Abstract
Norway’s living kidney donation-rate is among the highest in the world (36 per million). According to questionnaire-results, donors enjoy better than average health, presumably due to the strict medical criteria for being allowed to donate and life long medical follow up. However, in recent years international studies have cast doubt on the predominantly positive picture of donors and recipients, particularly regarding psychological aspects of transplantation surgery and donor evalutation. Findings in this study derive from anthropological fieldwork lasting 36 months at three university hospitals in the Oslo-basin. 18 end stage kidney disease patients and their potential donors were recruited opportunistically and interviewed (separately) in three or more semi-structured conversations during the evaluation process and after transplantation. 3 cases are discussed in detail. Notes were transcribed and analysed according to narrative theory. Focus was to explore the content of donors’ and recipients’ pre- and post-transplantation narratives and to examine whether these accounts warrant a need for more comprehensive psychological assessment than is current practice in Norway. Donor- and recipient-narratives are well suited as a tool to improve living kidney donation-decisions. The material indicates a need to offer psychological care to LKD-partners, before and after transplantation.
Similar content being viewed by others
Abbreviations
- LKD:
-
Living kidney donation
- ESRD:
-
End stage renal disease
- LD:
-
Living donation
- PKD:
-
Pre-emptive kidney donation
- DKD:
-
Deceased kidney donation
- DD:
-
Deceased donation
- PMP:
-
Per million population
- NTU:
-
National Transplant Unit
- PKT:
-
Pre-dialytic kidney transplantation
References
Afsar, B., and B. Akman. 2009. Depression and nonadherence are closely related in dialysis patients. Kidney International 76(6):679; author reply 679–680.
Bakhtin, M., ed. 1981. The dialogic imagination, ed. M. Homquist. Austin: University of Texas Press.
Biller-Andorno, N., and H. Schauenburg. 2001. It’s only love? Some pitfalls in emotionally related organ donation. Journal of Medical Ethics 27(3): 162–164.
Charon, R. 2004. Narrative and medicine. New England Journal of Medicine 350(9): 862–864.
Douglas, M. 1992. Risk and blame: essays in cultural theory. London: Routledge.
Fagerli, R.A., M.E. Lien, and M. Wandel. 2005. Experience of dietary advice among Pakistani-born persons with type 2 diabetes in Oslo. Appetite 45(3): 295–304.
Ferhman-Ekholm, I., C.-G. Elinder, M. Steinbeck, G. Tydén, and C.-G. Groth. 1997. Kidney donors live longer. Transplantation 64(7): 976–978.
Filocamo, M.T., M. Zanazzi, V. Li Marzi, G. Lombardi, G. Del Popolo, G. Mancini, M. Salvadori, and G. Nicita. 2009. Sexual dysfunction in women during dialysis and after renal transplantation. Journal of Sex Medicine 6(11): 3125–3131.
Frank, A.W. 1995. The wounded storyteller. Chicago and London: The University of Chicago Press.
Franklin, P.M., A.K. Crombie. 2003. Live related renal transplantation: psychological, social, and cultural issues. Transplantation 76(8): 1247–1252.
Godbout, J.T. 1998. The moral of the gift. Journal of Socio-Economics 27(4): 557–570.
Godelier, M. 1999. The enigma of the gift. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press in association with Blackwell Publishers Ltd.
Gordon, E.J. 2001. They don't have to suffer for me: why dialysis patients refuse offers of living donor kidneys. Medical Anthropology Quarterly 15(2): 245–267
Gregory, C.A. 1993. Exchange and reciprocity. In Companion Encylopedia of anthropology, ed. T. Ingold, 911–939. London, New York: Routldge.
Hartmann, A., P. Fauchald, L. Westlie, I.B. Brekke, and H. Holdaas. 2003. The risk of living kidney donation. Nephrology, Dialysis, Transplantation 18: 871–873.
Helse- og omsorgsdepartementet. 1999. Law on patient rights. Pasientrettighetsloven 1999-07-02-63. Norway: HOD (Helse- og omsorgsdepartementet).
Hyde, L. 1979. The gift. Imagination and the erotic life of property. New York: Rndom House Inc.
Jindal, R.M., R.T. Neff, K.C. Abbott, F.P. Hurst, E.A. Elster, E.M. Falta, P. Patel, and D. Cukor. 2009. Association between depression and nonadherence in recipients of kidney transplants: analysis of the United States renal data system. Transplant Proceedings 41(9): 3662–3666.
Kierans, C. 2005. Narrating kidney disease: the significance of sensation and time in the emplotment of patient experience. Culture, Medicine and Psychiatry 29(3): 341–359.
Labov, W. 1969. The logic of nonstandard english. In Language, social context: Selected readings, ed. P.P. Giglioli. Harmondsworth: Penguin.
Langewitz, W., M. Denz, and A. Keller. 2002. Spontaneous talking time at start of consultation in outpatient clinic: Cohort study. BMJ 325: 682–683
Leivestad, T. 2009. Annual Report The Norwegian Renal Registry (Norsk Nefrologiregister). Oslo.
Lopes, A., I.C. Frade, L. Teixeira, C. Oliveira, M. Almeida, L. Dias, and A.C. Henriques. 2011. Depression and anxiety in living kidney donation: Evaluation of donors and recipients. Transplantation Proceedings 43(1): 131–136.
Lyengar, S. 2010. The art of choosing. UK: Little Brown.
Mattingly, C. 1998. Healing dramas and clinical plots. The narrative structure of experience. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Mauss, M. 1969. The gift: The form and reason for exchange in archaic societies. London: Routledg & Kegan Paul Ltd.
Mishler, E.G. 1986. Research interviewing: Context and narrative. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Mjøen, G., O. Øyen, H. Holdaas, K. Midtvedt, and P.D. Line. 2009. Morbidity and mortality in 1022 consecutive living donor nephrectomies: Benefits of a living donor registry. Transplantation 88(11): 1273–1279.
Pascazio, L., I.B. Nardone, A. Clarici, G. Enzmann, M. Grignetti, G.O. Panzetta, and C. Vecchiet. 2010. Anxiety, depression and emotional profile in renal transplant recipients and healthy subjects: A comparative study. Transplantation Proceedings 42(9): 3586–3590.
Reissman, C., ed. 2002. Analysis of personal narratives. In Handbook of interview research, vol. 30, ed. J. Gubrium and J. Holstein. Thousand Oaks California: Sage.
Sahlins, M. 1972. Stone age economics. London: Tavistock.
Schneider, D.M. 1980. American kinship: A cultural account. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: University of Chicago Press.
Squire, C. 2007. HIV in South Africa: Talking about the Big THing. London: Rouledge.
Steiner, T., H. Wunderlich, and U. Ott. 2009. Sexuality after kidney transplantation. Urologe A 48(12): 1438–1442.
Virzi, A., M.S. Signorelli, M. Veroux, G. Giammarresi, S. Maugeri, A. Nicoletti, and P. Veroux. 2007. Depression and quality of life in living related renal transplantation. Transplant Proceedings 39(6): 1791–1793.
Westlie, L., P. Fauchald, T. Talseth, A. Jakobsen, and A. Flatmark. 1993. Quality of life in Norwegian kidney donors. Nephrology, Dialysis, Transplantation 8: 1145–1150.
Witczak, B.J., T. Leivestad, P.D. Line, and H. Holdaas. 2009. Experience from an active preemptive kidney transplantation program—809 cases revisited. Transplantation 88(5): 672–677.
Zeiler, K., L. Guntram, and A. Lennerling. 2010. Moral tales of parental living kidney donation: a parenthood moral imperative and its relevance for decision making. Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 13(3): 225–236.
Acknowledgments
This study has been made possible by a 3-year scholarship from Extra Foundation (Oslo, Norway). My gratitude is specially directed to the informants in my fieldwork who generously shared their positive and sometimes sadder experiences of transplantation and donation with me. I also wish to thank the head of the nephrology ward at Oslo University Hospital (Ullevaal), Aud-Eldrid Stenehjem, MD, PhD. nephrologist. Solbjørg Sagedal, MD, PhD, and the head of the nephrology ward at Buskerud Regional Hospital, Kristian Selvig, MD, without whose support I would not have had access to my informants. Special thanks are due to my husband, Egil Alnaes, MD, PhD, who weeded away medical misunderstandings, proof read meticulously and whose comments have been an inspiration. Extra thanks to professor in medical ethics, Jan Helge Solbakk, MD, Dr. philos, and to my anthropologist colleague, senior researcher Kirsten Danielsen at NOVA, Oslo. Last but not least, professor emeritus in literature. Jostein Bortnes Dr. philos, Bergen University, has contributed invaluable advice and input on several drafts of this article.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Hambro Alnaes, A. Narratives: an essential tool for evaluating living kidney donations. Med Health Care and Philos 15, 181–194 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11019-011-9337-9
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11019-011-9337-9