Skip to main content
Log in

Ethics of Human Enhancement: An Executive Summary

  • Comment
  • Published:
Science and Engineering Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. For an overview of ethical and social issues of nanotechnology beyond its role in human enhancement, see Allhoff and Lin 2006; Lin and Allhoff 2007; Allhoff et al. 2007; Allhoff and Lin 2008; and Allhoff et al. 2010.

References

  • Allhoff, F. (2005). Germ-line genetic enhancement and Rawlsian primary goods. Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal, 15.1, 39–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Allhoff, F., & Lin, P. (2006). What’s so special about nanotechnology and nanoethics? International Journal of Applied Philosophy, 20.2, 179–190.

    Google Scholar 

  • Allhoff, F., & Lin, P. (2008). Nanotechnology & society: Current and emerging ethical issues. Dordrecht: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Allhoff, F., Lin, P., Moor, J., & Weckert, J. (Eds.). (2007). Nanoethics: The ethical and social implications of nanotechnology. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Allhoff, F., Lin, P., Moor, J., & Weckert, J. (2009). Ethics of human enhancement: 25 questions and answers. http://www.humanenhance.com/NSF_report.pdf. Accessed 27 Nov 2009.

  • Allhoff, F., Lin, P., & Moore, D. (2010). What is nanotechnology and why does it matter? From science to ethics. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-Blackwell Publishing.

  • Bailey, R. (2005). Liberation biology: The scientific and moral case for the biotech revolution. Amherst, NY: Prometheus Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Camus, A. (1951). The Rebel: An essay on man in revolt (Vintage International edition, 1982). New York: Vintage International.

    Google Scholar 

  • Daniels, N. (2000). Normal functioning and the treatment-enhancement distinction. Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics, 9, 309–322.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de Grey, A. (2007). Ending aging: The rejuvenation breakthroughs that could reverse human aging in our lifetime. New York: St. Martin's Press.

  • Friends of the Earth. (2006). The disruptive social impacts of nanotechnology: Issue summary. http://nano.foe.org.au/node/151. Accessed 1 Aug 2009.

  • Fukuyama, F. (2002). Our posthuman future: Consequences of the biotechnology revolution. New York: Picador.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fukuyama, F. (2006). Beyond bioethics: A proposal for modernizing the regulation of human biotechnologies. Washington DC: School of Advanced International Studies, Johns Hopkins University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greely, H. (2005). Regulating human biological enhancements: Questionable justifications and international complications. The Mind, the Body, and the Law: University of Technology, Sydney, Law Review, 7, 87–110. Santa Clara Journal of International Law, 4, 87–110 (2006) (joint issue).

  • Guston, D., Parsi, J., & Tosi, J. (2007). Anticipating the ethical and political challenges of human nanotechnologies. In F. Allhoff, P. Lin, J. Moor, & J. Weckert (Eds.), Nanoethics: The ethical and social implications of nanotechnology. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.

  • Harris, J. (2007). Enhancing evolution: The ethical case for making ethical people. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hick, J. (1966). Evil and the god of love. New York: Harper and Row Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hill, S. E. (2006). Dissatisfied by design: The evolution of discontent. Dissertation. University of Texas, Austin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hobbes, T. (1651). Leviathan (Penguin Classics edition, 1982). New York: Penguin Group.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hughes, J. (2004). Citizen cyborg: Why democratic societies must respond to the redesigned human of the future. Cambridge, MA: Westview Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kurzweil, R. (2005). The singularity is near: When humans transcend biology. New York: Viking Penguin.

  • Lin, P. (2007). Nanotechnology bound: Evaluating the case for more regulation. NanoEthics, 2, 105–122.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lin, P., & Allhoff, F. (2007). Nanoscience and nanoethics: Defining the disciplines. In F. Allhoff, P. Lin, J. Moor, & J. Weckert (Eds.), Nanoethics: The ethical and social implications of nanotechnology (pp. 3–16). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.

  • Lin, P., & Allhoff, F. (2008). Untangling the debate: The ethics of human enhancement. NanoEthics, 2, 251–264.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McKibben, B. (2004). Enough: Staying human in an engineered age. New York: Henry Holt & Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mielke, J. (2008). Digital tattoo interface entry at greener gadgets design competition 2008, New York, NY, February 2008. http://www.core77.com/competitions/GreenerGadgets/projects/4673/. Accessed 1 Aug 2009.

  • Naam, R. (2005). More than human. New York: Broadway Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nozick, R. (1974). Anarchy, state, and Utopia. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parviz, B.A., et al. (2008). Contact lens with integrated inorganic semiconductor devices. Presentation at 21st IEEE International Conference on Micro Electro Mechanical Systems, Tuscon, AZ, 13–17 January 2008.

  • Persaud, R. (2006). Does smarter mean happier? In J. Wilsdon & P. Miller (Eds.), Better humans? The politics of human enhancement and life extension. London: Demos.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peters, T. (2007). Are we playing god with nanoenhancement? In F. Allhoff, P. Lin, J. Moor, & J. Weckert (Eds.), Nanoethics: The ethical and social implications of nanotechnology. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.

  • President’s Council on Bioethics. (2003). Beyond therapy: Biotechnology and the pursuit of happiness. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rawls, J. (1971). A theory of justice. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roco, M., & Bainbridge, W. S. (2003). Converging technologies for improving human performance: Nanotechnology, biotechnology, information technology and cognitive science. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sandel, M. (2007). The case against perfection: Ethics in the age of genetic engineering. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Savulescu, J., & Bostrom, N. (2009). Human enhancement. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, B. (1973). Problems of the self. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Woodall, J. (2007). Programmed dissatisfaction: Does one gene drive all progress in science and the arts? The Scientist, 21(6), 63.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgement

The authors of the report gratefully acknowledge the support of the NSF under awards # 0620694 and 0621021.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Fritz Allhoff.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Allhoff, F., Lin, P. & Steinberg, J. Ethics of Human Enhancement: An Executive Summary. Sci Eng Ethics 17, 201–212 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-009-9191-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-009-9191-9

Keywords

Navigation