Abstract
Scholars have detected hostility to technology in Daoist thought. But is this a problem with any machine or only some applications of some machines by some people? I show that the problem is not with machines per se but with the people who introduce them, or more exactly with their knowledge. It is not knowledge as such that causes the disorder Laozi and Zhuangzi associate with machines; it is confused, disordered knowledge—superficial, inadequate, unsubtle, and artless. In other words the problem is not with machines but with the ethics of engineering and the government of technology. The Daoist argument does not devalue machines or knowledge of them; instead, it sets a new goal, defining an alternative ideal—alternative to techniques held hostage to despotic ideas about efficiency and profit.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Allen, Barry. 2008. Artifice and Design: Art and Technology in Human Experience. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
Analects. 2003. In Analects, with Selections from Traditional Commentaries. Trans. Edward Slingerland. Indianapolis, Ind.: Hackett.
Bray, Francesca. 1984. Agriculture (Science and Civilization in China, vol. 6, part 2). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
Dao De Jing. 2003. Trans. Roger T. Ames and David L. Hall. New York: Random House, 2003.
Guanzi. 2005. 4 vols. In the Library of Chinese Classics. Bilingual edition. Trans. Zhai Jianyue 翟江月. 4 volumes Guilin 桂林: Guangxi Shifan Daxue Chubanshe 廣西師範大學出版社.
Jullien, François. 1999. The Propensity of Things: Toward a History of Efficacy in China. Trans. Janet Lloyd. New York: Zone Books
_____. 2004. A Treatise on Efficacy: Between Western and Chinese Thinking. Trans. Janet Lloyd. Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press.
Lloyd, G. E. R. 2002. The Ambitions of Curiosity: Understanding the World in Ancient Greece and China. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Lo, Qin Shun. 1987. Knowledge Painfully Acquired. Ed. and trans. Irene Bloom. New York: Columbia University Press
Lü, Buwei. 2005. The Spring and Autumn of Lü Buwei. Trans. by Zhai Jianyue. Guilin: Guangxi Normal University Press
Mengzi. 2008. In Mengzi, with Selections from Traditional Commentaries. Trans. by Bryan W. Van Norden. Indianapolis, Ind.: Hackett.
Needham, Joseph. 1956. History of Scientific Thought (Science and Civilization in China, vol. 2). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
_____. 1971. Civil Engineering and Nautics (Science and Civilization in China, vol. 4, part 3). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Sawyer, Ralph D. 2004. The Tao of Spycraft: Intelligence Theory and Practice in Traditional China. Boulder, Colo.: Westview Press.
Schipper, Kristofer. 1993. The Taoist Body. Trans. Karen C. Duval. Berkeley: University of California Press
Temple, Robert. 2007. The Genius of China: 3000 Years of Science, Discovery, and Invention. Rochester, Vt.: Inner Traditions.
Usher, Abbott Payson. 1959. A History of Mechanical Inventions. Revised ed. Boston: Beacon
Zhuangzi. 1999. In the Library of Chinese Classics. Bilingual edition. Changsha 長沙: Hunan Renmin Chubanshe 湖南人民出版社
_____. 2007. Trans. by Hyun Höchsmann and Yang Guorong. New York: Pearson Longman, 2007.
Ziporyn, Brook. 2003. The Penumbra Unbound: The Neo-Taoist Philosophy of Guo Xiang. Albany: State University of New York Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Allen, B. A Dao of Technology?. Dao 9, 151–160 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11712-010-9158-1
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11712-010-9158-1