Skip to main content
Log in

Determinants of Perceptions of Cheating: Ethical Orientation, Personality and Demographics

  • Published:
Journal of Business Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A sample of 227 business students from the United States and Australia was used to evaluate factors that impact business students' ethical orientation and factors that impact students' perceptions of ethical classroom behaviors. Perceptions of classroom behaviors was considered a surrogate for future perceptions of business behaviors. Independent factors included age, gender, religious orientation, country of origin, personality, and ethical orientation. A number of factors were related to ethical orientation, but only age and religious orientation exhibited much impact upon perceptions of ethical classroom behaviors.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Blalock, D.: 1996, ‘Study Shows Many Execs are Quick to Write Off Ethics’, Wall Street Journal (March 26), C1, C15.

  • Forrest, P. and T. K. Pritchett: 1990, ‘Business Students’ Perceptions of Ethics in the Classroom’, Journal of Midwest Marketing 5, 117–124.

    Google Scholar 

  • Forsyth, D. R.: 1980, ‘A Taxonomy of Ethical Idealogies’, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 39(1), 175–184.

    Google Scholar 

  • Forsyth, D. R.: 1981, ‘Moral Judgment: The Influence of Ethical Idealogy’, Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 7(2), 218–223.

    Google Scholar 

  • Forsyth, D. R. and R. E. Berger: 1982, ‘The Effects of Ethical Ideology on Moral Behavior’, The Journal of Social Psychology 117, 53–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Forsyth, D. R. and W. R. Pope: 1984, ‘Ethical Ideology and Judgments of Social Psychological Research: Multidimensional Analysis’, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 46(6), 1365–1375.

    Google Scholar 

  • Forsyth, D. R. and J. L. Nye: 1990, ‘Personal Moral Philosophies and Moral Choice’, Journal of Research in Personality 24, 398–414.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, Donald A.: 1995, ‘How Psychological Type Influences Our Values’, Bulletin of Psychological Type 18(1) (Winter), 30–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keirsey, D. and M. Bates: 1984, Please Understand Me (Prometheus Nemesis Books, Del Mar, CA).

    Google Scholar 

  • Myers, I. B. and M. H. McCaulley: 1989, Manual: A Guide to the Development and Use of the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator (Consulting Psychologists Press, Palo Alto, CA).

    Google Scholar 

  • Pearman, R.: 1994, ‘A Possible Transpersonal Core: Values and Type’, Bulletin of Psychological Type 17(4), 12–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Terpstra, D. E., E. J. Rozell and R. K. Robinson: 1993, ‘The Influence of Personality and Demographic Variables on Ethical Decisions Related to Insider Trading’, The Journal of Psychology 127(4), 375–389.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schlenker, B. R. and D. R. Forsyth: 1977, ‘On the Ethics of Psychological Research’, Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 13, 369–396.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quinn, M. T., R. J. Lewis and K. L. Fischer: 1992, ‘A Cross-Correlation of the Myers-Briggs and Keirsey Instruments’, Journal of College Student Development 33(3), 279–280.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vitell, S. J., K. C. Rallapalli and A. Singhapakdi: 1993, ‘Marketing Norms: The Influence of Personal Moral Philosophies and Organizational Ethical Culture’, Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 21(4), 331–337.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Allmon, D.E., Page, D. & Rpberts, R. Determinants of Perceptions of Cheating: Ethical Orientation, Personality and Demographics. Journal of Business Ethics 23, 411–422 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1006087104087

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1006087104087

Keywords

Navigation