Skip to main content
Log in

Typology Reconsidered: Two Doctrines on the History of Evolutionary Biology

  • Published:
Biology and Philosophy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Recent historiography of 19th century biology supports the revision of two traditional doctrines about the history of biology. First, the most important and widespread biological debate around the time of Darwin was not evolution versus creation, but biological functionalism versus structuralism. Second, the “idealist” and “typological” structuralist theories of the time were not particularly anti-evolutionary. Typological theories provided argumentation and evidence that was crucial to the refutation of Natural Theological creationism. The contrast between functionalist and structuralist approaches to biology continues today, and the historical misunderstanding of 19th century typological biology may be one of its effects. This historical case can shed light on current controversies regarding the relevance of developmental biology to evolution.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Amundson, R.: 1990, 'Doctor Dennett and Doctor Pangloss: Perfection and Selection in Psychology and Biology', Behavioral and Brain Sciences 13, 577–584.

    Google Scholar 

  • Amundson, R.: 1994, 'Two Concepts of Constraint: Adaptationism and the Challenge from Developmental Biology', Philosophy of Science 61, 556–578.

    Google Scholar 

  • Amundson, R.: 1996, 'Historical Development of the Concept of Adaptation', in M. Rose and G.V. Lauder (eds.), Adaptation, Academic Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Amundson, R.: forthcoming, 'Adaptation and Development: On the Lack of Common Ground', in S. Orzack and E. Sober (eds.), Adaptation and Optimality.

  • Appel, T.: 1987, The Cuvier-Geoffroy Debate: French Biology in the Decades before Darwin, Oxford University Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bell, Sir C.: 1833, The Hand: Its Mechanism and Vital Endowments as Evincing Design, Bridgewater Treatise, Treatise IV, William Pickering, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowler, P.J.: 1977, 'Darwinism and the Argument from Design: Suggestions for a Reevaluation', Journal of the History of Biology 10, 29–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowler, P.J.: 1984, Evolution: The History of an Idea, University of California Press, Berkeley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowler, P.J.: 1988, The Non-Darwinian Revolution, Johns Hopkins Press, Baltimore.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cain, A.J.: 1964, 'The Perfection of Animals', in J.D. McCarthy and C.L. Duddington (eds.), Viewpoints in Biology, Butterworths, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, J.W. and Hughes, T.M.: 1890, The Life and Letters of Adam Sedgwick, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Darwin, C.: 1859, On the Origin of Species. [Reprint, Facsimile of 1st edition, Harvard University Press, Cambridge MA, 1964.]

    Google Scholar 

  • Darwin, C.: 1872, On the Origin of Species, 6th edition. John Murray, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Depew, D. and Weber, B.H.: 1995, Darwinism Evolving, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Desmond, A.: 1989, The Politics of Evolution, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geoffroy St.-Hilaire, É.: 1830, 'On the Philosophy of Nature' (report from Le Globe), Edinburgh New Philosophical Journal 8, 152–155.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ghiselin, M.T.: 1969, The Triumph of the Darwinian Method, University of California Press, Berkeley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilbert, S.F., Opitz, J.M., and Raff, R.A.: 1996, 'Resynthesizing Evolutionary and Development Biology', Developmental Biology 173, 357–372.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gillespie, N.C.: 1987, 'Natural Order, Natural Theology, and Social Order: John Ray and the “Newtonian Ideology”', Journal of the History of Biology 20, 1–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodwin, B.C.: 1982, 'A Relational or Field Theory of Reproduction and its Evolutionary Implications', in M.W. Ho and P.T. Saunders (eds.), Beyond Neo-Darwinism, Academic Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gould, S.J.: 1983, 'Irrelevance, Submission, and Partnership: The Changing Role of Paleontology in Darwin's Three Centennials, and a Modest Proposal for Macroevolution', in D.S. Bendall (ed.), Evolution from Molecules to Men, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greene, J.C.: 1959, The Death of Adam: Evolution and its Impact on Western Thought, University of Iowa Press, Iowa City.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gruber, J.W.: 1960, A Conscience in Conflict: The Life of St. George Jackson Mivart, Columbia University Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, B.K.: 1992, Evolutionary Developmental Biology, Chapman & Hall, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamburger, V.: 1980, 'Embryology and the Modern Synthesis in Evolutionary Theory', in E. Mayr and W. Provine (eds.), The Evolutionary Synthesis, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hopkins, W.: 1860, 'Physical Theories of the Phenomena of Life', Fraser's Magacine, June, 739–753. Reprinted 1973 in D. Hull (ed.), Darwin and His Critics, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hull, D.L.: 1965, 'The Effect of Essentialism on Taxonomy: 2000 Years of Stasis', British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 15, 314–326; 16, 1–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hull, D.L.: 1973, 'Introductory', in Darwin and His Critics, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hull, D.L.: 1983, 'Darwin and the Nature of Science', in D.S. Bendall (ed.), Evolution from Molecules to Men, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lenoir, T.: 1982, The Strategy of Life, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lurie, E.: 1960, Louis Agassiz: A Life in Science, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayr, E.: 1959a, 'Darwin and the Evolutionary Theory in Biology', in Evolution and Anthropology: A Centennial Approach, Anthropological Society of America, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayr, E.: 1959b, 'Agassiz, Darwin, and Evolution', Harvard Library Bulletin 13, 165–194.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayr, E.: 1964, 'Introduction', in Charles Darwin, On the Origin of Species, reprint edition, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayr, E.: 1980, 'Prologue: Some Thoughts on the History of the Evolutionary Synthesis', in E. Mayr and W. Provine (eds.), The Evolutionary Synthesis, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayr, E.: 1982, The Growth of Biological Thought, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayr, E. and Provine, W.: 1980, The Evolutionary Synthesis, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCosh, Rev. J.: 1851, 'Typical Forms: Goethe, Professor Owen, Mr. Fairbain', The North British Review, 389–418.

  • Nyhart, L.: 1995, Biology Takes Form, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ospovat, D.: 1978, 'Perfect Adaptation and Teleological Explanation', Studies in History of Biology 2, 33–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ospovat, D.: 1981, The Development of Darwin's Theory, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Owen, R.: 1848, The Archetype and Homologies of the Vertebrate Skeleton, John van Voorst, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Owen, R.: 1849, On the Nature of Limbs, John van Voorst, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paley, W.: 1831, The Works of William Paley; Complete in one volume, Thomas Nelson and Peter Brown, Edinburgh.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reeve, H.K. and Sherman, P.W.: 1993, 'Adaptation and the Goals of Evolutionary Research', The Quarterly Review of Biology 68, 1–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rehbock, P.F.: 1985, The Philosophical Naturalists, University of Wisconsin Press, Madison, WI.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richards, E.: 1987, 'A Question of Property Rights: Richard Owen's Evolutionism Reassessed', British Journal for the History of Science 20, 129–171.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richards, R.J.: 1992, The Meaning of Evolution, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roget, P.M.: 1834, Animal and Vegetable Physiology Considered with Reference to Natural Theology, 2 vols., William Pickering, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rupke, N.: 1994, Richard Owen: Victorian Naturalist, Yale University Press, New Haven, CT.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruse, M.: 1979, The Darwinian Revolution, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruse, M.: 1993, 'Were Owen and Darwin Naturphilosophen?', Annals of Science 50, 383–388.

    Google Scholar 

  • Russell, E.S.: 1916, Form and Function, John Murray, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sloan, P.R.: 1992, 'On the Edge of Evolution', in R. Owen, it The Hunterian Lectures in Comparative Anatomy, May and June 1837, P.R. Sloan (ed.), University of Chicago Press, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sober, E.: 1980, 'Evolution, Population Thinking, and Essentialism', Philosophy of Science 47, 350–383.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wake, D.B., Mabee, P., Hanken, J., and Wagner, G.: 1991, 'Development and Evolution – The Emergence of a New Field', in E.C. Dudley (ed.), The Unity of Evolutionary Biology: Proceedings of the Fourth International Congress of Systematic and Evolutionary Biology, Volume I, Dioscorides Press, Portland, OR.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wallace, B.: 1986, 'Can Embryologists Contribute to an Understanding of Evolutionary Mechanisms?', in W. Bechtel (ed.), Integrating Scientific Disciplines, Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whewell, W.: 1863, History of the Inductive Sciences: From the Earliest to the Present Times, 3d edition, with additions, in two volumes, v. 2, D. Appleton and Company, New York.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Amundson, R. Typology Reconsidered: Two Doctrines on the History of Evolutionary Biology. Biology & Philosophy 13, 153–177 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1006599002775

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1006599002775

Navigation