Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Rethinking Autonomy

  • Published:
Minds and Machines Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper explores the assumption of autonomy. Several arguments are presented against the assumption of runtime autonomy as a principle of design for artificial intelligence systems. The arguments vary from being theoretical, to practical, and to analytic. The latter parts of the paper focus on one strategy for building non-autonomous systems (the practice view). One critical theme is that intelligence is not located in the system alone, it emerges from a history of interactions among user, builder, and designer over a given set of data as mediated by the system. A second critical theme is that artificially intelligent systems are ongoing projects that must be continuously adapted and revised using joint person-machine efforts.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alterman, R. (1998), Adaptive planning, Cognitive Science, 12, pp. 93-421.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alterman, R. Griffin, D. (1996), Improving case retrieval by remembering questions. In Proceedings of the Fourteenth National Conference on Artificial Intelligence, pp. 678-683.

  • Alterman, R. and Griffin, D. (1997), Improvement as a Function of Use. Technical Report TR-CS-95-182, Brandeis University.

  • Alterman, R. Zito-Wolf, R. and Carpenter, T. (1998), Pragmatic Action. Cognitive Science, 22(1), pp. 53-105.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, J. R. (1982), Acquisition of Cognitive Skill, Psychological Review, 89, 369-406.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carpenter, T. and Alterman, R. (1994), A Reading Agent. In Proceedings of the Twelfth National Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.

  • Cole, M. and Engestrom, Y. (1993), A Cultural Historic Approach to Distributed Cognition, In Salomon, G. ed, Distributed Cognitions, pp. 1-46, Cambridge University Press.

  • Friedman, B. and Kahn, Jr., P. (1992), ‘Human agency and responsible computing: implications for computer system design’, Journal Systems Software 17, pp. 7-14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grosz, B. (1996), Collaborative systems, Artificial Intelligence Magazine, 17, pp. 67-85.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grosz, B. and Kraus, S. (1996), Collaborative Plans for Complex Group Action. Artificial Intelligence, 86, pp. 269-357.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grosz, B. and Sidner, C. (1990), Plans for discourse, In P. R. Cohen, J. Morgan, and M. E. Pollack, Ed, Intentions in Communication, pp. 417-444, Bradford Books, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guralnik, D. B. ed, (1970), Webster's New World Dictionary of the American Language, Second College Edition, World Publishing Company, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hutchins, E. (1995), How a Cockpit Remembers its Speed, Cognitive Science, 19, pp. 265-288.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lave, J. (1988), Cognition in Practice, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Norman, D. A. (1988), The Psychology of Everyday Things, Basic Books.

  • Norman, D. A. (1991), Cognitive Artifacts, In J. M. Carroll, ed, Designing Interaction, pp. 17-38. Cambridge University Press.

  • Perkins, D. N. (1993), Person-Plus: A Distributed View of Thinking and Learning. In G. Salomon, ed, Distributed Cognitions, pp. 88-110, Cambridge University Press.

  • Pikes, R. E., Hart, P. E. and Nilsson, N. J. (1972), Learning and Executing Generalized Robot Plans. Artificial Intelligence, 3, pp. 251-288.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scribner, S. (1984), Studying Working Intelligence, In B. Rogoff and J. Lave, eds, Everyday Cognition, pp. 9-40, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scribner, S. and Cole, M. (1981), The Psychology of Literacy, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shneiderman, B. (1995), ‘Looking for the bright side of agents’, ACM Interactions 2(1), pp. 13-15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shneiderman, B. (1998), Designing the User Interface: Strategies for Effective Human-Computer Interaction, 3rd ed, Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley Publ. Co., 639 pages. Related book site at <http://www.awl.com/DTUI>.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shneiderman, B. and Maes, P. (1997), ‘Direct manipulation vs. software agents: A debate’, ACM Interactions 4(6), pp. 42-61.

    Google Scholar 

  • Suchman, L. A. (1987), Plans and Situated Actions, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Terveen, L. G. (1995), Overview of Human-Computer Collaboration, Knowledge-Based Systems, 8(2-3), pp. 67-81.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors
  1. Richard Alterman
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Alterman, R. Rethinking Autonomy. Minds and Machines 10, 15–30 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008351215377

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008351215377

Search

Navigation