Abstract
I respond to Lennart Nordenfelt's analysis of dignity by questioning his attempt to establish an objective standard by which dignity can be determined. I approach this by considering the way in which claims to dignity may be contested and defended. This leads, in the cases of dignity of merit and dignity of moral status, to an apparent relativism. This relativism is checked by further consideration of dignity of identity, and in particular by consideration of the nature of the processes that serve to humiliate people. It is suggested that acts of humiliation attack certain competences that human beings develop as embodied, social beings. Menschenwürde may then be articulated as an account of human nature, in terms of the human potential to develop a series of core competences. This account of human nature aspires to universality, and as such offers an objective ground to dignity. This paper is a product of the research project on Dignity and Older Europeans (Fifth Framework (Quality of Life) Programme, Contract No QLG6, 2001, 00888).
Similar content being viewed by others
REFERENCES
Edgar, A. (1997) Sport, Ethics of. In R. Chadwick (ed.), Encyclopedia of Applied Ethics (Vol. 4), (pp. 207–223). San Diego, CA: Academic.
Habermas, J. (1984) The Theory of Communicative Action: Vol. 1. Reason and the Rationalisation of Society. Cambridge, UK: Polity.
Habermas, J. (1987) The Theory of Communicative Action: Vol. 1I. Lifeworld and System. Cambridge, UK: Polity.
Hume, D. (1996) Selected Essays. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Mead, G. H. (1934) Mind, Self and Society: Form the Standpoint of the Social Behaviourist. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Statman, D. (2000) Humiliation, Dignity and Self-Respect. Philosophical Psychology 13, 523–540.
Taylor, C. (1985) Human Agency and Language: Philosophical Papers I. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Edgar, A. A Response to Nordenfelt's “The Varieties of Dignity”. Health Care Analysis 12, 83–89 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:HCAN.0000041184.82006.8b
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:HCAN.0000041184.82006.8b