Skip to main content
Log in

Dissecting Intentionality in the Lab: Meinong’s Theory

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Axiomathes Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Besides presenting a phenomenological-experimental analysis of consciousness, Meinong challenged one of the major indisputable axioms of current scientific research, i.e. that perception in awareness has to be veridical on the stimulus. Meinong’s analysis of consciousness, which he conducted through a kind of dissection of its structures from a systematic and an experimental viewpoint, offers relevant insights to contemporary consciousness studies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. This is partly due to its revival during some decades of the last century in logic and analytic philosophy (Bergmann 1967; Chisholm 1960; Grossmann 1974; Haller 1966; Hochberg 2005; Jacquette 2001; Lambert 1983; Parsons 1980; Routley 1981; Simons 1995; Zalta 1983, 1988), as well as the theme of assumptions (Meinong 1910/1983), a development of Brentano’s tripartite classification of psychic phenomena (Brentano 1874/1995).

  2. I distinguish between intentional references (intentionale Beziehungen) and intentionality because, properly speaking, Brentano does not have a theory of intentionality, like Husserl’s for example (Schuhmann 1993).

  3. i.e. the different constitutive parts of an act of seeing: for example, the operation of seeing and its duration, the mental content, and the object of seeing.

  4. These concern the relation between the act and itself, and between the act and its correlate (such as seeing and seen, presenting and presented).

  5. By Gegenstand in German is meant ‘standing against’ or ‘confronting’, as objects are supposed to confront and present themselves to consciousness.

  6. Plurivocity is the perceptual shifting between different appearances, as in the Necker cube, or in a series of regularly aligned points that can be seen as horizontal lines or vertical columns, etc.

  7. In other words, whether some phases of development are more salient (auffällig) than others (Ameseder 1904; Benussi 1913; Husserl 1966/1991).

  8. The dispute regarded the explanation of apparent movement, such as the tachistoscopic presentation of the Müller-Lyer illusion. Benussi maintained that the cause was the diversity of positions assumed by the figure in the individual distinct phases of the process. Koffka, instead, believed that the vision of movement was a unitary phenomenon, not an aggregate or sum of parts: hence, he maintained, even if the phases presented are physically distinct, they are seen as a unitary, clearly structured complex (Koffka and Kenkel 1913).

  9. Psychological elementism conceives mental processes as composed of or derived from simple elements.

  10. The idea that phenomenology describes but neurophysiology explains is still widespread in perception studies (Spillmann 2009).

  11. Consider Ryle’s description of Meinong as the “supreme multiplier in the history of philosophy” (Ryle 1933, 44; see also Findlay 1963, Preface; Routley 1980. Criticism in Jacquette 1996).

  12. Subjective space is the anisotropic experienced space of visual appearance comprising illusions, distortions, apparent size of shapes, apparent motion; etc.; subjective time is the qualitative experience of duration.

  13. Temporal dislocations are acoustic phenomena like those of trills in music (see Wundt 1902; Rubin 1949).

  14. Objectives are not coincident with states of affairs (Sachverhälte): states of affairs connote factuality in ordinary language (Meinong 1910/1983; Rollinger 1999). Among the Meinongians, it was Witasek who stressed that presentations contain a moment of belief, of conviction (Witasek 1910, 7).

  15. Non-intuitive apprehensions are, for example, the apprehension of arbitrarily large times which implies the assumption of a relationship between two temporal instant-like ‘points’. The same happens when we think of one point lying 10 km away from another, or of one sound which is 10 octaves higher than another.

  16. Assumptions should not be confused with Bayesian priors of the inferential and probabilistic models in perception. In such approaches the entire informational content of the stimulus/mental state becomes a set of measures, and there is no semantic distinction between those assigned to the stimulus and those assigned to the mental state (Vishwanath 2005; Albertazzi et al. 2010). For example, depth, distance, direction in perceptual space, are all considered the same informational constructs as depth, distance, direction in some objective external world.

  17. Rensink, for example, found almost all the five prototypical durations identified by Benussi in his experiments on the present and its fringes (Benussi 1913; Calabresi 1930. See Albertazzi 1999, 2011). There are five of these durations, and they relate to qualitatively different situations. Benussi defined them as “absolute” impressions of durations, because their determination, according to Benussi, does not derive from the comparison with other presentations. In Meinongian terms they are neither judgments nor objectives. They are: very short durations (from 90 to 234–252 ms); short durations (from 234–252 to 585–630 ms); indeterminate durations (from 585–630 to 1,080–1,170 ms); long durations (from 1080–1170 to 2,070 ms); extremely long durations (≥2,070 ms). These durations constitute the present and its fringes.

  18. The qualitative level of reality concerns appearances, consisting of perceived primary qualities, secondary and tertiary qualities, and their Gestalt organization in perceptual wholes (Albertazzi 2013).

  19. Such as plurivocity, illusory perception, stereokinesis, etc.

References

  • Albertazzi L (1999) The time of presentness. A chapter in positivistic and descriptive psychology. Axiomathes 10:49–74

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Albertazzi L (2001a) The legacy of the Graz psychologists. In: Albertazzi L, Jacquette D, Poli R (eds) The school of Alexius Meinong. Asghate, Aldershot, pp 321–345

    Google Scholar 

  • Albertazzi L (2001b) Presentation and production. In: Albertazzi L, Jacquette D, Poli R (eds) The school of Alexius Meinong. Ashgate, Aldershot, pp 239–260

    Google Scholar 

  • Albertazzi L (2001c) Vittorio Benussi. In: Albertazzi L, Jacquette D, Poli R (eds) The school of Alexius Meinong. Aldershot, Asghate, pp 95–133

    Google Scholar 

  • Albertazzi L (2006a) Immanent realism: introduction to Franz Brentano. Springer, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • Albertazzi L (2006b) Das rein Figurale. Gestalt Theory 28(1/2):123–151

    Google Scholar 

  • Albertazzi L (2007) Intentional presentations. At the roots of consciousness. In: Jordan S, McBride DM (eds) The concept of consciousness. Integrating an emergent science. J Conscious Stud 14(1–2):94–114 (special issue)

    Google Scholar 

  • Albertazzi L (2011) Renata Calabresi: the experimental analysis of the present. Hist Psychol 14(1):53–79

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Albertazzi L (2012) Qualitative perceiving. J Conscious Stud 26:6–31

    Google Scholar 

  • Albertazzi L (2013) Appearances from a radical standpoint. In: Albertazzi L (ed) The Wiley-Blackwell handbook of experimental phenomenology. Visual perception of shape, space and appearance. Wiley, Chichester, pp 267–290

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Albertazzi L, van Tonder G, Vishwanath D (2010) Information in perception. In: Albertazzi L, van Tonder G, Vishwanath D (eds) Perception beyond inference: the information content of visual processes. MIT Press, Cambridge, pp 1–26

    Google Scholar 

  • Ameseder R (1904) Beiträge zur Grundlegung der Gegenstandstheorie. Über absolute Auffälligkeits der Farben. In: Meinong A (ed) Untersuchungen zur Gegenstandstheorie und Psychologie. Barth, Leipzig, pp 53–120

    Google Scholar 

  • Benussi V (1904) Zur Psychologie der Gestalterfassens (Die Müller-Lyer Figur). In: Meinong A (ed) Untersuchungen zur Gegenstandstheorie und Psychologie. Barth, Leipzig, pp 303–448

    Google Scholar 

  • Benussi V (1905) La natura delle cosiddette illusioni ottico-geometriche. In: Sergi G (ed) Atti del V Congresso Internazionale di Psicologia. Forzani, Rome, pp 262–267

    Google Scholar 

  • Benussi V (1906) Über Vorstellungsinadäquatheit. I. Das Erfassen gestaltmehrdeutiger Komplexe. Zeitschrift für Psychologie 42:22–25

    Google Scholar 

  • Benussi V (1907) Zur experimentelle Analyse des Zeitvergleichs. Archiv für die gesamte Psychologie 9:572–579

    Google Scholar 

  • Benussi V (1912) Review of Koffka-Kenkel, Beiträge zur Psychologie der Gestalt- und Bewegungserlebnisse I. Archiv für die gesamte Psychologie 32:50

    Google Scholar 

  • Benussi V (1913) Psychologie der Zeitauffassung. Winter, Heidelberg

    Google Scholar 

  • Benussi V, Liel W (1904) Die verschobene Schachbrettfigur. In: Meinong A (ed) Untersuchungen zur Gegenstandstheorie und Psychologie. Barth, Leipzig, pp 449–472

    Google Scholar 

  • Bergmann U (1967) Realism: a critique of Brentano and Meinong. University of Wisconsin Press, Madison

    Google Scholar 

  • Bregman AS (1994) Auditory scene analysis. MIT Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Brentano F (1874/1995) Psychologie vom Empirischen Standpunkte. Duncker & Humblot, Leipzig (trans: McAlister L). Routledge, London

  • Brentano F (1895) Meine letzen Wünsche für Österreich. Cotta, Stuttgart

    Google Scholar 

  • Brentano F (1933/1981) Kategorienlehre. Meiner, Hamburg (trans: Chisholm RM, Guterman N, 1981). Nijhoff, The Hague/Boston/London

  • Brentano F (1982/1995). Descriptive Psychologie. In: Chisholm RM, Baumgartner W (eds) Meiner, Hamburg (trans: Müller B). Routledge & Kegan Paul, London

  • Brentano F (1987) Von der Natur der Vorstellung. Ein Diktat von der Nachlass. Conceptus 21(53–54):25–31

    Google Scholar 

  • Brentano F (1994) Diktate über die Zeit (1907 und 1915) (trans: Albertazzi L). Axiomathes 1:305–325

    Google Scholar 

  • Calabresi R (1930) La determinazione del presente psichico. Bemporad, Florence

    Google Scholar 

  • Chisholm RM (1960) Realism and the background of phenomenology. The Free Press, Glencoe

    Google Scholar 

  • Cornelius H (1892) Über Verschmelzung und Analyse. Vierteljahrschrift für wissenshaftliche Philosophie 16:404–446

    Google Scholar 

  • Eagleman DM (2010) The strange mapping between the timing of neural signals and perception. In: Nijhawan R (ed) Issues of space and time in perception and action. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Findlay JN (1933) Meinong’s theory of objects. Oxford University Press, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Findlay JN (1963) Meinong’s theory of objects and values, 2nd edn. The Clarendon Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Fraisse P (1952) La perception de la durée comme organisation du successif. Anneée psichologique 52:39–46

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fraisse P (1964) The psychology of time. Eyre and Spottiswoode, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Fujisaki W, Shimojo S, Kashino M, Nishida S (2004) Recalibration of audiovisual simultaneity. Nat Neurosci 7(7):773–779

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gregory RL (1986) Odd perceptions. Methuen, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Grossmann R (1974) Meinong. Routledge & Kegan Paul, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Grossman R (2001) Meinong’s main mistake. In: Albertazzi L, Jacquette D, Poli R (eds) The school of Alexius Meinong. Ashgate, Aldershot, pp 477–488

    Google Scholar 

  • Haller R (1966) Meinongs Gegenstandstheorie und Ontologie. J Hist Philos 5:313–324

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harrar V, Harris LR (2005) The effect of exposure to asynchronous audio, visual and tactile stimulus combinations on the perception of simultaneity. Exp Brain Res 186:517–524

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Helmholtz H (1896) Handbuch der physiologischen Optik, 2nd edn. Hamburg, Voss

    Google Scholar 

  • Hochberg H (2005) Being and nothingness, nichtsein and aussersein, facts and negation: Meinongian reflections in Satre and Russell. Meinong Stud 1:199–232

    Google Scholar 

  • Husserl E (1891/1970) Philosophie der Arithmetik: Psychologische und logische Untersuchungen. Niemeyer, Halle (trans: Husserliana XII, 1970). Nijhoff, The Hague

  • Husserl E (1966/1991) Zur Phänomenologie des inneren Zeitbewusstseins. In: Boehm R, Husserliana X (eds) Nijhoff, Den Haag (trans: Barnett Brough J, 1991). Kluwer, Dordrecht

  • Jacquette D (1990–1991). The origins of Gegenstandstheorie: immanent and transcendent intentional objects in Brentano, Twardowsky, and Meinong. Brentano Studien 3:277–302

  • Jacquette D (1995) Meinong’ s concept of implexive being and nonbeing. Grazer Philosophische Studien 50:233–271

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jacquette D (1996) On defoliating Meinong’s jungle. In: Albertazzi L (ed) The philosophy of Alexius Meinong. Axiomathes 7:17–42 (special issue)

  • Jacquette D (2001) Aussersein of the pure object. In: Albertazzi L, Jacquette D, Poli R (eds) The school of Alexius Meinong. Ashgate, Aldershot, pp 373–396

    Google Scholar 

  • Kanizsa G (1952) Legittimità di un’analisi del processo percettivo fondata su una distinzione in ‘fasi’ o ‘stadi’. Archivio di psicologia, neurologia e psichiatria 13:292–323

    Google Scholar 

  • Kanizsa G (1979) Organization in vision: essays on Gestalt perception. Praeger, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Klemm O (1925) Über die Wirksamkeit kleinster Zeitunterschiede auf dem Gebiete des Tatsinns. Archiv für die gesamte Psychologie 50:205–220

    Google Scholar 

  • Koenderink JJ, Richards W, van Doorn A (2012) Blow up: a free lunch? i-Perception 3(2):141–145

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koffka K, Kenkel F (1913) Beiträge zur Psychologie der Gestalt- und Bewegungserlebnisse I. Untersuchungen über den Zusammenhang zwischen Erscheinungsgrösse und Erscheinungsbewegung bei einigen sogennanten optische Täuschungen. Zeitschrift für Psychologie 67:353–449

    Google Scholar 

  • Kopinska A, Harris LR (2004) Simultaneity constancy. Perception 33(9):1049–1060

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ladefoged P, Broadbent DE (1960) Perception of sequence in auditory events. Quart J Exp Psychol 12(3):162–170

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lambert K (1983) Meinong and the principle of independence: its place in Meinong’s theory of objects and its significance in contemporary philosophical logic. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindenfeld DF (1980) The transformation of positivism. Alexius Meinong and European thought, 1880–1920. University of California Press, Berkeley/Los Angeles/London

    Google Scholar 

  • Mach E (1886) Beiträge zur Analyse der Empfindungen. Fischer, Jena (trans: 1897) Open Court, La Salle

  • Mally E (1904) Untersuchungen zur Gegenstandstheorie des Messens. In: Meinong A (ed) Untersuchungen zur Gegenstandstheorie und Psychologie. Barth, Leipzig, pp 121–262

    Google Scholar 

  • Mausfeld R (2010) The perception of phenomenal material qualities and the internal semantics of the perceptual system. In: Albertazzi L, van Tonder G, Vishwanath D (eds) Perception beyond inference. The information content of visual processes. MIT Press, Cambridge, pp 159–200

    Google Scholar 

  • Mausfeld R (2013) The attributes of realness and the internal organization of perceptual reality. In: Albertazzi L (ed) The Wiley-Blackwell handbook of experimental phenomenology. Visual perception of shape, space and appearance. Wiley, Chichester, pp 91–118

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Meinong A (1882) Hume Studien II: Zur Relationstheorie. Sitzungsberichte der philosophisch-historischen Klasse der Kaiserlichen Akademie der Wissenschaften (Wien) 101:573–752 (reprinted in GA 2:1–183)

  • Meinong A (1887) Hume Studien I: Zur Geschichte und Kritik des modernen Nominalismus. Sitzungsberichte der philosophisch-historischen Klasse der Kaiserlischen Akademie der Wissenschaften 87:185–260 (reprinted in Alexius Meinong’s Gesamtausgabe (GA), Haller R, Kindiger R, Chisholm RM (eds) 7 volumes. 1:1–76. Akademische Druck- und Verlagsanstalt, Graz)

  • Meinong A (1891) Zur Psychologie der Komplexionen und Relationen. Zeitschrift für Psychologie und Physiologie der Sinnesorgane 2:245–265 (reprinted in GA, 1:279–303)

  • Meinong A (1896) Über die Bedeutung des WEBERschen Gesetzes. Beiträge zur Psychologie des Vergleichens und Messens (reprinted in GA, 2:215–372)

  • Meinong A (1899) Über Gegenstände höherer Ordnung und deren Verhältnis zur inneren Wahrnehmung. Zeitschrift für Psychologie und Psysiologie der Sinnesorgane 21:182–272 (reprinted in GA, 2:377–480)

  • Meinong A (ed) (1904a) Untersuchungen zur Gegenstandstheorie und Psychologie. Barth, Leipzig

  • Meinong A (1904b) Über Gegenstandstheorie (reprinted in GA, 2:481–535)

  • Meinong A (1910/1983) Über Annahmen, 1st edn 1902. Barth, Leipzig (reprinted in GA, 4:1–389, 517–535 (trans: Heanue J, 1983) University of California Press, Berkeley)

  • Michon JA (1967) Timing in temporal tracking. Institute for Perception RVO TNO, Soesterberg

    Google Scholar 

  • Michon JA, Jackson J (eds) (1985) Time, mind and behaviour. Springer, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller GA (1957) The magical number seven, plus or minus two: some limits on our capacity of processing information. Psychol Rev 63:81–97

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Musatti CL (1924) Sui fenomeni stereocinetici. Archivio italiano di psicologia 3:105–120

    Google Scholar 

  • Musatti CL (1926) Analisi del concetto di realtà empirica. Città di Castello Il Solco. Reprinted 1964 in Condizioni dell’esperienza e fondazione della psicologia. Editrice Universitaria, Florence

    Google Scholar 

  • Musatti CL (1931) Forma e assimilazione. Archivio italiano di psicologia 9:61–156

    Google Scholar 

  • Parsons T (1980) Nonexistent objects. Yale University Press, New Haven

    Google Scholar 

  • Poli R (1996) Object and measurement in Mally’s Untersuchungen. Axiomathes 7(1–2):173–186

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Poli R (2001) General theses of the theory of objects. In: Albertazzi L, Jacquette D, Poli R (eds) The school of Alexius Meinong. Ashgate, Aldershot, pp 347–372

    Google Scholar 

  • Rensink RA (2000) Seeing, sensing, scrutinizing. Vision Res 40:1469–1487

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rensink RA (2002) Change detection. Annu Rev Psychol 53:245–277

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rensink RA, O’Reagan JK, Clark J (1997) To see or not to see: the need for attention to perceive changes in scenes. Psychol Sci 8:368–373

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rollinger R (1999) Meinong and Husserl on assumptions. Axiomathes 7:89–102

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Routley R (1981) Exploring Meinong’s jungle and beyond. Australian National University, Camberra

    Google Scholar 

  • Rubin E (1949) Geräuschverschiebungsversuche. In: Rubin E (ed) Experimenta psychologica. Munskgaard, Copenhagen, pp 305–347

    Google Scholar 

  • Ryle G (1933) Review of J. N. Findlay, Meinong’s theory of objects. Oxford Rev 52:118–120

    Google Scholar 

  • Ryle G (1973) Intentionality-theory and nature of thinking. Revue Internationale de Philosophie 104–105

  • Schuhmann K (1993) Husserl and Twardowsky. In: Coniglione F, Poli R, Wolenski J (eds) Polish Scientific Philosophy. Rodopi, Amsterdam, pp 41–58

    Google Scholar 

  • Shams L, Kamitani Y, Shimojo S (2000) Illusions. What you see is what you hear. Nature 408(6814):788

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shams L, Kamitani Y, Shimojo S (2002) Visual illusion induced by sounds. Cogn Brain Res 14(1):147–152

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simons P (1995) Meinong’s theory of sense and reference. Grazer Philosophische Studien 50:171–186

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spillmann L (2009) Phenomenology and neurophysiological correlations: two approaches to perception research. Vision Res 49(12):1507–1521

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stroud JM (1956) The fine structure of psychological time. In: Quaster H (ed) Information theory in psychology. Free Press, Glencoe

    Google Scholar 

  • Sweet D (1993) The Gestalt controversy: the development of objects of higher order in Meinong’s ontology. Philos Phenomenol Res 53(3):553–575

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vicario GB (1998) Forms of events. In: Albertazzi L (ed) Shapes of form: from Gestalt psychology to phenomenology, ontology and mathematics. Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp 89–106

    Google Scholar 

  • Vishwanath D (2005) The epistemological status of vision and its implications for design. Axiomathes 15:399–486

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • von Ehrenfels C (1890) Über Gestaltqualitäten. Vierteljharschrift für wissenschaftliche Philosophie 14:242–292 (trans: Smith B (eds) 1988) Foundations of Gestalt Theory, 82–117. Philosophia Verlag, München-Wien

  • White AL, Linares D, Holcombe AO (2008) Visuomotor timing compensates for changes in perceptual latency. Curr Biol 18(20):R951–R953. doi:10.1016/j.cub.2008.08.022

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Witasek S (1910) Psychologie der Raumwahrnehmung des Auges. Winter, Heidelberg

    Google Scholar 

  • Wundt W (1902) Grundzüge der physiologischen Psychologie. Engelmann, Leipzig

    Google Scholar 

  • Zalta EN (1983) Abstract objects. Reidel, Dordrecht

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Zalta EN (1988) Intentional logic and the metaphysics of intentionality. The MIT Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Liliana Albertazzi.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Albertazzi, L. Dissecting Intentionality in the Lab: Meinong’s Theory. Axiomathes 23, 579–596 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10516-013-9213-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10516-013-9213-8

Keywords

Navigation