Skip to main content
Log in

The Foundations of Modern Organic Chemistry: The Rise of the Highes and Ingold Theory from 1930–1942

  • Published:
Foundations of Chemistry Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The foundations of modern organic chemistry were laid by the seminal work of Hughes and Ingold. The rise from being an interesting alternative hypothesis in 1933 to being the leading theory (outside the USA) in 1942 was achieved by a multiplicity of methods. This include:the construction of a new scientific notation, the rationalisation of some seemingly contradictory reported data, the refutation of the experimental work of one of their persistent critics, the use of conceptual arguments and also the achievement of a score of successful predictions which exceeded the score of unsuccessful predictions. Within the USA it was felt that the Hughes/Ingold system, whilst representing a considerable advance, had achieved spectacular success in spite ofits attractively simple basic assumptions, and represented merely an interim stage on the way towards a more comprehensive theory. However,the flexible, simple notation was adopted without modification, leading to a change in the way practitioners of synthetic organic chemistry were, and still are, trained to think.

In a conclusion the author claims that this historical episode does not lend any support to the philosophical position of Thomas Kuhn.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  • F.M. Akeroyd. Conceptual Aspects of Theory Appraisal: Some Biochemical Examples. Hyle 3: 95–102, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  • J.W. Baker. Electronic Theories of Organic Chemistry: An Introductory Approach. Oxford, University Press, 1958.

    Google Scholar 

  • R.D. Brown. Kinked Molecules. Chemistry in Britain 23: 1189–1192, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  • P. Duhem (1905). The Aim and Structure of Physical Theory, English edition. Edited by P. Weiner, London, Atheneum, pp. 180, 183, 1962.

    Google Scholar 

  • P.K. Feyerabend. Consolations for the Specialist. In: I. Lakatos and A. Musgrave (Eds.), Criticism and the Growth of Knowledge, pp. 212–213. Cambridge University Press, 1970.

  • E.S. Gould. Mechanism and Structure in Organic Chemistry, p. 1. NewYork,NY: Holt, Rinehart & Winston, 1959.

    Google Scholar 

  • R. Guthrie and W.P. Jencks. IUPAC Recommendations for Representations of Reaction Mechanisms. Accounts of Chemical Research 22: 343–349, 1989.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • P. Hoyningen-Huene. Reconstructing Scientific Revolutions: T. S. Kuhn's Philosophy of Science. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  • E.D. Hughes and C.K. Ingold. A Series of 16 Consecutive Papers on Elimination Reactions and Nucleophilic Substitution. Journal of the Chemical Society: 899–1029, 1940.

  • W.P. Jencks. How Does a Reaction Choose its Mechanism? Chemical Society Reviews 10: 345–375, 1981.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • I. Lakatos. History of Science and its Rational Reconstructions. PSA: 91–108, 1970.

  • L. Laudan. A Problem Solving Approach to Scientific Progress. In: I. Hacking (Ed.), Scientific Revolutions, pp. 144–155. Oxford University Press, 1981.

  • H.M. Leicester. Historical Background to Chemistry, p. 145. New York, Dover Edition 1971, 1956.

  • J. March. Advanced Organic Chemistry, 4th edition, pp. 293–300, 1992.

  • K.R. Popper. Logic of Scientific Discovery. London: Hutchinson, 1959.

    Google Scholar 

  • K.R. Popper. Unended Quest. Fontana Paperbacks,revised ed. 1982. p. 229, n. 242, 1974.

  • W.v.O. Quine. Two Dogmas of Empiricism. In: From a Logical Point of View, 2nd revised edition. Harper, 1961, pp. 20–46, 1951.

  • L.A. Whitt. Conceptual Dimensions of Theory Appraisal. Studies in the History and Philosophy of Science 19: 517–529, 1989.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • S. Winstein. Solvolysis of tert-butyl chloride. Journal of the American Chemical Society 61: 1635–1639, 1939.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • J. Worrall. Revolution in Permanence. In: A. O'Hear (Ed.), Karl Popper: Philosophy and Problems, pp. 75–102. Cambridge University Press, 1995.

  • E. Zahar. The Problem of the Empirical Basis. In: A. O'Hear (Ed.), Karl Popper: Philosophy and Problems, pp. 45–74. Cambridge University Press, 1995.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Akeroyd, F.M. The Foundations of Modern Organic Chemistry: The Rise of the Highes and Ingold Theory from 1930–1942. Foundations of Chemistry 2, 99–125 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009942227721

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009942227721

Keywords

Navigation