Skip to main content
Log in

Modal Languages and Bounded Fragments of Predicate Logic

  • Published:
Journal of Philosophical Logic Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

REFERENCES

  • Alechina, N., On a decidable generalized quantifier logic corresponding to a decidable fragment of predicate logic, Journal of Logic, Language and Information 4(3) (1995), 177–189.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alechina, N. and van Benthem, J., Modal Logics of Structured Domains, Report ML–93–02, Institute for Logic, Language and Computation, University of Amsterdam. To appear in M. de Rijke (ed.), Advances in Intensional Logic, Kluwer, Dordrecht, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alechina, N. and van Lambalgen, M., Correspondence and completeness for generalized quantifiers, Bulletin of the Interest Group in Pure and Applied Logic 3(1995), 167–190.

    Google Scholar 

  • Andréka, H., Complexity of Equations Valid in Algebras of Relations, D. Sc. Dissertation, Hungarian Academy of Sciences, Budapest, 1991. To appear in Annals of Pure and Applied Logic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Andréka, H., van Benthem, J. and Németi, I., What Makes Modal Logic Tick?, manuscript, Institute for Logic, Language and Computation, University of Amsterdam, 1992.

  • Andréka, H., van Benthem, J. and Németi, I., Interpolation and Definability Properties of Finite Variable Fragments, Mathematical Institute, Hungarian Academy of Sciences, Budapest, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  • Andréka, H., van Benthem, J. and Németi, I., Modal Logic and the Finite Variable Hierarchy, manuscript, Institute for Logic, Language and Computation, University of Amsterdam, Mathematical Institute, Hungarian Academy of Sciences, Budapest, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  • Andréka, H., van Benthem, J. and Németi, I., Back and forth between modal logic and classical logic, Bulletin of the Interest Group in Pure and Applied Logics 3(1995A), 685–720, London and Saarbruecken.

    Google Scholar 

  • Andréka, H., van Benthem, J. and Németi, I., Submodel preservation theorems in finite variable fragments, in A. Ponse, M. de Rijke and Y. Venema (eds), Modal Logic and Process Algebra, CSLI Lecture Notes 53, CSLI Publications, Stanford, 1995B, pp. 1–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Andréka, H., van Benthem, J. and Németi, I., Strong decidability and other positive results for algebras of sets of sequences, in preparation, 1996.

  • Andréka, H., Düntsch, I. and Németi, I., Expressibility of properties of relations, Journal of Symbolic Logic 60(3) (1995), 970–991.

    Google Scholar 

  • Andréka, H., Gergely, T. and Németi, I., On universal algebraic construction of logics, Studia Logica 36(1977), 9–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Andréka, H. and Németi, I., Crs With, and Without Substitutions, manuscript, Mathematical Institute, Hungarian Academy of Sciences, Budapest, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barwise, J., Admissible Sets and Structures, Springer Verlag, Berlin, 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barwise, J. and Moss, L., Vicious Circles: On the Mathematics of Non-Wellfounded Phenomena, CSLI Publications, Stanford, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Benthem, J., Modal Correspondence Theory, dissertation, Mathematical Institute, University of Amsterdam, 1976.

  • van Benthem, J., Correspondence theory, in D. Gabbay and F. Guenthner (eds), Handbook of Philosophical Logic, vol. II, Reidel, Dordrecht, 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Benthem, J., Modal Logic and Classical Logic, Bibliopolis, Napoli, 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Benthem, J., Language in Action, North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Benthem, J., Programming Operations that are Safe for Bisimulation, CSLI Report 93–179, Center for the Study of Language and Information, Stanford, 1993. To appear in Studia Logica, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Benthem, J., A Modal Perspective on Process Operations, manuscript, Institute for Logic, Language and Computation, University of Amsterdam, 1994A.

  • van Benthem, J., Modal Foundations for Predicate Logic, CSLI Research Report 94–191, Center for the Study of Language and Information, Stanford University. To appear in E. Orlowska (ed.), Logic at Work, Memorial Volume for Helena Rasiowa, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, 1994B.

  • van Benthem, J., Temporal logic, in D. Gabbay, Ch. Hogger and J. Robinson (eds), Handbook of Logic in AI and Logic Programming, Vol. 4, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1995, pp. 241–350.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Benthem, J., Exploring Logical Dynamics, in Studies in Logic, Language and Information, CSLI Publications, Stanford, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Benthem, J., Dynamic Bits and Pieces, Report LP–97–01, ILLC, University of Amsterdam.

  • van Benthem, J. and Bergstra, J., Logic of transition systems, Journal of Logic, Language and Information 3(4) (1995), 247–283.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chang, C. and Keisler, H., Model Theory, North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dawar, A., Feasible Computation Through Model Theory, dissertation, Computer Science Department, University College of Swansea, 1993.

  • Fine, K., Natural deduction and arbitrary objects, Journal of Philosophical Logic 14 (1985), 57–107.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fitting, M., Basic modal logic, in D. Gabbay, Ch. Hogger and J. Robinson (eds), Handbook of Logic in Artificial Intelligence and Logic Programming, Vol. I, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gabbay, D., Expressive functional completeness in tense logic, in U. Mönnich (ed.), Aspects of Philosophical Logic, Reidel, Dordrecht, 1981, pp. 91–117.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gallin, D., Intensional and Higher-Order Modal Logic, North-Holland, Mathematics Studies 19, Amsterdam, 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gargov, G., Passy, S. and Tinchev, T., Modal environment for Boolean speculations, in D. Skordev (ed.), Mathematical Logic and Applications, Plenum Press, New York, 1987, pp. 253–263.

    Google Scholar 

  • Henkin, L., Logical Systems Containing Only a Finite Number of Symbols, Séminaire de Mathématiques Supérieures 21, Les Presses de l'Université de Montréal, Montréal, 1967, 48 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Henkin, L., Monk, J. D. and Tarski, A., Cylindric Algebras, Part I, North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1971.

    Google Scholar 

  • Henkin, L., Monk, J. D. and Tarski, A., Cylindric Algebras, Part II, North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hennessy, M. and Milner, R., Algebraic laws for nondeterminism and concurrency, Journal of the ACM 32(1985), 137–161.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hodkinson, I., Finite H-dimension does not imply expressive completeness, Journal of Philosophical Logic 23(1994), 535–573.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hollenberg, M. and Vermeulen, K., Counting Variables in a Dynamic Setting, Logic Group Preprint Series 125, Filosofisch Instituut, Rijksuniversiteit, Utrecht, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  • Immerman, N., Relational queries computable in polynomial time, Proceedings 14th Annual ACM Symposium on the Theory of Computing, 1982, pp. 147–152.

  • Immermann, N. and Kozen, D., Definability with bounded number of bound variables, Proceedings 2d IEEE Symposium on Logic in Computer Science, 1987, pp. 236–244.

  • Kolaitis, F. and Väänänen, J., Generalized quantifiers and pebble games on finite structures, Proceedings of the 7th IEEE Symposium on Logic in Computer Science, 1992, pp. 348–359. (Full version to appear in Annals of Pure and Applied Logic.)

  • Kracht, M., How completeness and correspondence theory got married, in M. de Rijke (ed.), Diamonds and Defaults, Kluwer, Dordrecht, 1993, pp. 175–214.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kracht, M. and Wolter, F., Properties of independently axiomatizable bimodal logics, Journal of Symbolic Logic 56(1991), 1469–1485.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Lambalgen, M., Natural deduction for generalized quantifiers, in J. van der Does and J. van Eyck (eds), Generalized Quantifiers, Theory and Applications, Dutch PhD Network for Language, Logic and Information, Amsterdam, 1991, pp. 143–154. (Appeared with CSLI Publications, Stanford, 1996.)

    Google Scholar 

  • van Lambalgen, M. and Simon, A., Axiomatization of Cylindric-Relativized Set Algebras with Polyadic Quantifiers, Institute for Logic, Language and Computation, Amsterdam, and Mathematical Institute, Hungarian Academy of Sciences, Budapest, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  • Madaràsz, J., Craig Interpolation in Algebraizable Logics, submitted. Mathematical Institute, Budapest, 1994, preprint.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marx, M., Arrow Logic and Relativized Algebras of Relations, PhD dissertation, CCSOM and ILLC, University of Amsterdam, 1995.

  • Mason, I., The meta-theory of the classical propositional calculus is not axiomatizable, Journal of Symbolic Logic 50(1985), 451–457.

    Google Scholar 

  • Monk, J. D., Nonfinitizability of classes of representable cylindric algebras, Journal of Symbolic Logic 34(1969), 331–343.

    Google Scholar 

  • Németi, I., Connections between cylindric algebras and initial algebra semantics of CF languages, in B. Domolki and T. Gergely (eds), Mathematical Logic in Computer Science (Proceedings Conference Salgotarjan 1978), Colloq. Math. Soc. J. Bolyai, Vol. 26, North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1981, pp. 561–605.

    Google Scholar 

  • Németi, I., Cylindric-relativized set algebras have strong amalgamation, Journal of Symbolic Logic 50(3) (1985), 689–700.

    Google Scholar 

  • Németi, I., Free Algebras and Decidability in Algebraic Logic, Third Doctoral Dissertation, Mathematical Institute, Hungarian Academy of Sciences, Budapest, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  • Németi, I., On cylindric algebraic model theory, in C. Bergman, R. Maddux and D. Pigozzi (eds), Algebraic Logic and Universal Algebra in Computer Science (Proceedings Conference Ames 1988), Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Vol. 425, Springer Verlag, Berlin, 1990, pp. 37–76.

    Google Scholar 

  • Németi, I., Algebraizations of quantifier logics: an introductory overview, Studia Logica 50(3–4) (1991), 485–569. (See also Németi 1994.)

    Google Scholar 

  • Németi, I., Decidability of weakened versions of first-order logic. First version in Pre-Proceedings Logic at Work, CCSOM, Amsterdam. Appeared as “Decidable Versions of First-Order Logic and Cylindric-Relativized Set Algebras”, in L. Csirmaz, D. Gabbay and M. de Rijke, eds., 1995, Logic Colloquium 92.Veszprem, Hungary, Studies in Logic, Language and Information, CSLI Publications, Stanford, 1992, pp. 177–241.

    Google Scholar 

  • Németi, I., Algebraizations of Quantifier Logics, extended version, to appear in Proceedings Summer School on Algebraic Logic, Budapest, 1994.

  • Ohlbach, H.-J., Semantic-based translation methods for modal logics, Journal of Logic and Computation 1(5) (1991), 691–746.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pigozzi, D., Amalgamation, congruence extension, and interpolation properties in algebras, Algebra Universalis 1(1971), 269–349.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roorda, D., Resource Logics. A Proof-Theoretic Investigation, dissertation, Institute for Logic, Language and Computation, University of Amsterdam, 1991.

  • Rosen, E. and Weinstein, S., Preservation Theorems in Finite Model Theory, The Institute for Research in Cognitive Science, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Rijke, M., Extending Modal Logic, dissertation, Institute for Logic, Language and Computation, University of Amsterdam, 1993.

  • Sain, I., Beth's and Craig's properties via epimorphisms and amalgamation in algebraic logic, in C. Bergman, R. Maddux and D. Pigozzi (eds), Algebraic Logic and Universal Algebra in Computer Science, Lecture Notes in Computer Science 425, Springer Verlag, Berlin, 1990, pp. 209–226.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sain, I. and Simon, A., Negative and Positive Results on Definability Properties in Finite Variable Fragments, manuscript, Mathematical Institute, Hungarian Academy of Sciences, Budapest, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sain, I. and Thompson, R. J., Strictly Finite Schema Axiomatization of Quasi-Polyadic Algebras, Algebraic Logic, North-Holland, 1990, pp. 539–572.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schütte, K., Der Interpolationssatz der Intuitionistischen Prädikatenlogik, Mathematische Annalen 148(1962), 192–200.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tarski, A. and Givant, S. R., A Formalization of Set Theory Without Variables, AMS Colloquium Publications, Vol. 41, Providence, Rhode Island, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  • Venema, Y., Many-Dimensional Modal Logic, dissertation, Mathematical Institute, University of Amsterdam, 1991.

  • Venema, Y., A modal logic for quantification and substitution, in L. Csirmaz, D. Gabbay and M. de Rijke (eds), 1995, Logic Colloquium 92.Veszprem, Hungary, Studies in Logic, Language and Information, CSLI Publications, Stanford, 1995A, pp. 293–309.

    Google Scholar 

  • Venema, Y., Cylindric modal logic, Journal of Symbolic Logic 60(1995B), 591–623.

    Google Scholar 

  • Venema, Y. and Marx, M., Multi-Dimensional Modal Logic, Kluwer, Dordrecht, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  • Visser, A., de Jongh, D., Renardel, G. and van Benthem, J., NNIL, a study in intuitionistic propositional logic, in A. Ponse, M. de Rijke and Y. Venema (eds), Modal Logic and Process Algebra, CSLI Lecture Notes, Stanford, 1995, pp. 289–326.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Andréka, H., Németi, I. & van Benthem, J. Modal Languages and Bounded Fragments of Predicate Logic. Journal of Philosophical Logic 27, 217–274 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1004275029985

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1004275029985

Keywords

Navigation