References
Almog, J. 1986. “Naming Without Necessity.”Journal of Philosophy 83: 210–42.
Almog, J. 1991. “The Subject-Predicate Class—I.”Nous 25: 591–619.
Burge, T. 1977. “BeliefDe Re.”The Journal of Philosophy 69: 338–62.
Burge, T. 1982. “Other Bodies.” In A. Woodfield, ed.Thought and Object. New York: Oxford University Press, 97–120.
Church, A. 1982. “A Remark Concerning Quine's Paradox About Modality.”Analisis Filosofico 2: 25–32. Rpt. in N. Salmon and S. Soames, eds.Propositions and Attitudes. New York: Oxford University Press, 1988, 58–65.
Devitt, M. 1984. “Thoughts and Their Ascription.” in P. French, T. Uehling, and H. Wettstein, eds.Midwest Studies in Philosophy 9. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 385–420.
Donnellan, K. 1979. “The ContingentA Priori and Rigid Designators.” In P. French, T. Uehling, and H. Wettstein, eds.Contemporary Perspectives in the Philosophy of Language, Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 45–60.
Fitch, G. W. 1994. “Singular Propositions in Time.”Philosophical Studies 17: 181–87.
Forbes, G. 1989.Languages of Possibility. London: Basil Blackwell.
Hestevold, H. S. 1990. “Passage and the Presence of Experience.”Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 50: 537–52.
Kaplan, D. 1968. “Quantifying In.”Synthese 19: 175–214.
Kaplan, D. 1975. “How to Russell a Frege-Church.”The Journal of Philosophy 72: 716–29. Rpt. in M. Loux, ed.The Possible and the Actual. Ithica: Cornell University Press, 1979, 210–24.
Kaplan, D. 1989. “Demonstratives.” In J. Almog, J. Perry, and H. Wettstein, eds.Themes From Kaplan. New York: Oxford University Press, 481–563.
Kripke, S. 1972 “Naming and Necessity.” In D. Davidson, and G. Harman, eds.Semantics of Natural Language. Dordrecht: Reidel, 253–355 and 763–9. Rpt. asNaming and Necessity. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1980.
Kripke, S. 1979. “A Puzzle About Belief.” In A. Margalit, ed.Meaning and Use. Dordrecht: Reidel, 239–81.
Mellor, D. 1981.Real Time, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Perry, J. 1979. “The Problem of the Essential Indexical.”Nous 13: 3–21.
Prior, A. 1963. “Is the Concept of Referential Opacity Really Necessary?”Acta Philosophica Fennica 16: 189–99.
Quine, W. V. 1953. “Three Grades of Modal Involvement.”Proceedings of the XIth International Congress of Philosophy 14, Brussels: North-Holland Publishing Co. Rpt. in hisThe Ways of Paradox, revised and enlarged edition. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1976, 158–76.
Quine, W. V. 1956. “Quantifiers and Propositional Attitudes.”The Journal of Philosophy 53: 177–87.
Quine, W. V. 1979. “Intensions Revisited.” In P. French, T. Uehling, and H. Wettstein, eds.Contemporary Perspectives in the Philosophy of Language. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 268–74.
Salmon, N. 1986.Frege's Puzzle. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Schlesinger, G. 1991. “E Pur Si Muove.”The Philosophical Quarterly 41: 427–41.
Wettstein, H. 1988. “Cognitive Significance Without Cognitive Content.”Mind 97: 1–28. Rpt. in J. Almog, J. Perry, and H. Wettstein, eds.Themes From Kaplan. New York: Oxford University Press, 1991, 421–54.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Alter, T. Strongde re belief. Philosophia 28, 223–232 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02379777
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02379777