Skip to main content
Log in

Function without purpose

The uses of causal role function in evolutionary biology

  • Published:
Biology and Philosophy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Philosophers of evolutionary biology favor the so-called “etiological concept” of function according to which the function of a trait is its evolutionary purpose, defined as the effect for which that trait was favored by natural selection. We term this the selected effect (SE) analysis of function. An alternative account of function was introduced by Robert Cummins in a non-evolutionary and non-purposive context. Cummins's account has received attention but little support from philosophers of biology. This paper will show that a similar non-purposive concept of function, which we term causal role (CR) function, is crucial to certain research programs in evolutionary biology, and that philosophical criticisms of Cummins's concept are ineffective in this scientific context. Specifically, we demonstrate that CR functions are a vital and ineliminable part of research in comparative and functional anatomy, and that biological categories used by anatomists are not defined by the application of SE functional analysis. Causal role functions are non-historically defined, but may themselves be used in an historical analysis. Furthermore, we show that a philosophical insistence on the primary of SE functions places practicing biologists in an untenable position, as such functions can rarely be demonstrated (in contrast to CR functions). Biologists who study the form and function of organismal design recognize that it is virtually impossible to identify the past action of selection on any particular structure retrospectively, a requirement for recognizing SE functions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Amundson, R.: 1988, ‘Logical Adaptationism’,Behavioral and Brain Sciences 11, 505–506.

    Google Scholar 

  • Amundson, R.: 1990, ‘Doctor Dennett and Doctor Pangloss: Perfection and Selection in Psychology and Biology’,Behavioral and Brain Sciences 13, 577–584.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arnold, S.J.: 1983, ‘Morphology, Performance, and Fitness’,American Zoologist 23, 347–361.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arnold, S.J.: 1986, ‘Laboratory and Field Approaches to the Study of Adaptation’, in M.E. Feder and G.V. Lauder (eds.),Predator-Prey Relationships: Perspectives and Approaches from the Study of Lower Vertebrates, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arnold, S.J., and M.J. Wade,: 1984, ‘On the Measurement of Natural and Sexual Selection: Theory’,Evolution 38: 709–719.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ayala, Francisco J.: 1970, ‘Teleological Explanations in Evolutionary Biology,’Philosophy of Science 37: 1–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barnes, R.D.: 1991,Invertebrate Zoology, Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, Fort Worth TX.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bigelow, J., and R. Pargetter: 1987, ‘Functions’,The Journal of Philosophy 84: 181–196.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bock, W.J.: 1958, ‘Preadaptation and multiple evolutionary pathways’,Evolution 13: 194–211.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bock, W.J.: 1980, ‘The Definition and Recognition of Biological Adaptation’,American Zoologist 20: 217–227.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bock, W.J., and G. von Wahlert: 1965, ‘Adaptation and the form-function complex’,Evolution 19: 269–299.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bookstein, F., B. Chernoff, R. Elder, J. Humphries, G. Smith, and R. Strauss: 1985,Morphometrics in Evolutionary Biology, Academy of Natural Sciences, Philadelphia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boorse, C.: 1976, ‘Wright on Functions’,Philosophical Review 85: 70–86.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brandon, R.N.: 1981, ‘Biological teleology: Questions and Explanations’,Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 12: 91–105.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brandon, R.N.: 1990,Adaptation and Environment, Princeton Press, Princeton NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cummins, R.: 1975, ‘Functional Analysis’,Journal of Philosophy 72: 741–765. [Excerpts reprinted in Ned Block (ed.), Readings in Philosophy of Psychology, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.]

    Google Scholar 

  • Cummins, R.: 1983,The Nature of Psychological Explanation, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Darwin, C.: 1859,On the Origin of Species, John Murray, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dennett, D.C.: 1987,The Intentional Stance, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Emerson, S.: 1988. ‘Testing for Historical Patterns of Change: a Case Study with Frog Pectoral Girdles’,Paleobiology 14, 174–186.

    Google Scholar 

  • Endler, J.: 1986,Natural Selection in the Wild, Princeton University Press, Princeton NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Falconer, D. S.: 1989,Introduction to Quantitative Genetics, 3rd Ed, Longman, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gans, C.: 1974,Biomechanics: an Approach to Vertebrate Biology, J.B. Lippincott, Philadelphia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goslow, G.E., K.P. Dial, and F.A. Jenkins: 1989, ‘The Avian Shoulder: an Experimental Approach’,American Zoologist 29: 287–301.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gould, S.J. 1980,The Panda's Thumb, W. W. Norton and Company, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gould, S.J., and E. S. Vrba: 1982, ‘Exaptation — A Missing Term in the Science of Form’,Paleobiology 8: 4–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, B.K. (ed.): 1984,Homology, Academic Press, San Diego.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kingsolver, J.G., and M.A.R. Koehl: 1985, ‘Aerodynamics, Thermoregulation, and the Evolution of Insect Wings: Differential Scaling and Evolutionary Change’,Evolution 39: 488–504.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lande, R., and S.J. Arnold: 1983, ‘The Measurement of Selection on Correlated Characters’,Evolution 37: 1210–1226.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lauder, G.V.: 1981, ‘Form and Function: Structural Analysis in Evolutionary Morphology’,Paleobiology 7: 430–442.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lauder, G.V.: 1982, ‘Historical Biology and the Problem of Design’,Journal of Theoretical Biology 97: 57–67.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lauder, G.V.: 1990 ‘Functional Morphology and Systematics: Studying Functional Patterns in an Historical Context’,Annual Review of Ecological Systems 21: 317–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lauder, G.V.: 1991, ‘Biomechanics and Evolution: Integrating Physical and Historical Biology in the Study of Complex Systems’, in J.M.V. Rayner and R.J. Wootton (eds.),Biomechanics in Evolution, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lauder, G.V., A. Leroi, and M. Rose: 1993, ‘Adaptations and History’,Trends in Ecology and Evolution 8, 294–297.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lauder, G.V., and K.F. Liem: 1989, ‘The role of historical factors in the evolution of complex organismal functions’, in D. B. Wake and G. Roth (eds.),Complex Organismal Functions: Integration and Evolution in Vertebrates, John Wiley and Sons, Chichester.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lauder, G.V., and P.C. Wainwright: 1992, ‘Function and History: The Pharyngeal Jaw Apparatus in Primitive Ray-finned Fishes’, in R. Mayden (ed.),Systematics, Historical Ecology, and North American Freshwater Fishes, Stanford University Press, Stanford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewontin, R.C. 1969. ‘The Bases of Conflict in Biological Explanation’,Journal of the History of Biology 2: 35–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liem, K.F.: 1989, ‘Respiratory Gas Bladders in Teleosts: Functional Conservatism and Morphological Diversity’,American Zoologist 29 333–352.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liem, K.F., and D.B. Wake: 1985, ‘Morphology: current approaches and concepts’, in M. Hildebrand, D.M. Bramble, K.F. Liem, and D.B. Wake (eds.),Functional Vertebrate Morphology, Harvard Univ. Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayr, E.: 1982,The Growth of Biological Thought, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Millikan, R.G.: 1984,Language, Thought, and Other Biological Categories, Cambridge MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Millikan, R.G.: 1989, ‘In Defense of Proper Functions,’Philosophy of Science 56 288–302.

    Google Scholar 

  • Millikan, R.G.; 1993,White Queen Psychology and Other Essays for Alice, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neander, K.: 1991, ‘Functions as Selected Effects: The Conceptual Analyst's Defense’,Philosophy of Science 58 168–184.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neander, K.: manuscript, ‘Teleology in Biology’ (Woollongong University, Australia).

  • Nishikawa, K., C.W. Anderson, S.M. Deban, and J. O'Reilly: 1992 ‘The Evolution of Neural Circuits Controlling Feeding Behavior in Frogs’,Brain, Behavior, and Evolution 40 125–140.

    Google Scholar 

  • Patterson, C.: 1982, ‘Morphological Characters and Homology’, in K.A. Joysey and A.E. Friday (eds.),Problems of Phylogenetic Reconstruction, Academic Press, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raup, D.M., and S.M. Stanley: 1971,Principles of Paleontology, W.H. Freeman and Co., San Francisco.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rose, M.R.: 1982, ‘Antagonistic Pleiotropy, Dominance, and Genetic Variation’,Heredity 48 63–78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenberg, A.: 1985,The Structure of Biological Science, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruse, M.: 1971, ‘Function Statements in Biology,’Philosophy of Science 38 87–95.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schaffner, K.: 1993,Discovery and Explanation in Biology and Medicine, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sober, E.: 1984,The Nature of Selection, MIT Press, Cambridge MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sober, E.: 1993,Philosophy of Biology, Westview Press, Boulder CO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wake, D.B., and R. Roth: 1989,Complex Organismal Functions: Integration and Evolution in Vertebrates, John Wiley and Sons, Chichester.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wake, M.H.: 1991, ‘Morphology, the Study of Form and Function, in Modern Evolutionary Biology’,Oxford Surveys in Evolutionary Biology 8 289–346.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, G.C.: 1966,Adaptation and Natural Selection, Princeton University Press, Princeton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wright, L.: 1973, ‘Functions’,Philosophical Review 82 139–168.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Amundson, R., Lauder, G.V. Function without purpose. Biol Philos 9, 443–469 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00850375

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00850375

Key words

Navigation