Abstract
A version of nonstandard analysis, Internal Set Theory, has been used to provide a resolution of Zeno's paradoxes of motion. This resolution is inadequate because the application of Internal Set Theory to the paradoxes requires a model of the world that is not in accordance with either experience or intuition. A model of standard mathematics in which the ordinary real numbers are defined in terms of rational intervals does provide a formalism for understanding the paradoxes. This model suggests that in discussing motion, only intervals, rather than instants, of time are meaningful. The approach presented here reconciles resolutions of the paradoxes based on considering a finite number of acts with those based on analysis of the full infinite set Zeno seems to require. The paper concludes with a brief discussion of the classical and quantum mechanics of performing an infinite number of acts in a finite time.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
REFERENCES
Benacerraf, P.: 1970, 'Tasks, Super-Tasks, and the Modern Eleatics', in W. C. Salmon (ed.), Zeno's Paradoxes, Bobbs-Merrill, Indianapolis and New York, pp. 103–129.
Berkeley, G.: 1734, The Analyst, excerpted in J. R. Newman (ed.), 1956 The World of Mathematics, Simon and Schuster, New York, vol. 1, pp. 288–293.
Davis, M.: 1983, Review of E. Nelson's 'Internal Set Theory: A New Approach to Nonstandard Analysis', Journal of Symbolic Logic 48, 1203–204.
Gottfried, K.: 1966, Quantum Mechanics, W. A. Benjamin, New York.
Grünbaum, A.: 1968, Modern Science and Zeno's Paradoxes, George Allen and Unwin Ltd, London.
Grünbaum, A.: 1970, 'Modern Science and Zeno's Paradoxes of Motion', in W. C. Salmon (ed.), Zeno's Paradoxes, Bobbs-Merrill, Indianapolis and New York, pp. 200–250.
James, W.: 1948, Some Problems of Philosophy, Longmans, Green and Co., Ltd., London.
McLaughlin, W. I.: 1994, 'Resolving Zeno's Paradoxes', Scientific American, November, 84–89.
McLaughlin, W. I. and Miller, S. L.: 1992, 'An Epistemological Use of Non-standard Analysis to Answer Zeno's Objections Against Motion', Synthese 92, 371–84.
Nelson, E.: 1977, 'Internal Set Theory: A New Approach to Nonstandard Analysis', Bulletin of the American Mathematical Society 83, 1165–98.
Robinson, A.: 1966, Non-standard Analysis, North Holland, Amsterdam. (2nd ed., American Elsevier, New York, 1974).
Rudin, W.: 1966, Real and Complex Analysis, McGraw-Hill, New York.
Russell, B.: 1929, Our Knowledge of the External World, W. W. Norton, New York.
Salmon, W. C.: 1970, 'Introduction' in W. C. Salmon (ed.), Zeno's Paradoxes, BobbsMerrill, Indianapolis and New York, pp. 5–44.
Smart, J. J. C.: 1967, 'Time', in P. Edwards (ed.), The Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Macmillan, New York, Vol. 8, pp. 126–134.
Steen, L. A.: 1971, 'New Models of the Real-Number Line', Scientific American, August, 92–99.
Stolzenberg, G.: 1990, 'Notes on Real Analysis', unpublished.
Suppes, P.: 1960, Axiomatic Set Theory, D. Van Nostrand, New Jersey.
Thomson, J.: 1970a, 'Tasks and Super-Tasks', in W. C. Salmon (ed.), Zeno's Paradoxes, Bobbs-Merrill, Indianapolis and New York, pp. 89–102.
Thomson, J.: 1970b, 'Comments on Professor Benacerraf's Paper', in W. C. Salmon (ed.), Zeno's Paradoxes, Bobbs-Merrill, Indianapolis and New York, pp. 130–138.
Vlastos, G.: 1967, 'Zeno of Elea', in P. Edwards (ed.), The Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Macmillan, New York, Vol. 8, pp. 369–79.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Alper, J.S., Bridger, M. MATHEMATICS, MODELS AND ZENO'S PARADOXES. Synthese 110, 143–166 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1004967023017
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1004967023017