Abstract
In this chapter, I submit that virtue theory offers the best framework to account for our moral experience in life and in the context of business decision-making. And I argue against an empirically grounded objection to virtue theory, which holds that character traits of the sort postulated by virtue theorists do not exist because differences in social circumstances explain people’s behavior rather than any character trait. The objection does not succeed because virtue is rarer than we may expect, because the experimental evidence does not support the claim that character lacks any explanatory power, because virtues cannot be merely reduced to behavioral dispositions, and because virtue theory is concerned with the whole span of a human life rather than isolated behavior.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Notes
- 1.
Aretaic is derived from the ancient Greek word arete, usually translated as “excellence” or “virtue.” Aretaic thus means “of or pertaining to virtue or excellence.”
- 2.
What I describe in this section is the standard, Aristotelian, eudaimonistic version of virtue ethics. There are indeed other varieties of virtue ethics. Noneudaimonist versions of virtue ethics reject a strong relationship between virtue and eudaimonia. They include character or motive consequentialism, intuitionist theories of virtue, Kierkegaardian existencial virtue ethics, and Nietzschean theories [71, 57].
- 3.
The replication of the experiment was presumptively unavailable – for ethical reasons – until recently, when Jerry Burger, a psychology professor at Santa Clara University, managed to replicate the Milgram’s experiment with slight variations. The results simply confirm the original findings.
- 4.
Alternatively, Doris proposes that the situationist argument can be articulated as abductive: the variousness of human behavior is best explained by reference to the hypothesis that virtues are rarely substantiated in human beings [35, p. 633].
- 5.
One may also make a distinction between the explanatory and the predictive power of virtue attribution. While the question about predictive power is primarily an empirical question that can only be answered through observation, one may contend that the explanatory power of traits does not depend entirely on their predictive power.
- 6.
Notice that I wrote “according to virtue” rather than “from virtue.” I shall discuss this distinction in section “Irreducible Virtue.”
- 7.
Virtue theorists disagree on the question of the relation between virtue and imperfection. Whether the person of good character may ever respond – behaviorally or attitudinally – in deficient ways, that is, less than the wholly virtuous way, is a controversial subject. Annas seems to disagree. She advocates the strongest view: “a courageous person must behave courageously in roughly every situation”: “It is hard to see how any situation could be excluded” [6, p. 33]. Aristotle is sometimes interpreted as providing a more realistic portrait of virtue: “Aristotle’s virtuous person may act wrongly in seven different ways while remaining virtuous” [56].
References
Parfit D (2011) On what matters. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Audi R (2009) The Place of Ethical Theory in Business Ethics. In: Brenkert GG, Beauchamp TL (eds) The oxford handbook of business ethics. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Baron MW, Pettit P, Slote M (1997) Three methods of ethics: a debate (great debates in philosophy). Blackwell, Cambridge, MA/London
Slote MA (1992) From morality to virtue. Oxford University Press, New York
Trianosky GW (1986) Supererogation, wrongdoing, and vice: on the autonomy of the ethics of virtue. J Philos 83(1):26–40
Annas J (2003) Virtue ethics and social psychology. A Priori 2:20–33
Alzola M (2010) Business, ethics, and psychological realism. In: Toombs LA (ed) Best papers proceedings of the seventieth annual meeting of the academy of management, ISSN 1543–8643. Available at: http://business.fordham.edu/files/business_ethics_and_psychological_realism.pdf
Alzola M (2011) The reconciliation project. Separation and integration in business ethics research. J Bus Ethics 99(1):19–36
Goldman AI (1993) Ethics and cognitive science. Ethics 103(2):337–360
Flanagan OJ (1991) Varieties of moral personality: ethics and psychological realism. Harvard University Press, Cambridge
Griffin J (2008) On human rights. Book manuscript. Department of Philosophy, Rutgers University. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Doris JM (2002) Lack of character: personality and moral behavior. Cambridge University Press, New York
Harman G (1999) Moral philosophy meets social psychology: virtue ethics and the fundamental attribution error. Proc Aristot Soc 99:315–331
Darley JM, Batson CD (1973) From Jerusalem to Jericho: a study of situational and dispositional variables in helping behavior. J Pers Soc Psychol 27:100–108
Isen AM, Levin PF (1972) Effect of feeling good on helping: cookies and kindness. J Pers Soc Psychol 21:384–388
Latané B, Darley JM (1970) The unresponsive bystander: why doesn’t he help? Appelton-Century Crofts, New York
Ross L, Nisbett RE (1991) The person and the situation: perspectives of social psychology. Temple University Press, Philadelphia
Hartshorne H, May MA (1928) Studies in the nature of character, vol I, Studies in deceit. Mac-Millan, New York
Newcomb TM (1929) Consistency of certain extrovert-introvert behavior patterns in 51 problem boys. Columbia University, Teachers College/Bureau of Publications, New York
Baron RA (1997) The sweet smell of … helping: effects of pleasant ambient fragrance on prosocial behavior in shopping malls. Pers Soc Psychol Bull 23:498–503
Gino F, Schweitzer ME (2008) Blinded by anger or feeling the love: how emotions influence advice taking. J Appl Psychol 93(5):1165–1173
Kamstra MJ, Kramer LA, Levi MD (2003) Winter blues: a SAD stock market cycle. Am Econ Rev 93(1):324–343
Cao M, Wei J (2005) Stock market returns: a note on temperature anomaly. J Bank Financ 29(6):1559–1573
Schwarz N (2002) Situated cognition and the wisdom of feelings: Cognitive tuning. In: Feldman Barrett L, Salovey P (eds) The wisdom in feelings: psychological processes in emotional intelligence. Guilford, New York, pp 144–166
Darley JM, Latane B (1968) Bystander intervention in emergencies: diffusion of responsibility. J Pers Soc Psychol 8:377–383
Bargh JA, Chen M, Burrows L (1996) Automaticity of social behavior: direct effects of trait construct and stereotype activation on action. J Pers Soc Psychol 71:230–244
Garcia SM, Weaver KD, Moskowitz GB, Darley JM (2002) Crowded minds: the implicit bystander effect. J Pers Soc Psychol 83:843–853
Tang TL, Sutarso T, Davis Wu GM, Dolinski D, Ibrahim AH, Wagner SL (2008) To help or not to help? The good Samaritan effect and the love of money on helping behavior. J Bus Ethics 82:865–887
Wright PM, George JM, Farnsworth SR, McMahan GC (1993) Productivity and extra-role behavior: the effects of goals and incentives on spontaneous helping. J Appl Psychol 78(3):374–381
Milgram S (1974) Obedience to authority. Harper and Row, New York
Brief AP, Buttram RT, Elliot JD, Reizenstein RM, McCline RL (1995) Releasing the beast: a study of compliance with orders to use race as a selection criteria. J Soc Issue 51:177–193
Brief AP, Dietz J, Reizenstein Cohen R, Pugh SD, Vaslow JB (2000) Just doing business: modern racism and obedience to authority as explanations for employment discrimination. Organ Behav Hum Decis Process 81:72–97
Harman G (2003) No character or personality. Bus Ethics Quart 13:87–94
Harman G (2000) The nonexistence of character traits. Proc Aristot Soc 100:223–226
Doris JM (2005) “Précis” and replies: evidence and sensibility. Philos Phenomenol Res 72(632–5):656–677
Appiah KA (2008) Experiments in ethics. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA
Hursthouse R (1999) On virtue ethics. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Kamtekar R (2004) Situationism and virtue ethics on the content of our character. Ethics 114:458–491
Alzola M (2008) Character and environment: the status of virtues in organizations. J Bus Ethics 78:343–357
Buss AH (1989) Personality as traits. Am Psychol 44:1378–1388
Schneider B (1987) The people make the place. Pers Psychol 40:437–453
Blevins G, Murphy T (1974) Feeling good and helping: further phonebooth findings. Psychol Rep 34:326
Levine R, Norenzayan A, Philbrick K (2001) Cross-cultural differences in helping strangers. J Cross-Cult Psychol 32:543–560
Wuthnow R (1991) Acts of compassion: caring for others and helping ourselves. Princeton University Press, Princeton
Chatman J, Barsade S (1995) Personality, culture, and cooperation: Evidence from a business situation. Adm Sci Q 40:423–443
Staw BM, Bell N, Clausen J (1986) The dispositional approach to job attitudes: a lifetime longitudinal test. Adm Sci Q 31:56–77
Treviño L, Youngblood S (1990) Bad apples in bad barrels: a causal analysis of ethical decision-making behavior. J Appl Psychol 75(4):378–385
Barrick MR, Mount MK (1991) The big five personality dimensions and job performance: a meta-analysis. Pers Psychol 44:1–26
Chen Y, Mannix EA, Okumura T (2003) The importance of who you meet: effects of self-versus other-concerns among negotiators in the United States, the People’s Republic of China, and Japan. J Exp Soc Psychol 39:1–15
Bern D (1992) On the uncommon wisdom of our lay personality theory. Psychol Inq 3:82–84
Solomon R (2003) Victims of circumstances? A defense of virtue ethics in business. Bus Ethics Quart 13(1):43–62
Epstein S (1979) The stability of behavior: I. On predicting most of the people most of the time. J Pers Soc Psychol 37(7):1097–1126
Funder DC (1997) The personality puzzle, 1st edn. W.W. Norton & Co, New York
Aristotle (1999) Nicomachean ethics (NE) (trans: Irwin TH), 2nd edn. Hackett, Indianapolis
Wright GH (1963) The varieties of goodness. Routledge and Kegan, London
Curzer HJ (2005) How good people do bad things: Aristotle on the misdeeds of the virtuous. Oxf Stud Anc Philos 28:233–256
Driver J (1996) The Virtues and Human Nature. In: Crisp R (ed) How should one live? Oxford University Press, Oxford
Audi R (1979) Weakness of will and practical judgment. Noûs 13(2):173–196
Davidson D (1980) How is weakness of the will possible? In: Davidson D (ed) Essays on actions and events. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 21–42
Sober E (1990) Contrastive empiricism. In: Savage W (ed) Scientific theories, vol 14. University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis, pp 392–412
Mischel W (1968) Personality and assessment. Wiley, New York
Rosenthal R, Rubin DB (1982) A simple general purpose display of magnitude and experimental effect. J Educ Psychol 74:166–169
Sabini J, Silver M (2005) Lack of character? Situationism critiqued. Ethics 115:535–562
Funder DC, Ozer DJ (1983) Behavior as a function of the situation. J Pers Soc Psychol 44:107–112
Adams RM (2006) A theory of virtue: excellence in being for the good. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Annas J (2011) Intelligent virtue. Oxford University Press, New York
Cooper JM (1998) The unity of virtue. Soc Philos Policy 15(1):233–274
Irwin TH (1988) Disunity in the Aristotelian virtues. Oxf Stud Anc Philos Suppl Vol:61–78
Williams BAO (1985) Ethics and the limits of philosophy. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA
Geach PT (1977) The virtues. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, MA
Foot P (1983) Moral realism and moral dilemma. J Philos 80(7):379–398
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2013 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.
About this entry
Cite this entry
Alzola, M. (2013). The Empirics of Virtue Theory: What Can Psychology Tell Us About Moral Character?. In: Luetge, C. (eds) Handbook of the Philosophical Foundations of Business Ethics. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-1494-6_48
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-1494-6_48
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-007-1493-9
Online ISBN: 978-94-007-1494-6
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and Law