica 52, 381–391.

    Google Scholar 

  • Routley, R. (1974). Semantical analyses of propositional systems of Fitch and Nelson, Studia Logica 33, 283–298.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wansing, H. (1993). The Logic of Information Structures. Springer, Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  • White, R. (1979). The consistency of the axiom of comprehension in the infinite valued predicate logic of Lukasiewicz., Journal of Philosophical Logic 8, 509–534.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Akama, S. Curry's paradox in contractionless constructive logic. J Philos Logic 25, 135–150 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00247001

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00247001

Key words

Navigation